User talk:Extorc

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:21, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks >>> Extorc.talk(); 07:37, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your efforts in counter-vandalism work. Keep it up! Volten001 ☎ 12:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

RM relisting

Hi. When relisting RM discussions, the "relisting" should be added just after the signature of nominator, like I have done here. Keep up the good work :-) —usernamekiran (talk) 08:56, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes @Usernamekiran, I know that. I might've misplaced it once or twice. >>> Extorc.talk 15:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

no worries —usernamekiran (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks >>> Extorc.talk 16:00, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akash Ambani (2nd nomination)

Hello, Extorc,

Please do not cast aspersions and imply other editors are using sockpuppets or are behaving deceitfully in a deletion discussion. This could be construed as a personal attack and lead to a loss of editing prvileges. If you believe there is sockpuppetry going on, the appropriate thing to do is to file a SPI case where you can present your evidence and checkusers can evaluate it. I understand deletion discussions can get a little heated but please try to remain civil. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

SPI and "checkusers" will never resolve concerns over blatant canvassing which has clearly happened there. My statement was logically correct as it noted the accurate hallmarks of canvassing and it was probably more easier to understand than the usual instances of canvassing that we see elsewhere. >>> Extorc.talk 17:46, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Why did you Redirect the article here after the AFD was closed as No consensus ,I have reverted you.As as a senior editor I hope you understand.You can renominate the article for deletion after some time if you wish.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21

19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)