User talk:Shktriib1

August 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Charles Scott Robinson. Sundayclose (talk) 23:59, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm FormalDude. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Megan Huntsman have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ––FormalDude talk 19:26, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already used the talk page but nobody seems to notice it and anyway my edits are right and Dev1357 is wrong because Ryan Scott Blinston is not a serial killer he is a spree killer as a serial killer murders three or more persons, usually in service of abnormal psychological gratification, with the murders taking place over more than a month and including a significant period of time between them yet Blinstons murders took place only less than a month of each other which is the definition of a spree killer, As a matter of fact User:Lightiggy and User talk:FMSky both know that I'm right.--Shktriib1 (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meatpuppetry

You asked User:Richard-of-Earth at User talk:Richard-of-Earth to revert an edit for you that you had previously reverted, in an obvious attempt to skirt the policy on edit warring. That attempt violated the policy at Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Meatpuppetry. We take violations of meatpuppetry very seriously. Consider this your one-and-only warning that the next time you try to engage in meatpuppetry, you will be blocked from editing. I would further advise you to not try to re-insert material that has been removed into North Miami Senior High School, or any other article, without first getting consensus for re-adding such material on the article's talk page. - Donald Albury 23:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of longest prison sentences. Sundayclose (talk) 14:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Patrick J. Adams. Sundayclose (talk) 16:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Cadeken per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- RoySmith (talk) 17:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]