Talk:List of people who entered an Alford plea: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Lede: re |
→Lede: add |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* The title is "list of people". The article should be restricted to that. Anything about the plea goes in the [[Alford plea]] article surely? If the [[Alford plea]] article is inadequate, why cannot Cirt improve that? — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] {{toolbar|separator=dot|[[::User talk:RHaworth|talk]] | [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]] }} 16:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC) |
* The title is "list of people". The article should be restricted to that. Anything about the plea goes in the [[Alford plea]] article surely? If the [[Alford plea]] article is inadequate, why cannot Cirt improve that? — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] {{toolbar|separator=dot|[[::User talk:RHaworth|talk]] | [[::Special:Contributions/RHaworth|contribs]] }} 16:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I have improved it. I see no reason why this page should not be able to function as a stand-alone page, grounding the reader with appropriate background info. And there was absolutely no reason for you to abuse your status as admin by abusing usage of the [[WP:ROLLBACK]] tool, as you did, here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_people_who_entered_an_Alford_plea&diff=329049957&oldid=329048293]. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 16:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC) |
:I have improved it. I see no reason why this page should not be able to function as a stand-alone page, grounding the reader with appropriate background info. And there was absolutely no reason for you to abuse your status as admin by abusing usage of the [[WP:ROLLBACK]] tool, as you did, here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_people_who_entered_an_Alford_plea&diff=329049957&oldid=329048293]. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 16:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Please see [[Wikipedia:Featured lists]]. I highly doubt the majority of those have, as you put it, ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_people_who_entered_an_Alford_plea&diff=329051257&oldid=329048391 one line "lede"]''. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 16:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:08, 1 December 2009
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of people who entered an Alford plea article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lede
The lede gives a good overview of the Alford plea and its usage. Please do not remove it. Cirt (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- The title is "list of people". The article should be restricted to that. Anything about the plea goes in the Alford plea article surely? If the Alford plea article is inadequate, why cannot Cirt improve that? — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 16:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- I have improved it. I see no reason why this page should not be able to function as a stand-alone page, grounding the reader with appropriate background info. And there was absolutely no reason for you to abuse your status as admin by abusing usage of the WP:ROLLBACK tool, as you did, here [1]. Cirt (talk) 16:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- Please see Wikipedia:Featured lists. I highly doubt the majority of those have, as you put it, one line "lede". Cirt (talk) 16:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)