Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 November 8

< November 7	November 9 >

November 8[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all as obsolete --humblefool ® 03:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete FlagIOC templates[edit]

These templates were leftover from attempts to create different versions of {{FlagIOC}} for different Olympic Games. A few months ago I modified FlagIOC so that it works dynamically for all Games years. Therefore, these templates are no longer needed. I have already replaced all usage in the main article namespace. Andrwsc 18:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all as obsolete. Neil916 (Talk) 07:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted --humblefool ® 03:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Egalitarian Socialist Party[edit]

Template created for just one article, that more than likely will be deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egalitarian Socialist Party. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 17:13, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete once the article is gone. Also be sure not to miss Template:Egalitarian Socialist Party, its original home. -David Schaich ^Talk/_Cont 17:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per David Schaich. Neil916 (Talk) 07:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Arab-Israeli conflict 2006[edit]

{subst:tfd top}} delete. --humblefool ® 17:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is redundant to the other templates on the subject like {{Arab-Israeli Conflict}}, {{Israel-Lebanon conflict}}, {{Campaignbox Arab-Israeli conflict}}, {{Campaignbox Israel-Lebanon conflict}}, {{Campaignbox Lebanon 2006}}. Another template is the last thing we need, and it is not logical to organise the conflict by year/template in any event for both practical considerations as well as convention. Tewfik^Talk 16:31, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Tewfik. By year is a piss poor way of organizing the conflict. Jcam 16:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good way of linking. Anyway, I created only this because I knew it would have to go through this test. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Tewfik. Redundant, illogical, tendentious and ugly. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 21:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep none of the mentioned templates is focused on the 2006 Arab-Israeli conflict. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Striver (talk • contribs)

see Template talk:Arab-Israeli conflict 2006 to avoid misinterpretation (TheFEARgod --161.53.48.214 07:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It lists important events in 2006 conflict. --Nielswik_(talk) 04:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to provide good linking. Atlantis Hawk 07:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Merge with Arab-Israeli conflict. Wandalstouring 22:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to be useful. --Hossein.ir 16:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete That these events are connected is WP:OR -- Kendrick7^talk 20:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Tewfik. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Tewfik, Kendrick7. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 05:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, overlap w/existing templates. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 06:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - though we should probably discuss the overall template structure/hierarchy. --Leifern 12:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It looks like the template was created to advance some sort of original research. Beit Or 16:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the Arab-Israeli conflict in 2006 is OR... --Striver 19:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's going to be impossible to maintain 58 of these. --Uncle Bungle 01:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Uncle Bungle and JCam -Preposterous 03:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel or Palestine-related deletions. -- Tewfik^Talk 16:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:European wars of the 17th century[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Joelito (talk) 02:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question was this meant to be on a WikiProject? Atlantis Hawk 07:23, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's part of the nomination below, actually. ;-) Kirill Lokshin 13:17, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:European wars of the 18th century[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Joelito (talk) 02:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Extensive discussion by the Military history WikiProject has come to the consensus that these templates aren't useful, for several reasons:

Navigation templates should link topics that have a reasonably significant relationship, while incidental or trivial similarities are better handled by lists or categories. The conflicts linked on these templates generally have no connection to one another aside from all having occurred on the same continent; there is no reason why a reader viewing one article from the template would have any reason to visit another. The material is already present in list of wars and various of its subpages.
Where relationships between conflicts do exist, they are needlessly obscured by the strictly chronological layout and the arbitrary division by centuries here. Convention, in any case, is to use campaignbox templates to provide navigation among a true "series" of related conflicts.
The templates are already large, and are badly incomplete; they are likely to grow to twice their present size, or more, when all the wars are finally added. This form would be uncomfortably large, and would overwhelm articles.

Hence, we ask that the templates be deleted. Kirill Lokshin 14:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, and a general dislike for overly large nav templates. Carom 14:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. They serve no useful purpose. --ScreaminEagle 15:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Dryzen 15:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Medains 16:31, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Carom. Takes up the whole window on my screen. Jcam 16:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Hossen27 03:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per discussion on WT:MILHIST#Unusual new templates. Neil916 (Talk) 07:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per discussion on WT:MILHIST#Unusual new templates. Wandalstouring 22:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Piet | Talk 21:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete as obsolete --humblefool ® 03:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TV years header[edit]

Obsoleted by Template:Yearbox. Template is now unused. Cburnett 03:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. On a slightly related notice, the new template in 1927 in television and in prior years should be fixed as to not point readers to the same article (Before 1925 in television) through redirects.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted as obsolete --humblefool ® 03:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TV years header short[edit]

Obsoleted by Template:Yearbox. Template is now unused. Cburnett 03:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Same as above.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:PLTf[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete per G1. Simply nonsense. EVula // talk // ☯ // 22:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template for made-up football "country" with a silly made up flag based on the DPRK's flag. _└ ^OzLawyer / _talk ^┐ 00:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per G1, nonsense. A ecis ^{Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984.} 16:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.