User talk:Willjonesuk

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, Willjonesuk, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Shaun Wallace seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Lard Almighty (talk) 06:10, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Destroyer[edit]

There is no reason to remove some but not all disambig links from an article. Either remove them all and put an "for other uses" link to the disambig page or leave them all there. Lard Almighty (talk) 10:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Lard Almighty (talk) 12:07, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I was just fixing things on my phone. Please look at my edits rather than blindly reverting me. They all make sense. WillJonesUK (talk) 12:15, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No they don't. You have removed some but not all links on Wallace's page and all on others. I have now fixed this by putting a link to the disambig page at the top of each article that appears on the disabig page. That is the proper way to do it. Lard Almighty (talk) 12:18, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. You've removed the useful ones, e.g. cyclist. No point in linking back to TDD on all 4 of those pages as that's not the accident people might make as there is a disambiguation page there. 12:23, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

It's not about "accidents". If someone searches for The Dark Destroyer they are taken to the disambig page. It's about alerting people who are reading those articles that there are other people with that nickname and where to find their articles. So you need a link to the disambig page itself as well as the other useful links. That is why I have added that link to all the articles. Lard Almighty (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of people don't have nickname disambiguation links in the head of their page as it's handled on the disambiguation page itself. Please point to the guideline/policy/whatever that explains the logic of those TDD backlinks. I am thoroughly unconvinced they are necessary. WillJonesUK (talk) 12:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael McPartland for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael McPartland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael McPartland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ―NK1406 ^{talk•contribs} 02:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Fuller[edit]

The article David Fuller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as per WP:PERP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:36, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Fuller for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Fuller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Fuller until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"G.I. Jane II" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect G.I. Jane II and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 1#G.I. Jane II until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 07:17, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]