User talk:Wainfoatcyclingorgau/History of Cycling in Western Australia

Cycling NA‑class Low‑importance

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
NA	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This page has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Western Australia NA‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Wainfoatcyclingorgau/History of Cycling in Western Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
NA	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This page has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This page is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).

This is a starting point for a history of cycling in Western Australia. It is mostly unrecorded and an oral history. Please contribute with care, Toby at Cycling WAWainfoatcyclingorgau (talk) 01:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move Parsecboy (talk) 14:47, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of Cycling in Western Australia → User:Wainfoatcyclingorgau/History of Cycling in Western Australia — The new editor Wainfoatcyclingorgau has requested help to get this article to a decent level, and this will better work in userspace. I was not so smart, and copied the article, where a move would have been better.. --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 07:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support and remove prod when doing so. I was hoping for improvement where it was. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Removal of deletion page[edit]

I feel the article has more signifigance, reads better despite some sloppy referencing. I shall remove deletion pageToby1kenobi1999 (talk) 00:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]