Jump to content

Talk:Fish stocks: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.2) (Balon Greyjoy)
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 13:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 13:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

==Scoring and suggested article improvements==
This article has been chosen for monitoring and improvement by the Stockholm Environment Institute SDG 14 project (see [[Wikipedia:Meetup/SDGs/Communication of environment SDGs|here]]). We are monitoring improvements during the period August 2020 to July 2022 using a scoring tool devised of both automated and expert evaluation. The score for the entire article on Aug 8, 2020 (carried out 11 Feb 2021) was 50/100. For the lead it was 3.4/100. Advice to improve this article:
The title is technically incorrect - fish stock is the base for making fish soup. Fish stocks should be the correct title.
The lead should be lengthened and greatly improved to better reflect the content of the article.
The article could be improved by relating the importance of fish stock assessment to the targets of SDG 14.
The Aug 8 version has numbered notes and bulleted references. This needs to be reversed and all combined into numbered references. [[User:ASRASR|ASRASR]] ([[User talk:ASRASR|talk]]) 17:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:40, 11 February 2021

WikiProject iconFisheries and Fishing Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.


Interesting article

Over here: [1]. Should something be mentioned on this page about the major decline of fish stocks worldwide? I did add a "see also" link to overfishing, but perhaps some information needs to be over here as well (the study found that 1/3 of fish stocks are currently collapsed, and forecasts that all fish stocks will collapse within 50 years). Esn 02:04, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I came to this article looking for the food. Can a mention of this be added at the top of this article? I was going to do this, but I don't know how to have two hatnotes on the same line. Just adding {{For|the food|stock (food)}} adds the note on an extra line, which looks untidy.

i.e. Should look like: "Not to be confused with stockfish. For the food, see stock (food)". --smiler (talk) 10:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Done. --Geronimo20 (talk) 11:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Definition seems limited

I was asked this morning to write a definition of "stock" for a biological opinion on a salmon hatchery. The definition the article leads with does not ring true for Pacific NW salmon, which exist as largely demographically independent populations. For these fish, as I and my colleagues have used the term, stock either refers to one of these populations, or several of them that are managed as a group (usually for harvest). Not complaining, just saying. Am reluctant to edit because don't fully understand the context of the current version. Are we talking groundfish harvest here?Busaccsb (talk) 22:50, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fish stock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fish stock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scoring and suggested article improvements

This article has been chosen for monitoring and improvement by the Stockholm Environment Institute SDG 14 project (see here). We are monitoring improvements during the period August 2020 to July 2022 using a scoring tool devised of both automated and expert evaluation. The score for the entire article on Aug 8, 2020 (carried out 11 Feb 2021) was 50/100. For the lead it was 3.4/100. Advice to improve this article: The title is technically incorrect - fish stock is the base for making fish soup. Fish stocks should be the correct title. The lead should be lengthened and greatly improved to better reflect the content of the article. The article could be improved by relating the importance of fish stock assessment to the targets of SDG 14. The Aug 8 version has numbered notes and bulleted references. This needs to be reversed and all combined into numbered references. ASRASR (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]