Jump to content

User talk:Lil-unique1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Dramadeur (talk | contribs)
Line 191: Line 191:


When a sysop closes an AfD after the full week, reverting is not the correct thing to do. If you feel that the sysop incorrectly read the consensus expressed in the debate, take it to [[WP:Deletion review]]. --[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] ([[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|talk]]) 02:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
When a sysop closes an AfD after the full week, reverting is not the correct thing to do. If you feel that the sysop incorrectly read the consensus expressed in the debate, take it to [[WP:Deletion review]]. --[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] ([[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|talk]]) 02:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I nominated it for deletion [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/IDF_Tick_Tock_(2nd_nomination)|here]], since you were the previous one who nominated it I thought you should be warned about the second nomination. [[User:Dramadeur|Dramadeur]] ([[User talk:Dramadeur|talk]]) 20:18, 29 July 2010 (UTC)


== July 2010 ==
== July 2010 ==

Revision as of 20:18, 29 July 2010

It is currently 4:59 PM where this user lives.


User:Lil-unique1
User:Lil-unique1
         
User talk:Lil-unique1
User talk:Lil-unique1
         
User:Lil-unique1/Current & Finished Works
User:Lil-unique1/Current & Finished Works
         
User:Lil-unique1/Awards
User:Lil-unique1/Awards
         
User:Lil-unique1/Sandbox
User:Lil-unique1/Sandbox
         
User:Lil-unique1/Templates
User:Lil-unique1/Templates
       
                                                         
Important Notice
  • Please note that I am currently suffering from exhaustion (Chronic fatigue syndrome) and so even though I don't want to I will be around a less.
  • From >Thursday 29 - Saturday 31 July< I might not be around as I am packing up and leaving my university halls of residence.
  • For swifter resolutions please include links, diffs etc.


Speedy deletion of Charles Content

Just a quick note to let you know that I removed the speedy deletion template you placed on Charles Content because the article did not seem to meet the speedy deletion criterion A7. Please note that the same applies to Thierry Collet. These appear to be professional athletes, who are prima facie notable per WP:ATHLETE. In addition, since they play for their national teams, they are almost certainly notable on that basis too.

Please be aware that is normally inappropriate re-add a speedy deletion template when another editor (other than the creator of the article) has removed it, because speedy deletion is only for uncontroversial deletions. If you believe the article still needs to be deleted, please consider WP:PROD or WP:AFD which can be used for deletions which are not covered by the speedy deletion criteria.

I am not an administrator and I do not have any special authority in this matter. If you feel that I have made a mistake, please feel free to contact me on my talk page. Thparkth (talk)

Each Tear

In the page Each Tear, it says in Germany that the CD Single is being released on June 11, but the source given says June 18.....also, i found another source that says June 18 if you want to add it also......Source 2

Fight for This Love

Hello, Lil-unique1. You have new messages at L-l-CLK-l-l's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Lil-unique1. You have new messages at L-l-CLK-l-l's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please, join the discussion here. Max24(talk) 20:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ciara discography

Thanks for the corrections! Candyo32 21:19, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the talk page! Lol I couldn't figure out how. & I'll make fixes on Ciara discography soon. I searched all over the internet for a decent source for the three unsourced videos as a featured artist, so I guess I'll have to end up removing them. Btw, can you check out and see Return the Favor and Turnin Me On? I'm going to do Knock You Down next, but not right away, I have a few other projects I want to get done before I start on it. Also could you give your opinon here? Candyo32 02:17, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The only minor things I see is I would put the DVD in a table. Also for her solo singles, this may just be my personal peeve, but since it is her solo single, I would add Ghetto to the intro, as well as Everywhere We Go, possibly. I think you probably shouldn't but the highly unsuccessful collaborations in the lead but Separated (Remix) and "Here We Go" could be mentioned in the lead. Candyo32 20:57, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, & I almost forgot "Released outside of US" and "Release in North America" is kind of redundant since it is stated that "-" denotes songs that did not chart or were not released in that territory. Candyo32 21:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
One more thing, again Lol. On Kelly's site now fans can submit there suggestions for the album title now, so I presume Kelly Rowland title has been scrapped. Candyo32 21:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well..

The other person started it, so you should be talking to them, not me. Georgia Peachez (talk) 02:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well you already know that I could careless. I won't lose any sleep over it. I've done anything wrong, i'm just reverting the obvious. Georgia Peachez (talk) 02:13, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Thanks for your contribution. Just to clarify, since I recognize you had a question about it. After I began to nom James Wright for deletion I had a second thought that perhaps the more appropriate first step would be to prod it. That, as you know, is an easier deletion effort to delete, as all it requires is one editor to !vote no. So I went back, and sought to prod it instead of AfD it, requiring myself to go through a likely extra step for deletion. As it was bereft of refs, and I could not find ones reflecting notability, I thought it would ultimatey end up at AfD, and take a bit longer, but thought that the more appropriate course. You then stepped in and completed the AfD process, so rather than cause confusion I just accepted that. Anyway, I hope that clears up the mystery.--Epeefleche (talk) 09:25, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Rowland and Katy Perry

Not to be rude, but my edits for her album were correct. If you report to her website, kellyrowland.com, and watch some of the interviews, she states that the album is currently untitled and that it will be changed (the title). Also, her album will not be released in September. If you Bing/Yahoo!/Google her name, and scroll through the news articles about her, many of them state that the album has been delayed from September to mid-Fall. Though I shouldn't have put November as a release date, mid-Fall is November.--Solotwilight (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Alright, to be quite honest, I haven't been a user of Wikipedia very long, but I do know that Wikipedia is not the kind of encylcopedia where articles are "just left" unless edits are absolutely needed. If the album is untitled and the album has no official release date, then shouldn't her page say that? I mean, to be honest, I see nothing wrong with keeping the album page Kelly Rowland-titled, but it should at least state in the article that the title is subject to change and that there is no official release date as of now.--Solotwilight (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.eurweb.com/?p=36603 http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/rowlands-album-pushed-back_1154257 http://www.teenmusic.com/2010/07/19/rowlands-album-pushed-back http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=1361523 http://www.singersroom.com/news/6056/Kelly-Rowland-Needs-More-Time-New-Album-Pushed-Back There are your "3-4 sources" (5, actually) for the delay. And here is a source for the untitled album (watch/read the interviews): http://www.kellyrowland.com/ --Solotwilight (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And that's "quite alright"? I didn't say I didn't know how Wikipedia operates, I'm just saying that I haven't been using it very long. Kelly Rowland's page needs quite a bit of updating (both her career and third album's pages). And also, if you may know, why doesn't Katy Perry's new album Teenage Dream have a page? It has a hit single that's been released, a second single about to be released, a cover released for both singles, release dates for both singles, release date for the album, cover for the album and tons of info on recording. That, about her page, confuses me.--Solotwilight (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In her recent interviews, she explicitly states that the album will not be titled Kelly Rowland. She also WILL be delaying the album. It needs updating. If you won't allow it, I will do it and add reliable sources that I have found. Not to be rude, but you don't run Wikipedia.--Solotwilight (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've already provided you with the sources above. And also, do you know anything about Katy Perry's second album's article? --Solotwilight (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All the sources state that "the album was due for release on 21 September but the Kelly needs more time for recording and it is now due for release in mid-autumn." And also, answer my ? about Katy Perry!--Solotwilight (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry...I wrote that about my ? above b4 I saw that you had already answered that.--Solotwilight (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, can we at least then say in the album's article's release history "Fall 2010"? And just outta curiousity (this has nothing to do with Wikipedia), have you suggested a title for her new record on her website? ANd what do you think of the new singles?--Solotwilight (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, sorry. Thanks for the help (still trying to read about Wikipedia and fully understand it all). And I agree with you (sorry for my silly questions). Anyways, thanks (and I apologize for all my confusion throwing on you) --Solotwilight (talk) 16:43, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw that. Kind of funny that that came up RIGHT after our discussion.--Solotwilight (talk) 16:43, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is extremely true, I can see why you didn't want to change it now. And I think that was the higher powers LOL. Um, I think that the second and third are way better than "Commander". I like the dance vibe of "Commander" but I don't think it sounds like Kelly. Like, she isn't the kind to write songs that don't have much of a meaning and I don't think "Commander" has much of a meaning. And I LOVE "Rose Colored Glasses", but I don't see it going over. "Grown Woman" will probably be the most successful of the three efforts because it kind of is like her Ms. Kelly roots...but I think it's kind of an amateur single...I don't know...I like "Rose Colored Glasses" the best. Oh, I recently did a LOT of editing on Shontelle and created No Gravity and I was just wondering if you think I should edit anything? --Solotwilight (talk) 18:22, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey, just so you know (im not aware if you are "watch/stalking" my page so just letting you know) ive left talkback on my page. Also, i see you've nominated Kelly Rowland discography for FL status. I just finished a revamp of Kesha discography and although she only has one album released do you think it would be appropriate to list for FL? I dont see anything regarding the guidelines that would say it cannot qualify because of its extension of work. Whats your view? :) (Also, so lame Kelly's album got pushed back, ive been waiting for ever for it) (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 23:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

The articles is very good, i rate it a B but lacks authorship, is the only thing missing.Zidane tribal (talk) 00:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, i`m sorry. I meant that the author of the songs need to be specified, you know who wrote the songs. Zidane tribal (talk) 01:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feel better

--Legolas (talk2me) 09:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3 Words

Hey, just a few questions/comments.

  1. Chart performance should be above the Music video section.
  2. The Music video section
i) Merge Concept and "The music video was directed by Vincent Haycock in the week begining 19 October 2009.[13] It premiered on 27 November 2009.[14] The video was described as being distinctly different to that of previous single "Fight for This Love".[15]" and rename it Background and Concept would probably be better.
ii) There should be a Synopsis section.
  1. Audio sample should be how you had it before, theres nothing in MOS saying it cant be, otherwise we wouldnt have Music video pictures cause they shorten the length of the text as well. :) (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 01:14, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • During the peer review for I Am... Sasha Fierce it was said that text should not be squashed between two objects. However if you don't feel its in issue I don't either. If someone complains later its easily rectifiable so I'm not fussed really.
  • Ok I've done the best I can with the info available for the synopsis. --Lil-unique1


I just read the review, they were actually referring to the image and linked to WP:MOSIMAGE which says nothing regarding the audio sample. And if your saying that there is no references available for the Synopsis section, they dont need references. See GA Avatar Plot. Its the same thing. When describing a plot references arnt needed as most of the time they arnt available. (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me

Ah right no problems then. Well I've shimmied some of the information round and now I think the synopsis serves its purpose no? P.s. you forgot to sign your last post =(
Hahahahah, ive gone back and signed it lol. And it looks good. I will begin a thorough review and it should be up in the next hour. (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 01:46, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lol ok. No problem. I'll problem review any comments you make tomorrow now.
You have a coding error on ref 31, its in red, hard to miss :) (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 01:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved.
Hey CLK, I've sorted the two new active issues. Hope your happy with the results.

Well well well, looks whos forgotten to sign 3 times now, tisk tisk :P And yes the article is looking good. Ill review it furhter as soon as i can, just finishing more corrections to Kesha Discography. (You have responses on my talk page) (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 23:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lil-unique1. You have new messages at Talk:Sweet Dreams (Beyoncé Knowles song)/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I think that all your concerns were done. If not any comment are welcome. TbhotchTalk C. 02:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you love me by Beyonce

http://newsongs.name/new-songs-album270247/Beyonce/Why-Don-t-You-Love-Me-Remixes-/ Can this be used for the tracklisting? US Only, released January 2010. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 08:07, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Am...Sasha Fierce

Apart from the wrong format of the refErences, what does the album lack to pass for GA? Jivesh boodhun (talk) 08:19, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have been told that the only thing the album lacks is a proper formatting of references. I have already started the work and i have fixed all dead links today itself. The copy edit has already been done. Can you help me to format the references? Please help me to make it pass GA. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 09:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help me to fix the track listing for the Platinum Edition? It consists of two parts: I Am... Sasha Fierce and DVD video collection. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 21:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Oh my god, it seems tht you got into my mind and told what i wanted to hear. Of course, i will help you. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 10:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Ok we can start the work. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 17:04, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I suddenly came across this article and it is just great. It will help you to expand the music and especially the conception and production of the album. Please have a look, it's worth a try.

http://www.hiponline.com/8282/beyonce-knowles-biography.html

http://www.blackvibes.com/services/ms/artistInfo.asp?aid=1444

http://www.amazon.com/Beyonce/e/B000APOLQ4


Jivesh boodhun (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re Shakira Tour

What are you talking about? Have you even looked at my changes to article? All I've changed is the link to English language article for one of her concert venues. But twice you have reverted them for no reason. Before you revert my changes again, look at them. Patken4 (talk) 01:21, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IDF Tik Tok

When a sysop closes an AfD after the full week, reverting is not the correct thing to do. If you feel that the sysop incorrectly read the consensus expressed in the debate, take it to WP:Deletion review. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I nominated it for deletion here, since you were the previous one who nominated it I thought you should be warned about the second nomination. Dramadeur (talk) 20:18, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Grown Woman. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update

Kelly's been pushed back a week to November :( But Taylor Swift's was that week too, so it may be a good thing lol. And the front isn't looking to well for the singles. Especially RCG. Grown Woman was looking promising but it's fading away. And Ciara C-Error is just as bad. Although it hasn't been confirmed it seems that she will not be on Usher's Hot Toddy any longer. I'm hoping its not true, an unfinished demo with Ester Dean vocals leaked yesterday and some are saying she is still on the official version but others are stating she's not on it. But she should be giving live performances of "Ride" soon, and although it dropped four spots on the Hot 100, it is up to #4 on the R&B chart, and is her best peak since Promise in '06! Gimme That needs to come like now. Candyo32 17:10, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was just going to work on Versus in my sandbox, but then asual a rampant fan. But Rap-Up did cosign the track listing. And blogs and fansite were reporting Gimme That was going this week, but I've checked all Mediabase reporting sites and none list Gimme THat as going for adds anytime soon. Yeah, Kelly Rowland is like Mya this time around. But yeah if Ciara is featured on the song, it could really booost her. Well it has been officially confirmed Hot Toddy is going to radio August 9th so I guess we'll find out then. If only Basic Instinct could have kept August 25, if indeed she is featured to build up promo. But w/Kelly, she should have just stuck with one US lead single. Beyonce is really the only artist who has successful done dual singles with Single Ladies/If I Were a Boy, Diva/Halo, Sweet Dreams/Ego. But its not working for her, but not even her Ne-Yo has started off rough with Beautiful Monster, but his urban Champagne Life is doing better. Candyo32 17:22, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]