User talk:Vinter-light: Difference between revisions
Keysvolume (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
You have been accused of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]]. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vinter-light]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|notes for the suspect]] before editing the evidence page. [[User:Keysvolume|Keysvolume]] ([[User talk:Keysvolume|talk]]) 08:47, 21 October 2009 (UTC) |
You have been accused of [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|sockpuppetry]]. Please refer to [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vinter-light]] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|notes for the suspect]] before editing the evidence page. [[User:Keysvolume|Keysvolume]] ([[User talk:Keysvolume|talk]]) 08:47, 21 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
{{sockpuppeteer|blocked}} |
|||
[[User:Fastily|Fastily]] ([[User talk:Fastily|talk]]) 16:30, 25 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:04, 25 October 2009
|
October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Salwa Judum has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://cpjc.wordpress.com/ (matching the regex rule \bwordpress\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:41, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Salwa Judum has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:09, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Salwa Judum, or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:15, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Please contribute to the discussion at Talk:Salwa Judum#Attempt_at_compromise. Thanks. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 14:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Re:warning to Mehrrunnissa
Hi Vinter-light. I've reverted all of User:Mehrrunnissa's recent vandalism. If Mehrrunnissa vandalizes again, please don't hesitate report them to WP:AIV. Wikipedia has no use for disruptive editors. -FASTILY (TALK) 07:10, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- No problem! Glad I could help. -FASTILY (TALK) 07:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Reliable sources
Blogs in general are not considered reliable sources, and links to most popular blogging hosts like WordPress and LiveJournal are subject to deletion almost automatically. If you have information to add, find a more reliable source, rather than (for example) a partisan organization's website. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- I may have been unclear. The more-or-less automatic blocking was because the link was to a WordPress site (in other words, a blog). More importantly, had the link been to a partisan organization's own domain name, the reference would still probably have been challenged as not coming from a neutral, reliable source. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
sockpuppetry
Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vinter-light for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Keysvolume (talk) 08:47, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely because its owner is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets · sockpuppet investigations casepage) |