User talk:Whobbs

Welcome!

Hello, Whobbs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PJM 19:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Wikipedia pictures.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wikipedia pictures.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:45, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Peabutter.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Peabutter.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playdate[edit]

Hello Whobbs. I have nominated the article you created, Playdate, for deletion; see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The content has been moved to this page at Wiktionary, which is a sister project of Wikipedia. You can find the nomination here. Picaroon9288 17:45, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Morty Maxwell, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cyrus Andiron 21:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kermit the Hermit[edit]

I have nominated Kermit the Hermit, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kermit the Hermit. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? akaDruid (talk) 12:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of AlphaPets[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, AlphaPets, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlphaPets. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 23:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Schuym1 (talk) 23:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Popeye spinach[edit]

The article Popeye spinach has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and no assertion of notability. Popeye himself is notable but notability is not inherited

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SpinningSpark 15:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mouse Practice[edit]

The article Mouse Practice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable product

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guerillero | My Talk 01:07, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've proposed it be kept. --jjron (talk) 16:14, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eurps[edit]

The article Eurps has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No attempt to establish notability, quick looks suggests no reason to believe topic is in any way notable enough for a Wikipedia article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DreamGuy (talk) 04:46, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Good-Day Bunnies[edit]

The article The Good-Day Bunnies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NB guidelines for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:38, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AlphaPets for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AlphaPets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlphaPets (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuicoleJR (talk) 16:16, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]