User talk:Wylie39/Archives/2022/May

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Rollback granted

Hi Wylie39. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 07:10, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Washington Rollback

Hello! This is Dannelsluc. I'm sorry, but I don't know what edit I made that seemed unconstructive. Please provide feedback so I know what I did wrong. I believe the only edit I made was in the talk section where I suggested a map was made. StickyKeys (talk) 22:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

I did not realize it was on a talk page. I am sorry for any confusion. Wylie39 (talk) 00:22, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

-- ferret (talk) 00:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

WP:ENGVAR

An edit like this violates WP:ENGVAR. Please check the context before making changes such as that. Johnuniq (talk) 02:51, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for letting me know. I will make sure to check the context next time. Wylie39 (talk) 03:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Wylie39! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:20, Sunday, April 12, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

not a level 1

That edit to Incest which I undid warranted far more than the level one warning you left. The user in question recently received a level one, and had multiple recent vandalism edits for which warnings had not been given. In fact, I jumped straight to an imminent level warning, and after looking at previous edits reported the user for an immediate block as a vandalism-only account. I also requested that an oversighter remove some of the user's edits from being seen by anyone, which has been done. Meters (talk) 02:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Wylie39 (talk) 02:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

There are some edits that are so bad that we can't even have them visible in the article history. That was one of them. Good luck. Meters (talk) 02:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Reward for addressing articles in Category:Articles needing additional categories from November 2018

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for addressing an article in Category:Articles needing additional categories from November 2018!

—Wynn Liaw (talk) 01:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DietPi (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DietPi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DietPi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Wylie39! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 05:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Wylie39/userboxes

IMHO template space is probably for something more serious than a userspace listing. Template:Wylie39/userboxes, in my opinion, should go to userspace and you can transclude your userspace sandbox page instead of getting it into template space. Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 13:24, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes, definitely. I thought it was in the userspace.{{u|wylie39}} {Talk} 13:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Wylie39, would you mind to move it back to userspace and tag the remaining redirect for CSD WP:G7? Thanks, Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 13:32, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Done.{{u|wylie39}} {Talk} 13:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Reverting the edit

Hello Wylie, this is 74.64.247.200, thank you for letting me know that the such edit was not constructive. However this is not my first time editing Wikipedia as anonymous. I myself edited several Wikias within Fandom (website) with an account. If you have any questions (in or out of Wikipedia), message me.

--74.64.247.200 (talk) 23:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

File:DietPi logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DietPi logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 16:10, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote

Dear Wylie39,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 04:59, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Wylie39:, I saw there is a vote from an anonymous user claiming to be you, can you verify if that was you? Thank you! xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 00:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Xinbenlv, yes, that was me. {{u|wylie39}} {Talk} 01:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi Wylie39/Archives/2022/May,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI Wylie39/Archives/2022/May,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

I saw you forgot to warn the IP 66.4.15.194 after you reverted their edit on La Llorona, and I consider that trout worthy! InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 18:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Bob Fosse Edits

Hi there! I would love to connect with you and chat about edits on the Bob Fosse page. I have just posted a new talk section to the page and I am really looking to revamp his profile with more transparency, sourcing, and more robust information! I would love to work with you, or chat about your plans for the article. I am new to editing, but this is a vital profile that I believe really needs attention. Sustainabilitypurpose (talk) 18:09, 29 March 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sustainabilitypurpose (talk • contribs)