User talk:Slasher708

July 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Newtons (cookie) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Newtons (cookie) was changed by Slasher708 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951524 on 2014-07-28T02:15:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Clown. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Clown was changed by Slasher708 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966086 on 2014-07-28T02:34:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 02:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Slasher708 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a bad and unjustified edit on the "Clown" page. But it was well over 2 years ago, and I feel the punishment was much worse the the crime. Please release my unnecassary block Slasher708 (talk) 13:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Hardly unnecessary; you did nothing but vandalize. You might suggest to us what you want to do other than vandalize. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.