Protection racket: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 20:3020:30, 20 June 2024‎ Luganchanka talk contribs‎ m 14,830 bytes −48‎ Standardisation of reference undo

curprev 01:2101:21, 1 May 2024‎ Roundelmike talk contribs‎ 14,878 bytes −1‎ Unnecessary comma undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 19:5819:58, 22 December 2023‎ 68.112.18.142 talk‎ 15,028 bytes +134‎ →‎Examples: Add content undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 00:5300:53, 27 September 2023‎ MallonsTalons talk contribs‎ 14,869 bytes +8‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 00:4900:49, 27 September 2023‎ MallonsTalons talk contribs‎ 14,861 bytes +7‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 00:4900:49, 27 September 2023‎ MallonsTalons talk contribs‎ 14,854 bytes +25‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
curprev 00:4700:47, 27 September 2023‎ MallonsTalons talk contribs‎ 14,829 bytes +290‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 02:1502:15, 17 April 2023‎ TheForgottenKing talk contribs‎ 14,539 bytes −137‎ unsourced sentence that doesnt make sense undo Tag: Visual edit

curprev 02:0402:04, 17 August 2022‎ Tgm1024 talk contribs‎ 13,596 bytes −53‎ Undid revision 1103967954 by ElCaraqueno1 (talk) Only one very weak reference says otherwise. Protection rackets never involved private agencies. It is entirely organized crime, and wikipedians once again are content to re-invent terms (or invent them out of whole cloth). undo Tag: Undo
curprev 02:0202:02, 17 August 2022‎ Tgm1024 talk contribs‎ 13,649 bytes −8‎ Undid revision 1103968033 by ElCaraqueno1 (talk) undo Tag: Undo

curprev 20:4520:45, 11 August 2022‎ ElCaraqueno1 talk contribs‎ m 13,657 bytes +8‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
curprev 20:4420:44, 11 August 2022‎ ElCaraqueno1 talk contribs‎ m 13,649 bytes +53‎ Undid revision 1103416781 by Tgm1024 (talk) A protection racket is considered both a form of private security and a form extortion. Without the private security element, it would just be an extortion racket, not a protection racket. An extortion racket and protection racket, although similar, are two different things. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

curprev 16:1516:15, 9 August 2022‎ Tgm1024 talk contribs‎ 13,596 bytes −53‎ No, the "Protection racket" is *never* considered a form of private security, it is considered extortion. undo Tag: Reverted

curprev 14:5514:55, 20 July 2022‎ Tgm1024 talk contribs‎ 13,597 bytes −37‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 04:1204:12, 11 May 2022‎ Madreterra talk contribs‎ 13,634 bytes −1‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 03:5403:54, 11 May 2022‎ Madreterra talk contribs‎ 13,635 bytes 0‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 03:5303:53, 11 May 2022‎ Madreterra talk contribs‎ 13,635 bytes +31‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 06:1206:12, 1 March 2022‎ Madreterra talk contribs‎ 13,604 bytes −16‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit