User talk:Hec7: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:32, 7 November 2010

HiJysg23 (talk) 18:40, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome! My name is Sross (Public Policy), and I'm one of the Online Ambassadors assisting students who are contributing to WikiProject United States Public Policy. We're excited to work with you, and we hope you'll stick around. If you haven't already, take a few minutes and check out the handy links below to start sharing your knowledge with the world.

Your class is part of a pilot project for bridging the gap between Wikipedia and the academic world; as you learn how to edit Wikipedia, we'll be learning how to better help newcomers. So it will be a fun learning experience all around! You'll find links below for leaving feedback or getting help. If you need anything further, feel free to contact me at my user talk page. And don't forget: have fun! Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 23:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing cheatsheet
Forgot how that code worked?

Summary of policies and guidelines
A quick reference for Wikipedia's "rules"

Find the page for your course
Forgot the link to your course's page?

Choose a mentor
Contact an ambassador to work with

Help with article assessment
Help us assess these articles!

Starting an article
Guide to starting your first article

Comments or suggestions?

Need help?

Chat with us: Ask a question on the Public Policy IRC channel or on the regular help chat
Are you on Facebook? Like Wikipedia on Campus for the latest news, photos, videos, and helpful tips

Mentors, and online ambassadors

hey. There's an Online Ambassador program etc., and it has a list of mentors. I'm sure some of them will check in to offer their services. Ping me or any one of them for any kind of advice or help. • Ling.Nut 02:33, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confession of 1967

Good job improving the Confession of 1967 article. Why have you reverted your work? Feel free to ask me any questions (on my talk page). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I can see it. Personally I think you are in good shape to go live now, but if your instructor wants you to wait, he may have his reasons. Here's another thing to keep in mind: lead of the article should not contain any new information, only summarize the existing sections. So you'll need to incorporate existing content into yours, leaving it as a lead will not be the best solution. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 00:48, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

top improvements; if you want a review, please feel free to leave me a note here (o:, all best --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 13:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be eligible for appearing on the main page as a "Did you know" entry, if it is nominated it soon; it is supposed to be nominated within 5 days of being created or significantly (5x) expanded.

The instructions for nominating it are at Template talk:Did you know. Basically, all you need to do is take this code:

{{subst:NewDYKnom| article= | hook=... that ? | status=new | author=  }}

and write the hook, a concise and interesting bit of info from the article beginning with "... that" and ending with a question mark. The info from the hook has to be present in the article and supported (in the article) with a citation. Someone will double-check to make sure the source says what it's claimed to say.

Once you've come up with a hook, fill in your username as the author and fill the title of the article, then add the above code, including your hook following the "hook=" part, to the top of the appropriate section for the day the article was started on the DYK template talk page. The code will produce an entry formatted like the others. After that, just keep an eye on the entry; if anyone brings up an issue with it, try to address it. I'll keep an eye out as well. If everything goes well, it will appear on the Main Page for several hours a few days from now. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

very well, your requested kick off review ;o), all best --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 12:56, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see this is your first DYK nomination. I'd like to suggest that next time, you use this template when nominating articles. It gives more detailed descriptions and ensures that you'll get the formatting right. Can you please go back to the hook and insert all relevant wikilinks? Schwede66 17:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hi Hec7, i replied like last time on the workbench, all best --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 15:05, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the lower comment is yours, all best --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bottomposting

Just so you know, on Wikipedia, we use bottomposting. Thanks, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Confession of 1967

Hello! Your submission of Confession of 1967 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Str Pby (talk) 09:11, 26 October 2010 (UTC) Regards, Str Pby (talk) 09:11, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've responded there. Strange Passerby (talk • c • status) 12:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Confession of 1967

On 2 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Confession of 1967, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 18:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:19, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!! The "Confession of 1967" article received more than four thousand views on November 2nd. WOW! Keep up the good work. Annie Lin (Campus Team Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation) (talk) 07:32, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

pierre

hi Hec7, I looked into the changes during your DYK-day (congrats, btw (o: ) and re-corrected some stuff. I do not disagree personally with the two passages about the liberal point of view but I have no realible reference at hand right now and will try to stop by in the institutes library for religios studies tomorrow. regarding your self criticism: philosophy knows, at least since duhem, that there is most likely more than one equally satisfactory way to come up with a theory for every collection of evidence. don't worry ;), all best --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 23:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 110: / Line 110: @@
 :Good job! --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 20:19, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
-:Congratulations!! The "Confession of 1967" article received [http://stats.grok.se/en/201011/Confession_of_1967 more than four thousand views on November 2nd]. WOW! Keep up the good work. [[User:Alin (Public Policy)|Annie Lin (Campus Team Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation)]] ([[User talk:Alin (Public Policy)|talk]]) 07:32, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
+Congratulations!! The "Confession of 1967" article received [http://stats.grok.se/en/201011/Confession_of_1967 more than four thousand views on November 2nd]. WOW! Keep up the good work. [[User:Alin (Public Policy)|Annie Lin (Campus Team Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation)]] ([[User talk:Alin (Public Policy)|talk]]) 07:32, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 == pierre  ==