User talk:SyrOrange88
Welcome[edit]
|
Thanks for the welcome @Thewolfchild:!!
SyrOrange88, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi SyrOrange88! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 30 October 2020 (UTC) |
An article you recently created, EzCater, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 17:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Praxidicae Oh wow thank you for letting me know, I'm relatively new to publishing pages so I appreciate the advice. I'll look around for some more sources, I figured it was a pretty notable company based on what I was finding, but I can include more of the articles I found. SyrOrange88 (talk) 19:59, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to Nairobi![edit]
Now I have a favor to ask. Lately, there has been a lot of IP editing of a careless nature on Nairobi. The edits are not getting caught in time to be easily reverted, making a ton of work for other editors. Would you please put the article on your watchlist and respond timely to the alerts regarding Nairobi? Generally, all that is required is to press undo and say "unsourced" in the edit summary. Thanks for any help you can give.--Quisqualis (talk) 18:49, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Quisqualis: Glad to help. Added Nairobi to my watchlist.
Your submission at Articles for creation: EzCater has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
-Liancetalk/contribs 22:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EzCater until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
CUPIDICAE💕 01:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Changes to History of Pernambuco[edit]
Thank you for your editing of History of Pernambuco. I have to admit my parenthesizing was excessive and clunky. I noticed that while you had removed all of the parens in the section Pernambuco as Brazil becomes a nation, you did not remove the reference to the reasons for them in the intro paragraph. This was good as it somewhat provided me a focus for rewriting the intro paragraph. I am hoping you will be kind enough to take another look at the section and see if you find it more or less coherent. I don't think I changed much of anything except the intro paragraph. Again thanks.P2dwight (talk) 19:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- @P2dwight: I'll try taking a look at it!
- @SyrOrange88:Ha! Thanks. I never was able to see any flaws in my scribbling until it rests a while. I think I'll claim that I have been reading to much writing in Portuguese. I often find a paragraph that covers a whole page and is comprised of one sentence. What I wrote pretty fairly covered what I think needs to be said. However, after perhaps letting it cure (fester?) for a couple more days, I may be able to make it a less---ahh---obtuse. Thanks for taking the time to look at it again. (I am guessing that ping thing will email you that I have responded, so I'm going to try it.)P2dwight (talk) 18:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
