|This is the talkpage of XLinkBot (formerly SquelchBot), a bot designed to revert spamming, or other edits that introduce external links which do not comply with our external links guideline, or with the policy 'What wikipedia is not' (not a repository of links section).
If your additions were reverted by XLinkBot, please take time to review our external links & spam guidelines, and take note that Wikipedia is not a repository of links, a directory, nor a place to promote your own work. If you feel your addition was within those policies and guidelines and are Reliable and Verifiable, and do not violate Copyright, you may undo the changes made by XLinkBot. Questions are welcome, however this talk page is for civil discussion and is not a complaints department.
Hi. I think this might have been an error edit as the bot *added* a link. Also, the edit seems to have messed up the infobox. Could the bot owner please have a look at this? Thanks! - tucoxn\talk 10:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Funny. this edit 'unbreaks' an infobox formatting, which results in the addition of an email address, which XLinkBot reverted. The url it added seems to be correct and appropriate. Page was still broken on both ends though. That is why I hope RC patrollers do check behind XLinkBot - sometimes there are additional problems with the edits. Thanks for noting this! --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
How to upload image
- Your account needs a certain 'age' / number of edits - It will work after some time. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:52, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
O.K. I understand the deletion of the external link to the association "Les Amis de Claude Delvincourt", but I restored the list of works of Delvincourt, which is of course very useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 19:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I think indeed that the external link does not belong, the rest is fine. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:54, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
BLP Gerard Newcombe
Hi XLinkBot, We've added fair few number of references to the article. Could you please let me know if we meet the requirements now? Thanking you in advance. deepdat— Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepdag (talk • contribs)
- They still do not link to the statements in the article that they should support. I have changed this list to an external links-list, I do think that there is quite some information available to expand the article. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:57, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- They are highly discouraged, also the official ones. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
Lake Eustis Museum of Art
I am the director of Lake Eustis Museum of Art, a 501(3)c nonprofit art museum.
After the first edit/removal of my edits, I removed the Facebook link, as it is a commercial entity -- although a necessary part of every nonprofit these days. I don't understand which of my other edits are objectionable. The link to our .org webpage is not advertising, and in fact was present before my edits.
- The bot will revert everything when it detects links that it finds objectable. As the bot suggests, please revert it (with removal of the links it objected against if you agree that these indeed fail our guidelines), reinstating the good parts of the edit. I'll have a look. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- There are. There are also plenty of good reasons to remove them, as almost all which are relevant to an encyclopedia are copyright violations. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:42, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- The good reasons for that were already laid out in the section, there was a template warning for extreme linkfarming, and a 'no more links'-transclusion. The article is quite big, has 50+ references, and links to various information sources outside. Most of the links in that external link section, including the one that triggered the revert of the bot, were plainly superfluous. Also some of the other links fail our inclusion standards. I have therefore cleaned out the linkfarm. Please see the external links guideline and 'What Wikipedia is not' for more info. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:20, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
HTTP to HTTPS
- Not that there is a preference, but the bot should not have tripped over this change, indeed. I'll keep this in mind as a 'bug', making the bot strip protocols. --Dirk Beetstra T C 04:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)