Talk:James Rhodes (pianist): Revision history

3 February 2024

• curprev 21:5521:55, 3 February 2024‎ Qwerfjkl (bot) talk contribs‎ 33,319 bytes +27‎ Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26) undo Tag: Talk banner shell conversion

25 April 2022

• curprev 13:0113:01, 25 April 2022‎ Jgvictores talk contribs‎ 33,292 bytes +289‎ →‎Rhodes Law: new section undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

6 September 2018

• curprev 12:5812:58, 6 September 2018‎ Nemo bis talk contribs‎ 33,003 bytes +143‎ →‎Copyright claim by Sony undo
• curprev 12:5412:54, 6 September 2018‎ Nemo bis talk contribs‎ 32,860 bytes +276‎ →‎Copyright claim by Sony: new section undo

21 November 2017

• curprev 06:3306:33, 21 November 2017‎ InternetArchiveBot talk contribs‎ 32,584 bytes +1,099‎ Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.1) undo

18 April 2017

• curprev 11:4411:44, 18 April 2017‎ InternetArchiveBot talk contribs‎ 31,485 bytes +1,134‎ Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.3beta7) undo

16 October 2015

• curprev 00:5400:54, 16 October 2015‎ Kelapstick talk contribs‎ m 30,351 bytes −21‎ no longer being discussed at BLPN, removed: {{BLP noticeboard|date=May 2015}} using AWB undo

10 June 2015

• curprev 11:3611:36, 10 June 2015‎ Spumuq talk contribs‎ 30,372 bytes +15‎ →‎Right to publish autobiography undo
• curprev 11:3511:35, 10 June 2015‎ Spumuq talk contribs‎ 30,357 bytes +214‎ →‎Right to publish autobiography undo

9 June 2015

• curprev 15:5115:51, 9 June 2015‎ Thehistorian10 talk contribs‎ 30,143 bytes +1,525‎ →‎Right to publish autobiography undo

29 May 2015

• curprev 19:0319:03, 29 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 28,618 bytes +116‎ m→‎Blatant BLP issue: add signature undo
• curprev 19:0219:02, 29 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 28,502 bytes +490‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: Added note re: WordSeventeen's bad faith actions contributed to decision to ban him from Wikipedia for a month undo

27 May 2015

• curprev 06:0806:08, 27 May 2015‎ Cullen328 talk contribs‎ 28,012 bytes +369‎ →‎Right to publish autobiography: agree that the Law Gazette source is solid undo
• curprev 03:3803:38, 27 May 2015‎ CorporateM talk contribs‎ 27,643 bytes +304‎ →‎Right to publish autobiography undo
• curprev 03:3403:34, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 27,339 bytes +33‎ added {{BLP noticeboard|date=May 2015}} undo
• curprev 02:5802:58, 27 May 2015‎ Thirdright talk contribs‎ 27,306 bytes +514‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: new section undo
• curprev 02:5702:57, 27 May 2015‎ WordSeventeen talk contribs‎ 26,792 bytes +241‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue undo
• curprev 02:5202:52, 27 May 2015‎ Thirdright talk contribs‎ 26,551 bytes +657‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: re sources undo
• curprev 02:4702:47, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 25,894 bytes +1,071‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: added Wikipedia policy about use of primary sources- they are not categorically forbidden. undo
• curprev 02:4402:44, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 24,823 bytes +86‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: fixed formatting; added that earlier I did suggest WordSeventeen take the issue to the notice board, which did not happen. undo
• curprev 02:4202:42, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 24,737 bytes +782‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: Added info from BLP policy undo
• curprev 02:4002:40, 27 May 2015‎ Lightinlondon talk contribs‎ 23,955 bytes +274‎ clarified that the ex-wife was not censoring or editing the James Rhodes page undo
• curprev 02:3702:37, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 23,681 bytes +49‎ m→‎Blatant BLP issue: added a few words, question mark undo
• curprev 02:3602:36, 27 May 2015‎ SineBot talk contribs‎ m 23,632 bytes +280‎ Signing comment by 131.191.80.213 - "→‎Blatant BLP issue: providing secondary source; abuse of BLP policy should not be used to censor articles inappropriately" undo
• curprev 02:3502:35, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 23,352 bytes +2,231‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: providing secondary source; abuse of BLP policy should not be used to censor articles inappropriately undo
• curprev 02:2702:27, 27 May 2015‎ WordSeventeen talk contribs‎ 21,121 bytes +241‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue undo
• curprev 02:2402:24, 27 May 2015‎ CorporateM talk contribs‎ 20,880 bytes +241‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue undo
• curprev 02:1802:18, 27 May 2015‎ Thirdright talk contribs‎ 20,639 bytes +503‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: re sources undo
• curprev 02:1502:15, 27 May 2015‎ Thirdright talk contribs‎ 20,136 bytes −318‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: attempt to reformat for readability undo
• curprev 02:0002:00, 27 May 2015‎ SineBot talk contribs‎ m 20,454 bytes +280‎ Signing comment by 131.191.80.213 - "→‎Blatant BLP issue: No blatant BLP issue; UK Supreme court website is not a weak source; incl. info from decision is not libelous nor contentious." undo
• curprev 01:5901:59, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 20,174 bytes +199‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: No blatant BLP issue; UK Supreme court website is not a weak source; incl. info from decision is not libelous nor contentious. undo
• curprev 01:5301:53, 27 May 2015‎ WordSeventeen talk contribs‎ 19,975 bytes +1‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue undo
• curprev 01:5201:52, 27 May 2015‎ WordSeventeen talk contribs‎ 19,974 bytes +215‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue undo
• curprev 01:5001:50, 27 May 2015‎ SineBot talk contribs‎ m 19,759 bytes +280‎ Signing comment by 131.191.80.213 - "→‎Blatant BLP issue: →‎Blatant BLP issue: The editing of the article (removal of sentences described in the first paragraph of this section) is wholly unjustified." undo
• curprev 01:4901:49, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 19,479 bytes +324‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: →‎Blatant BLP issue: The editing of the article (removal of sentences described in the first paragraph of this section) is wholly unjustified. undo
• curprev 01:4701:47, 27 May 2015‎ WordSeventeen talk contribs‎ 19,155 bytes +169‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue undo
• curprev 01:4401:44, 27 May 2015‎ WordSeventeen talk contribs‎ 18,986 bytes +191‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue undo
• curprev 01:4201:42, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 18,795 bytes +99‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: Added that information is not poorly sourced. undo
• curprev 01:3901:39, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 18,696 bytes +111‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: added info listing paragraphs 2 & 29 of UK Supreme Court decision undo
• curprev 01:3501:35, 27 May 2015‎ SineBot talk contribs‎ m 18,585 bytes +280‎ Signing comment by 131.191.80.213 - "→‎Blatant BLP issue: UK Supreme Court decision clearly said book could be published; temp injunction (overturned) applied only to DEFENDANTS - not to public or press" undo
• curprev 01:3401:34, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 18,305 bytes +1,042‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: UK Supreme Court decision clearly said book could be published; temp injunction (overturned) applied only to DEFENDANTS - not to public or press undo
• curprev 01:3101:31, 27 May 2015‎ WordSeventeen talk contribs‎ 17,263 bytes +442‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue undo
• curprev 01:2801:28, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 16,821 bytes +101‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: Added: There is nothing libelous or contentious about material published in the UK Supreme Court decision. undo
• curprev 01:2701:27, 27 May 2015‎ WordSeventeen talk contribs‎ 16,720 bytes +320‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue undo
• curprev 01:2701:27, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 16,400 bytes +84‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: Added NO justification for excluding the information published by the UK Supreme Court. undo
• curprev 01:2501:25, 27 May 2015‎ SineBot talk contribs‎ m 16,316 bytes +280‎ Signing comment by 131.191.80.213 - "→‎Blatant BLP issue: Excluding information published by the UK Supreme Court is censorship." undo
• curprev 01:2301:23, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 16,036 bytes +210‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: Excluding information published by the UK Supreme Court is censorship. undo
• curprev 01:2201:22, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 15,826 bytes +590‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: UK Supreme Court decision *is* a HIGH QUALITY source. It is biased to argue that it is not. undo
• curprev 01:1801:18, 27 May 2015‎ WordSeventeen talk contribs‎ 15,236 bytes +399‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue undo
• curprev 01:1701:17, 27 May 2015‎ 131.191.80.213 talk‎ 14,837 bytes +242‎ →‎Blatant BLP issue: Added that there is no BLP issue for information that was made public by the UK Supreme Court decision. undo