:{{u|Guerillero}} regarding the ''Always Together'' AFI source, you have to look at the bottom right-hand side of the Credits tab. There is a little + sign you need to click, which unfolds more of the list. He's next to last at the bottom of the list as "character in movie". Must have been one of those cameo things, but he's there. Re IBDB, it's an official database of the National Trade Association for the Broadway Theatre Industry. Where human beings are involved, errors can happen, but human beings are ultimately who inputs all data on sourcing. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 09:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
:{{u|Guerillero}} regarding the ''Always Together'' AFI source, you have to look at the bottom right-hand side of the Credits tab. There is a little + sign you need to click, which unfolds more of the list. He's next to last at the bottom of the list as "character in movie". Must have been one of those cameo things, but he's there. Re IBDB, it's an official database of the National Trade Association for the Broadway Theatre Industry. Where human beings are involved, errors can happen, but human beings are ultimately who inputs all data on sourcing. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 09:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
::'''Support''' works for me -- [[User:Guerillero|<span style="color: #0b0080">Guerillero</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]</sup> 01:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
::'''Support''' works for me -- [[User:Guerillero|<span style="color: #0b0080">Guerillero</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]</sup> 01:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
This was a rescue of an un-sourced filmography created in 2005, with very little context or sourcing since then. Given that Humphrey Bogart was an iconic figure during his lifetime, and a film legend ever since, I decided to clean this up and source it. Let's see how it measures up by FLC standards. — Maile (talk) 20:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Drive-by comments
Don't have time for a full review right now, but two things that immediately jump out are as follows:
There is no reason for the abbreviation "misc" to be used in a section heading - write the word in full
Can you clarify? MOS:LEADCITE This lede is a recap of the rest of the article, which is extensively sourced. I've never been asked to source a lede before, but I've been advised to remove citations from ledes. — Maile (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For example, you need a source for his lifespan, the bit about the National Film registry, etc. Basically, just anything which isn't sourced later in the article. ~ HAL33319:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll deal with this after I take care of your other suggestion to make it more interesting. But the National Film registry is already sourced in the body. I'll double check it all after the revamping of the lead.— Maile (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a fan of the chronological image placement. I would make the highest quality on the lede, place theatre images in the Broadway section, and Hollywood images in the film section.
The United States Postal Service honored Bogart in 1997, at ceremony at Grauman's Chinese Theatre unveiling Bogart's stamp as part of the postal service's Legends of Hollywood series. --> "The United States Postal Service honored Bogart in 1997, at a ceremony at Grauman's Chinese Theatre unveiling Bogart's stamp as part of the "Legends of Hollywood" series."
"He formed Santana Productions in 1948, with the company's 1950 production of In a Lonely Place chosen by the National Film Registry in 2007 for permanent preservation as "culturally, historically or aesthetically" significant" - source?
"Occasionally Bogart made a few public fund-raising/patriotic appearances on film" - you don't need both "occasionally" and "a few"
Done
"the National Broadcasting Company, later predecessor of American Broadcasting Company [ABC] in 1943–1945" - firstly "later predecessor" makes no sense. And secondly, I am no expert on US television, but aren't NBC and ABC rival networks? Rather than one being a predecessor of the other?
Question: ChrisTheDude This is why the Blue Network is linked, and its article is well sourced. Perhaps you can suggest a better wording, and the history is pretty detailed. Please see the infobox there. NBC owned two networks, NBC and Blue Network, the later of which was launched January 1, 1927. In January of 1945 it was calling itself "The Blue Network of the American Broadcasting Company" and six months later was just calling itself American Broadcasting Company. The splitting off had something to do with Federal anti-trust violations, but I don't know the legal details. In December of that year, the FCC approved the licensing transfer from NBC to exclusively ABC. So, kind of complicated. I'm open to suggestion on the wording. — Maile (talk) 20:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Air date column in the radio/TV table doesn't sort correctly (it puts all the ones that just show a year first, and then all the ones that show a month afterwards)
Question: ChrisTheDude just scanning through what you wrote above. As noted in the above from HAL much (if not all) of what you are requiring as sourced in the lead, is actually quite well sourced in the body. Isn't the lead just supposed to be a recap of what is already sourced in thee article? Feedback on this please. — Maile (talk) 18:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, you are quite correct. I was typing the comments as I read through the article and should have gone back and deleted those when I found the sources but I forgot to..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
"Note that the opening and closing dates of the below productions are not listed.": It would be better to either remove that or say something about what data isn't available from the sources (apart from what you already say).
1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. I checked sorting on some columns and sampled the redirects in the tables.
2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
4. It is navigable.
5. It meets style requirements. The images are outstanding, but I don't know much about the finer points of copyright.
6. It is stable.
Support, since this is close enough to the finish line. Well done. (I hope you'll drop by my plant list noms every now and then, but they tend to be long, so don't sweat it.) - Dank (push to talk) 00:31, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thoughts
The last time that IBDB came up on WP:RSN it wasn't positive [1]. That being said, I can look past this since it is ran by The Broadway League.
The AFI catalogue passes my bar due to how they list their sources
In a spot check of a listed movie, I don't see Bogart's name [2]
Guerillero regarding the Always Together AFI source, you have to look at the bottom right-hand side of the Credits tab. There is a little + sign you need to click, which unfolds more of the list. He's next to last at the bottom of the list as "character in movie". Must have been one of those cameo things, but he's there. Re IBDB, it's an official database of the National Trade Association for the Broadway Theatre Industry. Where human beings are involved, errors can happen, but human beings are ultimately who inputs all data on sourcing. — Maile (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
Done — Maile (talk) 00:44, 5 April 2021 (UTC)