User talk:Telpardec

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Telpardec.

If I posted a message on your talk page, answer there, not here.
If you post a message here, my reply, if any, will be here.
(As much as possible, keep article comments on article talk pages.)
Start New Topic

Archives

1

Talk is cheap. (What are you waiting for? :)
—Telpardec

User talk:Telpardec/Signpost articles

New year 2014

Happy new year to all you triskadekaphobiacs, the 13th year of the 21st century is a wrap. (Siwwy super-stitching wabbits :)

A long time ago, "Hum, I wonder what this [edit] link is for?" And the rest is history. Thanks to everyone for encouraging me to keep going, (or did you say go away:) All my best to y'all in 2014. —Telpardec TALK 03:00, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tree of life 'Darksiders' reference

The tree that is depicted in the first Darksiders game is the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. The tree that is depicted in the second Darksiders game is the Tree of life. I just wanted to clarify that I wasn't making two different versions of the same reference.Love to help Wikipedia (talk) 18:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Garden of Eden may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

In {{bibleref2|Ezekiel|28:12–19|NIV}} ([[NIV]]) the prophet [[Ezekiel]] (the "son of man" sets down God's word against the king of Tyre: the king was the "seal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done —Telpardec 00:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Freddoso, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Notre Dame (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hello,

Just to say thanks for this – I hadn't noticed its effect. I'll now use your placement.

Sardanaphalus (talk) 11:27, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Dohrmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Notre Dame (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sodom and Gomorrah may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

H. Merrill’s Chronological Analysis.]" (PDF) ''Biblical Research Bulletin'' 13, no. 1 (2013): 1–31].</ref>
Rabbah 50:5, on Gen. 9:22 ff. More generally see M.Kasher, Torah Shlemah, vol. 3 to Gen 19:5.)[139]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done —Telpardec

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sodom and Gomorrah may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*More generally see [[Menachem Mendel Kasher|M. Kasher]], ''[[http://books.google.com/books?id=WVDYAAAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=two+angels Torah Shelemah]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done —Telpardec

Archive setup

Established User talk:Telpardec/Archive 1 and transferred older than 2014 sections. —Telpardec TALK 08:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for improving my Article! You are really good with words and the tittle was fixed. Yay! Thanks 4 the Infobox too, I had no idea how to make it. Like I said, thanks! LuckyStar10 (talk) 17:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@LuckyStar10: You're welcome. —Telpardec TALK 23:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

I hope you don't mind, I just would care to voice my annoyance with your signature. In my opinion signatures have little business being pixel art. I know many people are and have been dressing up their signatures significantly over the last few years, you are not alone, but I'm making it my policy to start complaining more about this, since it seems to be getting out of hand lately. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 10:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no pixel art image in my signature, and hey, goose and gander. You added hard to see green to your signature – mine has plain as day deep sky blue. Is that it? you get the blues when you see blue? Maybe my signature needs some warm red wiki love ♥ added, and oh wow, what a great idea – today's the 4th of July, U.S.A. firecracker day – Red, White & Blue day! (Wait for it ... Boom! :)

Cheers. —Telpardec TALK 16:07, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Summer of Monuments

Good morning Telpardec,

I see you are an active Wikipedian in Kentucky. Thus, I am here to tell you about the "Summer of Monuments" photography effort which began on July 1. We are trying to improve our coverage of Nationally Registered Historic Places, of which many in Kentucky remain undepicted! You can find which places are near you (and which are photographed) using this map tool.

Your user page and recent edits indicate that you are interested in The Bible -- which, I realize, does not necessarily imply that you are interested in churches! But if there is an aspect of history, a work of architecture, a populated area, etc., that you would like to see better documented on Wikipedia I would encourage you to share. Or maybe you know some people you would like to tell about Summer of Monuments. There are prizes for the best three photos, for what it's worth.

I hope you have a happy and fulfilling summer. Monumenteer2014 (talk) 12:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In regard to thanked edit on Web colors

Please see the "todo" in this previous edit summary of mine, which is what your edit resolved. I did use Select All, so I was aware of it, but I didn't consider it a high priority because (1) I don't have that much experience with MediaWiki table syntax and (2) the background wasn't technically pure white.

Sorry if this sounds a bit defensive; none of it is meant to diminish the sincerity of the thanks. I just wanted to clarify that I wasn't being sloppy, nor do I intend to be in general. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 19:52, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SoledadKabocha, Thanks for the clarification. There is really no need to explain your thanks. Don't spoil the mystery.
Cheers. —Telpardec TALK 06:21, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Saint Joseph may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

pg=PP23#v=snippet&q=%22Narratives%20and%20commands%22&f=false The Authentic Gospel of Jesus]" (London, Penguin Books, 2004) Chapter 1: Narratives and commands, p. 1-37, ISBN 978-0141912608.</

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:19, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done —Telpardec

since you felt strong enough to revert on an article you've not edited in years

care to offer an opinion on my comments? Talk:Abrahamic_religions#placement_and_undue --Smkolins (talk) 00:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic has the right to be written just the same as Hebrew, Arabs are grandsons of Abraham too and it doesn't matter if they were Muslims because Arab Christians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali69eh (talk • contribs) 15:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

J. Hillis Miller, Sr. - Bibliography

"Other articles in the series call it Bibliography." Yes, I know, I wrote them, but another editor was demanding that the section headers be changed per WP:FNNR. Made no particular sense to me, but I was trying to avoid an edit war. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:33, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Dirtlawyer1 and Omnipaedista: Yes, I saw the edit history. (Is the wiki-road bumpy, or do our wiki-cars have square wheels? :) I was about to suggest a further compromise as "Works cited", since we can't use "Further reading" for a section with general references, but I realized the article was part of a series using the same layout, so there is no compelling reason for that article layout to be different.
Cheers. —Telpardec 23:56, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I never implied that WP:FNNR forces us to choose a specific section title. I just think that when avoiding ambiguity is an option (see WP:FNNR), it should be considered. In any case, I am OK with the "Other articles in the series have..." argument. ----Omnipaedista (talk) 03:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. It sounds like we're all on the same page. Thanks. —Telpardec 14:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween cheer!

Hello Telpardec:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
– JudeccaXIII (talk) 18:56, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. —Telpardec 21:17, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Book of Genesis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

pg58%2B%22The+implications+of+the+new+translation%22&prmd=ivns&strip=1 Google snapshot]]</ref> The idea that God created the world out of nothing (creatio ex nihilo) is central today to

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done —Telpardec

Settings for visual editor

Hi. Thanks for the summary note (Biblical chronology). What setting would I need to change to avoid those <span> things?

I'm not so familiar with the mark-up language. Not sure what span even does. Thanks, ProfGray (talk) 14:24, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ProfGray: This is the first time I have seen something like that and I can't use Visual Editor on my system, so I can't help except to point you to the WP:VisualEditor page, which has a list of editors that may help, and there is a WP:VisualEditor/Feedback page to report problems. Your problem was first identified in August 2014: T71494 VisualEditor: Unnecessary <span>s inserted into articles.
Cheers. —Telpardec TALK 22:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters archive duration

If you have a look, you will see that there are two very large sections that are closely related (almost contiguous). One is an informal RfC and the other, a formal one with the same subject. This is an anomaly rather than the norm. Cinderella157 (talk) 10:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too many cooks in the kitchen. —Telpardec TALK 12:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arphaxad birthdate

Hi! I read your comment here. Can you please provide scholarly references, which show that Arphaxad was born in 1658, 101 years after Shem (Bible say 100)? Thank you Pinea (talk) 22:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arphaxad birthdate

Hi! I read your comment here. Can you please provide scholarly references, which show that Arphaxad was born in 1658, 101 years after Shem (Bible say 100)? Thank you Pinea (talk) 22:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Telpardec. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Bad

Template:Bad has been nominated for merging with Template:No. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. E to the Pi times i (talk | contribs) 22:24, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of "Brotherly love (philosophy)"

Hi Telpardec,

I have proposed deletion of the article Brotherly love (philosophy). Just wanted to give you a ping as the article's creator.

Proposed deletion of Brotherly love (philosophy)

The article Brotherly love (philosophy) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:REDUNDANTFORK. Most of the article is about Christian usage of the term, making it redundant with religious views on love. The extremely brief section on non-Christian applications of the term is just a signpost to the articles agape and phileo.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mosi Nuru (talk) 18:32, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]