Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎User:Nips: not done
Line 99: Line 99:
:ChildofMidnight is a familiar name to many Wikipedia editors, for both good and bad reasons. But putting aside all the drama and controversy, the fact remains that CoM is a very prolific content contributor (hundreds of articles created at a fairly quick rate). CoM should receive the autoreviewer right because (a) he regularly creates new pages, (b) his article creates during his year-plus on Wikipedia comply with policy, and (c) I believe CoM is trustworthy enough. - [[User:A Stop at Willoughby|A Stop at Willoughby]] ([[User talk:A Stop at Willoughby|talk]]) 07:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
:ChildofMidnight is a familiar name to many Wikipedia editors, for both good and bad reasons. But putting aside all the drama and controversy, the fact remains that CoM is a very prolific content contributor (hundreds of articles created at a fairly quick rate). CoM should receive the autoreviewer right because (a) he regularly creates new pages, (b) his article creates during his year-plus on Wikipedia comply with policy, and (c) I believe CoM is trustworthy enough. - [[User:A Stop at Willoughby|A Stop at Willoughby]] ([[User talk:A Stop at Willoughby|talk]]) 07:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
::{{doing}} contacting editor, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AChildofMidnight&action=historysubmit&diff=332272583&oldid=332234514 see here]. [[User:Arbitrarily0|<span style='color:black'><b><u><i><big>A</big>rbitrarily<big>0</big></i></u></b></span>]]&nbsp;<sup><b>([[User talk:Arbitrarily0|<span style="font-variant: small-caps; color:#FF4500;">talk</span>]])</b></sup> 11:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
::{{doing}} contacting editor, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AChildofMidnight&action=historysubmit&diff=332272583&oldid=332234514 see here]. [[User:Arbitrarily0|<span style='color:black'><b><u><i><big>A</big>rbitrarily<big>0</big></i></u></b></span>]]&nbsp;<sup><b>([[User talk:Arbitrarily0|<span style="font-variant: small-caps; color:#FF4500;">talk</span>]])</b></sup> 11:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
:::{{not done}}, per [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AChildofMidnight&action=historysubmit&diff=332432204&oldid=332402506 editor's remarks]. Cheers, [[User:Arbitrarily0|<span style='color:black'><b><u><i><big>A</big>rbitrarily<big>0</big></i></u></b></span>]]&nbsp;<sup><b>([[User talk:Arbitrarily0|<span style="font-variant: small-caps; color:#FF4500;">talk</span>]])</b></sup> 04:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:14, 18 December 2009

Shortcut

Autoreviewer (add request)

User:Malkinann

More than 70 articles created and 13K edits. Usual contributor to Wikipedia:Requested articles/Japan/Anime and Manga - KrebMarkt 16:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 16:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Philipmj24

I have created over 100+ Olympic swimming related articles and I will continue to expand and eventually move on to athletics. Philipmj24 (talk) 10:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - no doubt! Keep it up, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 11:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hellno2

(I have several thousand edits and have created more than 80 articles in a variety of fields to date.) - Hellno2 (talk) 15:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 17:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anna Frodesiak

- Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zink Dawg

- Zink Dawg -- 03:13, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - Tiptoety talk 07:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Redtigerxyz

--Redtigerxyz Talk 18:14, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 19:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


User:AP1787

Long time user, not many recent articles, but hopefully that will change. - AP1787 (talk) 22:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - Only 50 article creations, mostly from several years ago, and while there's no strict limit, I think it's best to only grant the right to active users. –Juliancolton | Talk 22:52, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Buaidh

Autoreviewer request per User:Btilm
 Done -Arbitrarily0 (talk) 04:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:16x9

(optional statement) - 16x9 (talk) 02:30, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Only two articles created and no need. Malinaccier (talk) 02:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fsmatovu

(optional statement)
 Done Malinaccier (talk) 00:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


User:Nips

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. 

- nips (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - the suggested requirement for autoreviewer rights is 75 created articles, while you currently have 8. Please don't hesitate to re-request once you have created some additional articles. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:09, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hybernator

Hybernator is a prolific content contributor, to say the least. He's created 141 articles to date; recently he's created many new articles on obscure monarchs in Asian history. Hybernator should receive the autoreviewer right because (a) he regularly creates new pages, (b) his article creations during his three years on Wikipedia comply with policy, and (c) I believe Hybernator is trustworthy enough. - A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 07:00, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -Arbitrarily0 (talk) 11:37, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChildofMidnight

ChildofMidnight is a familiar name to many Wikipedia editors, for both good and bad reasons. But putting aside all the drama and controversy, the fact remains that CoM is a very prolific content contributor (hundreds of articles created at a fairly quick rate). CoM should receive the autoreviewer right because (a) he regularly creates new pages, (b) his article creates during his year-plus on Wikipedia comply with policy, and (c) I believe CoM is trustworthy enough. - A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 07:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Doing... contacting editor, see here. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 11:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, per editor's remarks. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 04:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Autopatrolled&oldid=332436102"