User talk:Vice regent

Hi, this is my discussion page. Do not hesitate to leave message for me. Old messages are eventually archived.

Archives (Index)

2012/April 2012/May 2012/June 2012/July 2012/September 2012/November 2013/January 2013/February 2013/June 2013/October 2013/November 2013/December 2014/January 2014/February 2015/January 2015/February 2015/November 2016/September 2016/October 2016/November 2017/March 2017/April 2017/May 2017/June 2017/December 2018/January 2018/February 2018/May 2018/November 2018/December 2019/January 2019/February 2019/March 2019/November 2019/December 2020/March 2020/April 2020/May 2020/June 2020/July 2020/August 2020/September 2020/October 2020/November 2020/December 2021/January 2021/February 2021/March 2021/May 2021/June 2021/July 2021/August 2021/September 2021/October 2021/November 2021/December 2022/January 2022/February 2022/March 2022/May 2022/June 2022/July 2022/August 2022/September 2022/November 2022/December 2023/January 2023/February 2023/March 2023/April 2023/June 2023/July 2023/August 2023/October 2023/November 2023/December 2024/January

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Talk:Murder of Samuel Paty has an RFC

Talk:Murder of Samuel Paty has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Assem Khidhr (talk) 00:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Is this you?

[1] Please clarify. Editing while logged out is okay but you should come clear to avoid this being mistaken as sockpuppetry. Mcphurphy (talk) 05:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Good work on Islam related articles! I've noticed you're super active on here, and we definitely need more contributions from people like you. Jushyosaha604 (talk) 22:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

@Jushyosaha604:, thank you for the coffee, although I prefer tea :-P. But seriously, I've seen some of your edits and they're great too. Hope to keep working together! VR _talk 11:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Superstitions in Muslim societies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superstitions in Muslim societies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superstitions in Muslim societies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bookku (talk) 05:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	This is to recognize your valiant efforts on Wikipedia as a 'brave little son of Islam' to keep things fair and neutral for all religions and faiths as it should be. Wish you the best of health in future. Jazaak Allah Ngrewal1 (talk) 04:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ngrewal1: Wa iyyakum, my brother. Coming from such an active user as yourself, this means a lot!VR _talk 11:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

"Draft:2020 France-Muslim world controversy" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Draft:2020 France-Muslim world controversy. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 6#Draft:2020 France-Muslim world controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Assem Khidhr (talk) 21:23, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Hope you're well

Hi VR, we edited a few of the same articles a couple of months ago, specifically the Superstition and Concubinage in Islam articles. I sort of quit those discussions cold-turkey, which made me feel a little guilty, I felt like you were making some very good points. But editing hot topics on Wikipedia is sometimes more trouble than it's worth, so I've decided not to touch them for a while. Anyway, keep up the good work and Happy Holidays :). AnandaBliss (talk) 18:06, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for leaving this message, I appreciate it!VR _talk 11:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

About titles, honorifics and appeal to popularity

Hello and greetings,

This is just for your kind info. Since previously you have participated in an inconclusive RfC discussion at this RfC in year going by, and since some related aspects are under discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Titles, honorifics and appeal to popularity may be you want to join in to share your inputs or opinions.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 05:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Breastfeeding in Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maternal instinct.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Empire AS ^Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS ^Talk! 13:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! Best wishes to you too for 2021.VR _talk 00:07, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks  :) Empire AS ^Talk! 07:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Problem with rightwing users

Hi Vice regent,

I would like to discuss a certain issue with you in private, can you send me a PM. --BrownianMotionS (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

You can email me using this link. But its better to discuss this on wikipedia. You can post on my talk page whatever you want.VR _talk 02:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Sharing books on MEK

Hello. could you share the books you mentioned in the MEK's talk page,(http://www.sussex-academic.com/sa/titles/politics_ir/CohenRise.htm) or other reliable books you think would help improving the article? Ghazaalch (talk) 10:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

RfC CLOSECHALLENGE request at AN closed

Hey, VR. Hope you've been well. Sorry I forgot to ping you to let you know that I closed your AN request with no action (permanent link), but with some notes still attached. I will say that I think the fact that this request remained at AN for over 2 months (and remained untouched for almost a month) seems quite emblematic of what I said both on that thread as well as at the MEK talk page. Namely, that no outside editor wishes to get into the content weeds for that subject, and no uninvolved admin wants to provide active enforcement, either. That is to say, enforcement which, if we were to follow the example of myself and Vanamonde93's (courtesy ping) approach, is about as activist (as in an agent, not in terms of advocacy, obviously) an admin's role can ever really be on the project.

I note that upon linking to Vanamonde's username just now, I happened to glance at his contribs (just a diff or two, as I am pressed for time at the moment) for a sec and noticed he's back at it, but that, unless I'm misreading, he seems to be at his wits end at this time, just as I had been in the past (diff). I'll stress that this amounts to my only peak into the MEK talk page since my last comment there, and all I read was Vanamonde's aforementioned comment in isolation. Anyway, I guess there goes the "cautious optimism" I expressed at my closing summary at AN. Please feel free to update me about what has been happening there since my last visit — in a breath only, though, if you please! Kind regards, El_C 17:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)