User talk:Truexper

Truexper is time-challenged but occasionally contributes edits to Wikipedia.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Truexper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Globe (Earth, World), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! VQuakr (talk) 07:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Globe (Earth, World)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Globe (Earth, World). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Earth. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Earth - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. VQuakr (talk) 07:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Methodology of the Primitive Christian Movement[edit]

The article Methodology of the Primitive Christian Movement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:ESSAY, no citations given.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 16:36, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Time-challenged[edit]

The article Time-challenged has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A quick search of this term turned up no sources that this term is used in this manner. Does not meet verifiability or notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 20:42, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I hope you like it now. --Truexper (talk) 07:27, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Time-challenged for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Time-challenged is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time-challenged until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Corvus coronoides _talk 12:15, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to give you fair warning, with your recent changes to the article, you should probably participate in the deletion discussion and describe why your changes address the concerns about original research and synthesis of sourced material brought up by me and others at the discussion. Otherwise, the article is likely to be deleted if you do not advance an argument to support keeping the article. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 21:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Time-challenged[edit]

Hello Truexper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Time-challenged for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ochiwar (talk) 11:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Summary of United States involvement in World War I[edit]

Hello Truexper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Summary of United States involvement in World War I for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:06, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barack Obama’s 2013 climate action plan[edit]

Hello, Truexper. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Barack Obama’s 2013 climate action plan, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 10:32, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Truexper, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 16:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]