User talk:Stewartlee39

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Diggit/Diggin' It, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 10:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Diggit/Diggin' It. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 10:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DSCN1890.PNG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:DSCN1890.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gaybook.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! _nonsense ferret 18:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gaybook (2).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! みんな空の下 (トーク) 23:28, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Stewartlee39, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gaybook concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gaybook, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gaybook (2) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gaybook (2), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gaybook[edit]

Hello Stewartlee39. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Gaybook".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gaybook}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gaybook (2)[edit]

Hello Stewartlee39. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Gaybook (2)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gaybook (2)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI[edit]

I have to ask, what do you hope to gain through your efforts at self-promotion at North Road (Manchester)? Any fool can clearly see the similarity between your username and that of the person who purchased the plaque at North Road, and furthermore, what official standing does that plaque have? If it's just something you bought and erected yourself, I have to ask, who the hell cares? The only way your cheap plaque is worth mentioning is if it were official and if it had any media coverage whatsoever. In the absence of that, I will continue to revert your additions to the page until you provide evidence of your plaque's notability. – Pee Jay 23:57, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--

This edit is genuine, I actually bought a £79 plaque this year to replace the one that was stolen in 2000, I actually visited the former ground yesterday to see the plaque I had bought. If you'd like to contact Naomi Layton (Naomi.Layton@uk.fujitsu.com) for proof, please feel free to do so as she met me yesterday, to show me the plaque. It is important for the history of Manchester United to be commemorated. And as a fellow United fan, taking my edits off your page is ridiculous.

Please read my blog too for proof, http://www.leecraigstewart.com/blog/my-trip-to-manchester-two/

Lastly, why have you made it next to impossible for Wiki users to contact you?

Thanks! StewartLee39

If you wish to contact me, I have my own talk page at User talk:PeeJay2K3. But yes, I have no doubt that the information you've added is true, there's just no way to verify it using reliable, independent sources. Have any news organisations reported on your plaque? If not, you're just some guy who spent money on a plaque as a means of self-promotion on Wikipedia, which is not allowed. – Pee Jay 11:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no problem, rules are rules I guess.