Gun laws in Vermont: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 15:5015:50, 25 October 2023‎ 174.233.18.62 talk‎ 13,753 bytes −14‎ It is legal to possess hi cap magazines if you had them before the ban. I corrected that. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 00:4900:49, 14 November 2022‎ Jc3s5h talk contribs‎ 13,767 bytes −3‎ →‎State constitutional provisions: It is redundant to use quotation marks with a block quote. undo

curprev 17:0517:05, 12 September 2022‎ Jc3s5h talk contribs‎ 13,355 bytes +341‎ Keep most of deleted sentence, the absence of which makes the rest of the paragraph nonsensical. Add source for revised sentence and edit to conform to source. undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 15:1915:19, 11 September 2022‎ Plantagenet15 talk contribs‎ 13,014 bytes +24‎ →‎Firearm carry: Fixed typo undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 15:1815:18, 11 September 2022‎ Plantagenet15 talk contribs‎ 12,990 bytes +76‎ →‎Firearm carry: The first part I deleted is not true anymore. Indiana and Georgia are both constitutional carry states that do not distinguish between open or concealed carry and allow both without a permit. The only reference to carry is in the original Rosenthal decision that specifically mentions open and concealed carry. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 02:4802:48, 11 August 2022‎ Diannaa talk contribs‎ 12,914 bytes +1,025‎ re-add content as a block quote, with citation undo
curprev 02:1902:19, 11 August 2022‎ Diannaa talk contribs‎ 11,889 bytes −1,403‎ remove - Vermont laws appear to have copyright protection Tag: Undo

curprev 22:4522:45, 11 December 2021‎ Speedyitalian talk contribs‎ m 11,889 bytes +17‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 22:3022:30, 11 December 2021‎ Speedyitalian talk contribs‎ m 11,872 bytes −1‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 22:2722:27, 11 December 2021‎ Speedyitalian talk contribs‎ 11,873 bytes +41‎ Added sentence quoting the Vermont Statute undo

curprev 01:1301:13, 8 August 2021‎ Csloomis talk contribs‎ m 11,832 bytes −34‎ Reverted edits by Tetsunoskae (talk) to last version by Speedyitalian undo Tags: Rollback SWViewer [1.4]
curprev 01:1301:13, 8 August 2021‎ Tetsunoskae talk contribs‎ 11,866 bytes +34‎ Fixed a typo. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 20:5420:54, 9 May 2021‎ MrThunderbolt1000T talk contribs‎ 10,795 bytes +773‎ Replaced Giffords Law Center citation with multiple Vermont Statutes Online citations because the information in said citation wasn't completely accurate, and because statutes published online by the legislative body are more reliable. Also replaced one citation from a news site because it was made redundant by another news site and because it would be better-replaced by a citation of the statute it talked about. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 20:4220:42, 9 May 2021‎ MrThunderbolt1000T talk contribs‎ 10,022 bytes −12‎ Undid revision 1022316788 by MrThunderbolt1000T (talk) Undid my own revert. Vermont law does, as the previous text said, prohibit selling firearms to persons under 16. I'll be adding a new citation for this and providing new citations for this part of the summary because Giffords Law Center seems to be reading the statutes incorrectly. undo Tag: Undo
curprev 20:3720:37, 9 May 2021‎ MrThunderbolt1000T talk contribs‎ 10,034 bytes +12‎ The source itself says that Vermont doesn't have a minimum age to purchase under the circumstances presented within the parentheses undo Tag: Reverted