Jump to content

Talk:Justin Stebbing: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Line 10: Line 10:
This article is comical. The amount of unnecessary statements, weak sources, and qualifications included in this article make it laughably poor. It is in major need of a rewrite, or possibly even deletion as I fail to see the necessity of having an article dedicated to the CV of an oncologist. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, nor a monument to every single person's life's achievements, it is an encyclopedia. [[User:Mr anonymous username|Mr anonymous username]] ([[User talk:Mr anonymous username|talk]]) 20:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is comical. The amount of unnecessary statements, weak sources, and qualifications included in this article make it laughably poor. It is in major need of a rewrite, or possibly even deletion as I fail to see the necessity of having an article dedicated to the CV of an oncologist. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, nor a monument to every single person's life's achievements, it is an encyclopedia. [[User:Mr anonymous username|Mr anonymous username]] ([[User talk:Mr anonymous username|talk]]) 20:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)


There are certainly a whole bunch of issues going on with this article that need addressing.
# Lots of [[MOS:PEACOCK]] (I've cut some of the worst offenders)
# Edits by what appears to be subject of the article, {{user|Justinstebbing}} (I've informed of the COI policies)
# Edits by an unusually large number of [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account]]s, with oddly similar allcaps usernames, which at a glance raise warning signs of possible COIs:
#* {{user|STEVEJONES1979}}
#* {{user|DRALYSONSMITH}}
#* {{user|NATHAN-O-NAGEL}}
#* {{user|NATHANNAGEL}}
#* {{user|79OLIVER19}}
# Regular edits to remove unflattering material, e.g.:
#* Gradual erosion and removal of GMC suspension section: {{Diff|Justin Stebbing|1118849492|next}} {{Diff|Justin Stebbing|1184098702|next}} {{Diff|Justin Stebbing|1193896035|next}} (I've reverted this, since it appears to be an important and well-referenced part of a BLP)
#* Removal of mention of a retraction {{Diff|Justin Stebbing|1065084148|next}}
I will need to find some time to check through the edits made by the SPAs properly, but from a first glance they are full of warning signs that they could be a combination of untrustworthy and unencyclopedic -- it may be that they just need rolling back in full. [[User:Steinsky|Joe D]] [[User talk:Steinsky|(t)]] 00:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
I will need to find some time to check through the edits made by the SPAs properly, but from a first glance they are full of warning signs that they could be a combination of untrustworthy and unencyclopedic -- it may be that they just need rolling back in full. [[User:Steinsky|Joe D]] [[User talk:Steinsky|(t)]] 00:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:02, 18 May 2024

Self promotion and bias

The following is from a person who hides their identity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.93.27.195 (talkcontribs) 12:44, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is comical. The amount of unnecessary statements, weak sources, and qualifications included in this article make it laughably poor. It is in major need of a rewrite, or possibly even deletion as I fail to see the necessity of having an article dedicated to the CV of an oncologist. Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, nor a monument to every single person's life's achievements, it is an encyclopedia. Mr anonymous username (talk) 20:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will need to find some time to check through the edits made by the SPAs properly, but from a first glance they are full of warning signs that they could be a combination of untrustworthy and unencyclopedic -- it may be that they just need rolling back in full. Joe D (t) 00:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]