User talk:Skbhat

Welcome!

Hello, Skbhat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

(A rundhati Bakshi (talk • contribs)) 17:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hindu Imposition[edit]

Firstly, please consider another title for the page; the title "Hindu Imposition" reeks of an NPOV violation.

Secondly, if there really is a viable article to be had, please consider creating it either as a sandbox page in userspace (e.g. User:Skbhat/Sandbox) or through the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process, so that it can be reviewed beforehand to ensure that it's consistent with our inclusion and content rules — and then, if and when it's deemed okay, it will get moved into place. There have been far too many problems with the title so far to let the page be created directly in article space without oversight.

Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 04:28, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indian philosophy[edit]

I have reverted the quote by TS Eliot you recently added to the article. As such the lead section should just introduce and summarize the content in the article. (see Wikipedia:Lead section) The lead section in Indian philosophy starts with a historical introduction. Your quote doesn't fit in there. My suggestion is, if you have many such quotes attributable to reliable sources, consider adding a separate section after Political philosophy. Regards. Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 05:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added influence of Indian philosophy on Schopenhauer and Transcendentalists to the section you created. As for Rajiv Malhotra, it might not be the best idea to refer to his work or to add content related on U-turn theory in the article on Indian philosophy. Since his books are usually on cross-culture studies, you can refer to his books on Cross-cultural studies, Cultural bias, Cultural relativism and other similar articles. TheMandarin is the primary contributor to Rajiv Malhotra article. He might be able to help you more than me in this regard. Cheers! Correct Knowledge^«৳alk» 01:24, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: History Centrism (October 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History Centrism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Skbhat, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:History Centrism[edit]

Hello, Skbhat. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "History Centrism".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:History Centrism}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:43, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]