User talk:Kurykh: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 349: | Line 349: | ||
== Fair use vio? == |
== Fair use vio? == |
||
The Cyberman image doesn't count as parody? (not to mention it's a PR released image) --[[User:John Kenneth Fisher|John Kenneth Fisher]] 00:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC) |
The Cyberman image doesn't count as parody? (not to mention it's a PR released image) --[[User:John Kenneth Fisher|John Kenneth Fisher]] 00:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Your ban == |
|||
'''Reader Note:''' The Admin who banned me admitted he doesn't know the background to the dispute, and therefore cannot make a legitimate finding of fact or any decision in the matter. I consider the sockpuppet template to be an act of libel, and the Admin who posted it now subject to legal action. Former [[user:Nkras]] [[User:216.160.23.45|216.160.23.45]] 02:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:14, 20 February 2007
Welcome!
Hello, physicq210, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Bachrach44 01:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
All over the place
I seem to be running into you all over the place! Thanks for the quick intervention at Stephen Colbert and all the tireless work you do here, and good luck on exams that end the 24th (my birthday!). Cheers! /Blaxthos 21:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks...
... for closing that interminable thread on WP:AN/I. Good luck with exams. MastCell 22:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Suggestions?
Do you have any suggestions as to what can be done about blatant vandals who blank their talk pages to hide their warnings? KatalavenoTC 03:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry ... ?
Just FYI, I was referring to policy WP:BLOCK (not "blockquote", seriously). However, is there any reason you don't suspect sockpuppetry going on? I seem to be seeing Telltale Sign Number One of socks, being that as soon as a user is blocked, not one, but two, users come to the blocked's defense, saying, "yeah, the block was in error and let's admit it". What do you think? Yuser31415 07:14, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 4 | 22 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| Wikipedia modifies handling of "nofollow" tag | WikiWorld comic: "Truthiness" |
| News and notes: Talk page template, milestones | Wikipedia in the News |
| Features and admins | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Why me? Why solely me?
In response to your comment about the ongoing 3RR war with that other member. Yes, I understand the frustration and I do want it to end as much as you...but I do NOT see how you can pin the blame SOLELY on me. He is just as much to blame as I am, but you never female-dog him. Only me. I don't find that fair. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CBFan (talk • contribs) 17:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC).
Thanks for putting my edit onto the main page, as soon as I did it I realised what I had done. It showed up that the last edit to the page was from me on my watchlist, but when I tried to revert it in the page history, my edit didn't show up - god damn servers! thanks again RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 00:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
AIV and ParalelUni
I would not call another user "despicable" lightly, and I had a specific reason for saying what I said to a likely sock of that user. Please see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/St Christopher#ParalelUni_is_uncivil and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/St Christopher/Evidence. There was a wide consensus in that case that this user's conduct may have been the worst in the history of Wikipedia. Newyorkbrad 02:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- So because a user acted badly makes it okay for admin to discuss them in an uncivil way particularly when they can't respond? That hardly seems appropriate. Bad form. 67.177.149.119 02:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Physicq210, please check your e-mail in a few minutes. Thanks. Newyorkbrad 02:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
AWB
Yes, please. I like your template a lot better, too.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 5 | 29 January 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
HELP!!!!
Okay, I don't want to sound like I think you have nothing better to do, but you obviously know something about wikimarkup. I need help with my user page and am at my wits end of how to fix it. I know some HTML, but I can't figure out how to make it work on wikipedia. PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!J.delanoy 23:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. Do you want to "chat" on your discussion page or mine?J.delanoy 23:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar!
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For blocking vandals on AIV, your thousands of great edits, and your continuing dedication to the project, I award you this Original Barnstar in all of its classic glory. Je via sano! Cheers, Dar-Ape 20:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC) |
- You're quite welcome! Dar-Ape 00:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 6 | 5 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
3RR
Dear Phyicq,
thanks for unblocking me .... it was a very genuine mistake - I assumed that if I were following the guidelines for NPOV then with a { { POV } } tag that the other parties would take it seriously and follow the procedure - I also thought that administrators would not only rebuke those who were removing the { { POV } } tag, but congratulate me (or at worst explain where I was going wrong with the procedure). The last thought on my mind was that I would be reprimanded when I was constantly explaining my actions - and I honestly didn't remember the 3RR (but in retrospect, it does ring a bell ... but not a big one!
Worst still, I now have three reputable articles all of which give credence to a number of experts holding a view that is contrary to that in the article. What do I do? Ignore the fact the article is POV?
But, I can't blame you for doing the right thing in this case - and there must be so many other disputes so I'm not asking for special treatment .... but a genuine thanks! Mike 11:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Please chime in if you have any thoughts
There's an interesting experience going on over at WikiProject California, and WikiProject Southern California.
Some time ago, WikiProject California members had placed their project tags on all articles about California cities. Those tags have been in place for some time. Recently certain members of WikiProject Southern California, after discussion on that project's talk page (only), decided to remove the WikiProject California tags for (almost all) Southern California cities, and replace the tags with WikiProject Southern California tags - only.
That is, the WikiProject Southern California members didn't simply add the WikiProject Southern California tag to Southern California cities, the WikiProject California tags were completely removed. This was done apparently without consultation with the WikiProject California members.
We are gathering responses to the following questions on those projects' talk pages:
- Do you have a view whether the WikiProject California tag should be removed from a large number of cities in Southern California?
- Do you have a view whether city article for Southern California cities should have more than one WikiProject tag?
Please let us know if you have a view! Spamreporter1 16:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Happy birthday !
|
Happy Birthday, Kurykh, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
Whatever you wish for on your special day, May each of your wishes come true
Cheers! PeaceNT 01:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
The Wikipedia Birthday Committee wishes you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day. |
- Happy Birthday on behalf of WP:BDC. Have a nice day! --Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 01:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #1
   The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||
| Volume 1, Issue 1 | 10 February 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
RfA
i DIDN'T realize that the RfA page wasn't for evidence! What are we supposed to post there? (it probably says somewhere, eh?) Maybe I shoulda 'RTFI'! (read the fuckin' instructions' ;-) - FAAFA 01:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
San Francisco Bay Area WikiProject
As you're a member of the project, I invite you to use the userbox: {{User SFBA Project}}. I'm hoping you'll be an important contributor to the project, which I'm currently trying to revive/bring to life in the first place. Thanks! — Emiellaiendiay 07:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gizwidget
Logged on to IRC to seek guidance, was deciding within a couple. ~ PseudoSudo 04:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- You seemed uncertain as to why I simply reverted and didn't follow up; I wasn't sure whether to close it or mark for speedy, so I logged on to IRC to get the opinion of others before going ahead with either. ~ PseudoSudo 04:50, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
RfA closing templates
Where are they? I wanted to close Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/HyperSonicBoom early (for the same reason you did), but I couldn't find the templates and I was about to head out (enough time to just do a copy/paste of a subst:, but not enough time to hunt down a denied RfA and adapt it). EVula // talk // ☯ // 03:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 20:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Just seeing how much longer you might be around
Just checking on some familiar names, to see how much longer they might be around to lend a hand on policing the California Gold Rush Main page FA that's up right now. I'll be here for another couple of hours at least. NorCalHistory 06:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Fair use vio?
The Cyberman image doesn't count as parody? (not to mention it's a PR released image) --John Kenneth Fisher 00:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Your ban
Reader Note: The Admin who banned me admitted he doesn't know the background to the dispute, and therefore cannot make a legitimate finding of fact or any decision in the matter. I consider the sockpuppet template to be an act of libel, and the Admin who posted it now subject to legal action. Former user:Nkras 216.160.23.45 02:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)