Wikipedia:Featured article review/Trapped in the Closet (South Park)/archive1

Trapped in the Closet (South Park)

Trapped in the Closet (South Park) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

As of 14 August 2024, 03:45 (UTC), this page is active and open for discussion. A FAR coordinator will advance or close this nomination when consensus is reached.

• Featured article candidates/Trapped in the Closet (South Park)

• Featured article review/Trapped in the Closet (South Park)/archive1

Notified: WikiProject Animation/South Park task force, WikiProject Television, Szmenderowiecki

Review section

Nominating for FAR per notes on the talk page, primarily comprehensiveness and organization; minor issues are with referencing and images. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 00:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

The most obvious issues to me are:

• Lead is too long, especially the second paragraph
• Plot summary exceeds 400 words (MOS:TVPLOT)
• Excessively long quotes
• Legacy section is mostly sourced to primary sources and could be cut (aside from Emmys part)

Basically all stuff that was already noted. I'll try to shorten the lead and plot section but the controversies probably need a more thorough pruning. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

I reviewed the images. I amended the rationale for the infobox, and I believe that the second image (the ad in Variety) is salvageable under WP:NFC#CS, because there is sourced commentary about the image (note the text says it was interpreted as a sneaky allusion to Mel Gibson, instead of being the congratulations that Variety intended that ad to be.

I agree that the third image isn't worthy of inclusion because it's simply illustrative, so I removed it.

I cannot comment on proper organisation or comprehensiveness because I'm not too familiar with the subject of the article. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 12:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

• Move to FARC. While some progress was made shortly after it was nominated, the concerns about the balance and reception sections have not had enough attention. Z1720 (talk) 19:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
• Move to FARC per above. Hog Farm _Talk 13:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include comprehensiveness and structure. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

• Delist no progress to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 21:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
• Delist definitely below FA quality. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
• Delist per above, further work needed. Hog Farm _Talk 04:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
• Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)