User talk:Henrik
I agree with you about leaving out the suspect's name, especially since it's dealing with a minor. Is there another place to point out where it would be against WP policy besides the "do no harm" reference? The user doesn't seem to think it's enough, so I'm looking for another guideline to show him/her. Then again, the one you mentioned is reason enough but he/she seems to think otherwise. Thank you. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 22:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't know alot of the major news sources had already given out his name...hmmm. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 22:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I have seen that, but a Wikipedia article will be visible for a long time - probably longer than a news article which will be buried within a few days by new stories. It is important to get it right, especially with minors involved. That is why I am advocating restraint and patience in this case. henrik•talk 22:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, gotcha. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 22:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I have seen that, but a Wikipedia article will be visible for a long time - probably longer than a news article which will be buried within a few days by new stories. It is important to get it right, especially with minors involved. That is why I am advocating restraint and patience in this case. henrik•talk 22:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Uga Man
Thank you for the support of Uga Man's joke on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Uga Man/presidential campaign, 2008. Basketball110 what famous people say ♣ 18:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Nice page for statistics.
Hi,
I am really glad you made the statistics page. I was searching for it for quite long time now and finally I found my way to the page you made. Awesome job !!! Now-a-days I am enriching the articles Vidarbha & Nagpur and was wondering if anyone really visited them. I was surprised to see the figures for them on your stats page. The articles have decent visitor count than I expected. Such a good tool really boosts our morale & inspires us to continue our work. gppande (talk) 07:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! It's nice to find out that there are actually readers out there, isn't it? :-) henrik•talk 08:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yes,like it a lot. Don't remove it as written on tool page. I hope you are kidding :-)) gppande «talk» 16:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, it's really cool. I have a question though... How accurate/reliable/full is the data? Does it include all views (registered/unregistered/admins/etc)? Thank you, Renata (talk) 05:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Request for mediation not accepted
|
A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Waterboarding 2.
|
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
Most visited User page
Henrik, I like the site you created which tells us how many hits each wiki article has had. Hoping you can help me out, which user page on wiki do you think is the most visited? Do you have any ideas? I was just interested thats all, there are a lot of crazy ones out there which would have taken people a lot of time to create. Any crazy or unusual ones you could tell me about? Thank YaRoadrunnerz45 (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Top 10 in February were (from 10 downto 1):
- Hey Henrik, this tool is awesome. Is there any way for us mere plebs to query the data directly? e.g supply a date and maybe a namespace (or a list of pages), and an ordered list of results back? thanks! pfctdayelise (talk) 12:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Your article hit counter is fucking awesome. I hereby award you this barnstar. Rise, sir knight. Tlogmer ( talk / contributions ) 06:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks! henrik•talk 08:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 10 | 3 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Surprising result with the statistics page.
Hello !
For the views of "Louis Pasteur" on the French Wikipedia, the results are strange : 53194 in February, the half on the same day... Hard to believe...
(Edit : for January, it is OK.)
Marvoir (talk) 10:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe it was featured in a WP:DYK entry on the front page that day, or in a news story on another web site? Spikes like that usually come from a prominant incoming link, methinks. -Pete (talk) 10:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for this answer. You are likely right.
- Thank you for this answer. You are likely right.
Marvoir (talk) 12:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for creating the statistics. I've been waiting for this since 2003. I need to know what I do matters. Now I know. More than I ever imagined. Thanks again 71.191.42.242 (talk) 17:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Congratulation. Nice & good tool --Bramfab 21:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Since When?
- REDIRECT Insert textHi! When was the stats page first posted? Thanx! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Isa cota (talk • contribs) 19:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)