Jump to content

Stephen King: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

1 June 2024

20 May 2024

3 May 2024

2 May 2024

29 April 2024

27 April 2024

10 April 2024

8 April 2024

2 April 2024

27 March 2024

25 March 2024

23 March 2024

  • curprev 01:3201:32, 23 March 2024Charlie Faust talk contribs 155,134 bytes −54 No edit summary
  • curprev 01:2501:25, 23 March 2024Charlie Faust talk contribs 155,188 bytes −149 'his books have sold more than 350 million copies as of 2006' is 18 years out of date. And isn't the number of copies sold somewhat arbitrary? King would be the first to tell you there are plenty of great writers who are not bestsellers (and plenty of not-so-great ones who are.) Why not say, as Joyce Carol Oates did when introducing him at Princeton, that he's the world's bestselling author and leave it at that? As for 'many have been adapted', that's mentioned later in paragraph.

22 March 2024

21 March 2024

19 March 2024

  • curprev 17:0617:06, 19 March 2024Simonm223 talk contribs 156,340 bytes −692 This appears to be alluding to the annecdote from Dance Macabre although the book fails to provide any basic citations. Again this is taking away the context of what King thought of any influence from an unremembered event that may have happened when he was four. He describes that as specious. Tag: Undo
  • curprev 03:3403:34, 19 March 2024Charlie Faust talk contribs 157,032 bytes +21 I was accused of removing the story on 16:17, 14 March 2024‎. But, if you look at the history, you'll find I didn't do it. Wish I could take credit for it, but it was Simonm223 who removed it, duly noting that "The quote from danse macabre was being misrepresented. King refers to the idea that an event he doesn't remember and that may not have happened when he was four as specious and little better than astrology." Tag: Reverted

16 March 2024

15 March 2024

14 March 2024

11 March 2024

  • curprev 20:4820:48, 11 March 2024AnomieBOT talk contribsm 156,881 bytes +16 Dating maintenance tags: {{Dubious}}
  • curprev 20:2820:28, 11 March 2024Charlie Faust talk contribs 156,865 bytes +48 I never said, not once, that it was dubious to note that the tale was in Danse Macabre. I know that's where it originates. Rather, the tale itself is dubious, partly because King doesn't seem to have mentioned it anywhere before or since, certainly not in his memoir On Writing. Moreover, it flies in the face of established principles of psychology; it is described as a textbook case of dissociative amnesia: 'he has no memory of the event'. Had he witnessed it, he would surely recall it. No dice. Tag: Manual revert
  • curprev 17:0817:08, 11 March 2024Jessintime talk contribs 156,817 bytes −48 Undid revision 1213200344 by Charlie Faust (talk) your opinion on it is WP:OR Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 16:5316:53, 11 March 2024Charlie Faust talk contribs 156,865 bytes +48 I was not saying it was dubious to note that the tale is related in Danse Macabre (it is). Rather, I was saying that the tale is itself dubious, as it flies in the face of established principles of psychology (see Loftus, et al.) Had King witnessed such an event, he would have recalled it at the time, as traumatic events are usually the ones we recall most clearly. Per the article, he did not. He would recall it now. Per the article, 'he has no memory of the event.' Tag: Reverted

9 March 2024

8 March 2024

7 March 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)