Jump to content

Paternity fraud: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

25 July 2024

18 April 2024

10 April 2024

25 March 2024

19 January 2024

13 January 2024

12 January 2024

24 December 2023

16 November 2023

27 October 2023

14 August 2023

1 August 2023

31 July 2023

30 July 2023

7 June 2023

20 April 2023

  • curprev 07:1207:12, 20 April 2023Meeepmep talk contribs 33,266 bytes −122 →‎Finland: This is such strange wording, Finnish judge's don't judge by "pretty much anything", and neither source mentions the UN undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 07:0707:07, 20 April 2023Meeepmep talk contribs 33,388 bytes −697 It seems this section was added to reinforce a very specific viewpoint, same with the criticism section. The very short article cited is written by a law professor, and is much more sympathetic to the victim of paternity fraud than that quote suggests, it's also more of a criticism of paternity law. It barely covers the "consequences of paternity fraud" undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • curprev 06:2306:23, 20 April 2023Meeepmep talk contribs 34,085 bytes −789 One or two cherry picked sentences is not criticism. One of the paper cited literally concludes: "When misattributed paternity is discovered, it is sometimes appropriate for money and property to be reimbursed, but not in every case – particularly where a social father wants to continue in this role." undo Tags: Manual revert Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 April 2023

9 April 2023

27 January 2023

10 January 2023

6 January 2023

3 January 2023

23 December 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)