(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 37:
Line 37:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't mods usually give out warnings first before they start handing out excessive punishments that exceed 24 hours? I think you were being way too harsh, personally. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.174.255.73|81.174.255.73]] ([[User talk:81.174.255.73|talk]]) 16:30, 26 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't mods usually give out warnings first before they start handing out excessive punishments that exceed 24 hours? I think you were being way too harsh, personally. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.174.255.73|81.174.255.73]] ([[User talk:81.174.255.73|talk]]) 16:30, 26 December 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Deletion review for template ==
Hello. As per step #1 of [[WP:DRV]] I would like to ask you to review your deletion of {{tl|uw-mos3}}. This was essentially a stealth nomination, as the person who sent it to TfD failed to put either a {{tl|tfd}} tag on the template itself, or even a note on the talk page. (I could well be wrong, but when I reviewed the deleted template and corresponding talk page, I did not see any edits.) If no one watching the template knew it was up for deletion, there is no way we could have registered our opposition to it. Thank you for your time and consideration, — [[User:Kralizec!|Kralizec!]] ([[User talk:Kralizec!|talk]]) 18:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Revision as of 18:41, 26 December 2010
If you are interested in trying Kissle, edit the dedicated "requests" section below. Please leave bug reports and feature requests on this page. Thanks.
My off-wiki communications policy: I prefer, to the extent possible, that all communications regarding a Wikimedia matter be done on-wiki for the sake of transparency. If there is a compelling reason why it should be done off-wiki, you may email me or talk to me on IRC, but:
For IRC, timely, prompt, or indeed any response is not guaranteed. I stay on IRC even if I am away. If you do not get a response, you may simply send your entire inquiry (i.e., instead of "may I ask a question", ask the question!), in which case I'll treat it like emails when I come back to my computer.
For emails, I will try to respond as soon as I can, but real-life work obviously must take precedence, and it is easy for incoming emails to get lost after a few days. If you don't get a response within a few days, try leaving me a message on my talk page.
In all cases, I will respond on-wiki unless there is a compelling reason not to or you explicitly request that I keep it off-wiki. In the latter case, I reserve the right to not respond at all to the message.
Please do not send private or confidential information; those should be directed to the Arbitration Committee.
Reason: Per WP:MILMOS#NOTE, only recipients of the highest national award (in this case the Medal of Honor) are automatically notable; I'm unable to find any reliable sources on this subject other than the citation.
Hi. My block from editing Wikipedia recently expired. After a single (though non-constructive) edit to a Wikipedia article, with no previous history of vandalism, I was blocked for a period of 31 hours.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't mods usually give out warnings first before they start handing out excessive punishments that exceed 24 hours? I think you were being way too harsh, personally. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.174.255.73 (talk) 16:30, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion review for template
Hello. As per step #1 of WP:DRV I would like to ask you to review your deletion of {{uw-mos3}}. This was essentially a stealth nomination, as the person who sent it to TfD failed to put either a {{tfd}} tag on the template itself, or even a note on the talk page. (I could well be wrong, but when I reviewed the deleted template and corresponding talk page, I did not see any edits.) If no one watching the template knew it was up for deletion, there is no way we could have registered our opposition to it. Thank you for your time and consideration, — Kralizec! (talk) 18:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
