User talk:Gogo Dodo

Smile!

WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

-WarthogDemon 01:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

So I see, judging from your talk page in my watchlist. O.o Here's hoping July is good. :D -WarthogDemon 01:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Recreating deleted page

Dear Dodo, I have recreated the CD Publishing page has thsi small indepednent publisher is newworthy for their role in the protest against the Iraq war. They were the only publishers that published the reprt on the trials before the Iraq Special Tribunal. Please let me knwo if this is a problem. Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertKaplan (talk • contribs)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 18:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: CD Publishing article deletion

I think we disagree over its notability. While I agree it has not been mentioned in books it was a features publisher at the London Book Show in 2005 and has been mentioned on several TV and radio programs. Is there any way we can get an independent assessment of this dispute? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertKaplan (talk • contribs)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 17:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for participating in my RfA. It was successful, and I am now, may God have mercy on us all, an administrator. Look at all the new buttons! I had heard about 'protect,' 'block user,' and 'delete,' but no one told me about 'kill,' 'eject,' and 'purée.' I appreciate the trust the community has in me, and I'll try hard not to delete the main page or block Jimbo. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Beauty and the Beast (2003 film)

I have just completed an article for a movie: Beauty and the Beast (2003 film). Could you give it a quick look over to make sure it's not missing anything major and is article-worthy? -WarthogDemon 00:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Think it has any chance? It does have links to 3 actors, though I know that links don't equal notability. Is there any other major sources I could look around for to help strengthen it? -WarthogDemon 00:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 03:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Shark attack

Thanks for the advice! Brianga 05:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Dave Messina: The Real Deal

Dear Godo Dodo, You recently deleted the page for the movie Dave Messina: The Real Deal because you said it was not "notable". In actuality, this movie is very notable. It was a notable independent film and of great pride to the people of New Britain. You see, this city does contribute a lot of art, but never has a movie been conceptualized, filmed, edited, and produced within this city. The premiere was a big deal and was very notable. I saw that on Wikipedia there was not much about New Britain except its own article and there was nothing on New Britain High School except a stub. Which I find very odd, since New Britain is an important city in Connecticut's history. So I created that article. You wanted sources so I have put the article back up this time with links at the bottom to its trailer, teaser, and official Myspace page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardhittin'06 (talk • contribs)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 03:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll Have To Make You Smile With Something More Than A Smile

WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Too bad you're not getting vandals who harrass me. There's one right now trying to do so and honestly I'm finding it slightly humorous. (Though at the same time I do empathize, as I have been in this vandal's place before, article wise.) Anyway, if you need cheering up, here's a page that ALWAYS gets me laughing: [1]. Enjoy. :) -WarthogDemon 04:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 20:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Apologies

Sorry, I will try to be more thorough when filling out possible vandalism reports. Again, sorry. Peace. Spartan-James 05:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 20:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Talk Pages & Redirects

You left a message for me on my talk page; I've posted a response. I thought I'd give you a heads-up.  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!) 19:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 20:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted Page As I Made An AfD

Not that I'm complaining, but you might as well delete [[2]] now. I thought it'd be okay to give that article a chance since I didn't know if Junior League was any chance of notability or not. -WarthogDemon 05:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Even if you had, it wouldn't have irritated me. I trust your judgment on these things. :) -WarthogDemon 05:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Thugman123

I am very sorry that I wrote the word bagels on stlye's wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thugman123 (talk • contribs)

You said you will block me does this mean just my account or my whole computer. -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thugman123 (talk • contribs).

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

All right thanks for answering my question user: gogo dodo. I will take what you said in to consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thugman123 (talk • contribs)

Thugman123

What is a sockpuppet, angus lepper--the bagel bandit A.K.A. Thugman123

Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. -- 01:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Moved from user page

hi, are you the same gogo dodo i used to know in sri lanka in 1992?

- sandipani gandipad —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 122.161.84.28 (talk • contribs).

Probably not. -- Gogo Dodo 20:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Thugman123 and User:Hpsander456

I noticed you dealing with the first of this pair — I'm suspicious about a possible connection between the two (possibly socks). Hpsander has "Wikipedians who like being thug" as a category on their page, in addition to the category "Wikipedians who hate being played like a sucker", which was also added to the userpage of Thugman123 by User:Frank Anchor (see User talk:Frank Anchor), which also raises the possibility of a connection there. The only three members of that category are Thugman123 (now removed), Frank Anchor, and Hpsander456. Also, Thugman123 and Hpsander456 seem similar in that their nicks end in the sequence of digits (123/456) and both have bizarre editing habits, with each having edits flippantly proclaiming their love of bagels and cake, respectively. I'm not sure what to do to officially raise the possibility of their being socks, and I'm also aware that sockpuppets are allowed so long as they aren't abused, so I don't want to do anything. I just thought it worth maybe keeping an eye on? Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 13:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Template

Did you delete the Bibliotheque sig template? If you didn't, please do so. --Bibliotheque 05:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:41, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

List of Mexicans

Thanks for the help! Poindexter Propellerhead 06:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Going Insane Over A Tag

When you find a sentence or paragraph that needs to be sourced, what tag do you use? I tried {{cite}}, {{source}}, and variations thereof but I can't find anything. I searched the templates and found nothing. I know such a thing exists . . . am I going mad or is it somewhere obvious that I can't see? -WarthogDemon 02:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 17:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. =) That was just driving me crazy. Nice cartoon as well to boot. O_o -WarthogDemon 19:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for telling me. Someone else did something to some article, writing about gnomes. Must have pushed the wrong button and put the warning on the wrong talk page. VK35 18:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 18:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks for watching over my user page - happy vandal hunting. Dust Filter 00:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo 00:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Mix up

I was protecting the talk page of the German...holocaust... vandal and accidentally undid your protection of the page. I reset it for 6 months, but I thought I'd drop you a line if you'd prefer a different duration. Sorry about that! --Fire Star 火星 00:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 00:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

You got to that change mere seconds before I did. Amazing! --omtay38 07:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo 07:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

No less of an opinion

My edit to Deadliest Catch is no less of an opinion than saying that the job may be the deadliest in the world. Seriously, does anyone think those lobster fishermen have a harder job than anyone that lives in a war torn nation? I doubt it. EdRooney

Vandalism sir?

Googoo doodoo, my recent additions to Wikipedia were not in any way executed in a malicious purpose. A virus in my computer has unfortunately compromised my typing by taking control sometimes, thus resulting in "blanked" and "chopped-up and mutilated" articles. please do not punish me administrator sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by E3992117 (talk • contribs)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Further Vandalism

To your knowledge, has an administrator ever assisted the the vandalism of an article? Today i came across at least a half dozen articles that have not been corrected. Is there a glitch in the security bots perhaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by E3992117 (talk • contribs)

vandalism mishap

that last comment was accidentaly placed in the wrong field and identified as vandalism on your page by another user, will this count against me in future edits? -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by E3992117 (talk • contribs).

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Sdk 813 and Da8 kd2

I was just about to block those two (I reverted all of their userpage edits), but you got there first. :) Kudos, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 06:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I suppose I missed out on the thrill and exhilaration of blocking a sockpuppet this time. :P I encountered the edits in essentially the same way. I was checking through recent category creations and noticed that multiple categories were being created for sockpuppets of editors whom I recognise – suffice it to say it piqued my interest. I would have blocked earlier but I was distracted by something over at WP:NPOV. As for your hope that he'll give up someday ... well, it just wouldn't be the same if blocked editors didn't continually try to evade blocks with numerous obvious sockpuppets for months after their indef-block, now would it? ;) That's probably enough abuse of WP:BEANS from me for today. Cheers, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 06:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, he was back at it just a few hours ago (see [3]). I also for the first time noticed the number of pages in Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of SummerThunder. Sad, indeed. -- Black Falcon ^(Talk) 05:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: protections. OK, will do. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 05:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Anonymous vandalism to Fish

I reverted vandalism to the article Fish last night. The vandalism was done by an anonymous user with the IP address 75.63.233.103. This is the vandalism:

The term "fish" is most precisely used to describe any non-tetrapod chordate, i.e., a human with a cap, has grillzs throughout life, and have gangsters, if any, in the shape of deodorant.

Savie Kumara 00:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Troublemaker

The user Basekid25 has blanked significant portions from the Dog, All the Stuff (And More!) Volume 1, and Stuff (cloth) articles. I have reverted these changes, and all the vandalism was done today. Basekid25 needs something or someone to stop him before he strikes again. Savie Kumara 21:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 22:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I have warned the vandal accordingly. Hope I didn't do anything bad by it. Savie Kumara 23:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 00:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Protection request

I think you should protect the page User talk:24.152.168.241, as 24.152.168.241 replaced the warning and block messages with 400 kb of attacks against Wikipedia. Hydrogen Iodide 08:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 08:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Warrior (wrestler) vandalism

Don't worry. I'll revert it. I've been trying to do so, but have been beaten every time. Savie Kumara 04:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Drat! Now I can't revert anything! I've tried multiple times to get just one revert in on that article, and now it's protected...=(( Maybe I can be referred to other active vandals...I'm an aspiring vandal fighter. Is there any way to arrange that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Savie Kumara (talk • contribs)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Variety

I did find a stub that I hope to get around to expanding the other day, called Flabellifera. And you're right. I should incorporate more variety in my contributions. I'll try to work on that. I just got quite a bit "Vandal-Fight-Happy" today, offering to take on multiple vandals' reverts. Savie Kumara 04:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Back again

User:Typocent would seem to be a sock of User:Doubtuser and User:Rangesoap, if you want to keep an eye on the Warrior (wrestler) talk page FlowerpotmaN·(t) 05:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Guys, let's keep a lookout for Rangesoap and his sockpuppets four days from now. If he's familiar with Wikipedia policy, he might make another sockpuppet, wait four days, and vandalize again. I have posted the same message on Flowerpotman's talk page.Savie Kumara 05:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Spam links

Thanks for that, if it keeps happening I now know where to go. I will add the link to my user page for future use. Mindys12345स्वागतम्! এই সভ্যজন অসমৰॐ शान्ति ! शान्ति !! शान्ति !!!

Extreme Group

I recently created a page that YOU deleted.. it's called Extreme Group. It wasn't doing anyhting wrong, seeing as I own all the copyrights anyways. You didn't even check! Whats going on??! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Extremeinternational (talk • contribs).

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 17:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for blocking User:Emd33 and for reverting their vandalism on my user page. Angel Of Sadness ^T/C 18:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 18:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Once Again Not A Problem

My pleasure. :) -WarthogDemon 20:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

The Bongwarrior hater vandalism

Thank you for your concern. If this happens again, I might make a different account to avoid his vandalism. I've already read the Sockpuppet policies. However, if I do make a new account, I'll use my old one until the new one is "official" and I can edit semi-protected pages and fix vandalism on them. I do not wish to provide any links between the two accounts if this happens, for security purposes. I've learned my lesson--never get involved when someone is vandalizing another user's pages out of hatred. Savie Kumara 22:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 23:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, my gosh. Some of that stuff was outright appalling, what with a picture of diseased...whatever. And I thought I got it bad... Savie Kumara 00:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Rodney burrell

I think I bit off a bit more than I can chew . . . can you handle this: Rodney burrell? -WarthogDemon 04:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I was a bit concerned that this was a sticky situation... -WarthogDemon 04:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

I hope I wasn't too harsh . . . I think I need a short wikibreak as I'm feeling like I'm being a rabid poochyena as of late. >.> Perhaps it's just my vigor. -WarthogDemon 04:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:58, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about disappearing. Decided to eat something and play some video games. The ice cream is appreciated though. =) -WarthogDemon

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmm . . . Curious

How old would an account need to be for me to take to MFD instead of AIV? One year? -WarthogDemon 23:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 23:15, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Whoops, I guess I was ambiguous . . . I mean like if there haven't been any edits made in a long time by the user in question. If I find another account like that on user and/or talk page, that hasn't been edited in over a year, should I send to MFD then? Just wanting to know if there's like a "inactive user" limit, so I know where to report. -WarthogDemon 23:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 23:22, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Got it, thanks for the heads up. :) -WarthogDemon 23:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the Userpage revert

Though there was a certain simple eloquence in having "YOU IS MEMBER OF SECT" on my page, thanks for the revert. We can't have people figuring out my true connection to this... I mean, fnord.--Isotope23 02:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

BaRiMzI

One can't but assume good faith in such cases, but it does tend to get irksome, especially after finding out that this is not the first time it happens. By the way, I blocked the spammer for 3 hours, just in case. Cheers! —Anas ^talk? 17:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 17:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it was probably a bad idea to block the IP. I didn't notice the date... I was sort of in a rush (busy with something else), so I assumed the spamming was recent.

Clouts self

Anyway, sorry for my late reply, and have a good day. :-) —Anas ^talk? 22:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 03:21, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for that. - Akamad 05:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo 20:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Userpage Repair

Thank you! Moonriddengirl 23:45, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo 02:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

How Come You Get All The Interesting Vandals?

Seriously, I am jealous. D: I also am a fan of LeAnn Rimes. Oh well, here's some ice cream back. -WarthogDemon 06:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I had to put this on your VISA. Hope you don't you mind. ;)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:48, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

The youtube video that person gave you was the music video "I Need You" by country singer LeAnn Rimes. And I just found that the single is currently redlink. I think I'll put it on my list of planned pages. Seems your vandal unintentionally helped. :) -WarthogDemon 15:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 03:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Request for Information.

Hello,

A while back, you left a note on my talk page stating you are available to help where possible. I was the subject of a recent RFA that did not succeed, and was wondering if you could provide some constructive feedback. Cheers, --Aarktica 16:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Sten

Please read the response I sent you before you revert it back.

Hello and kindest regards, The change as made to the Sten reference because of a transcript by the co-inventor Colonel Shepherd discussing how it was named when he received an Award from the Board of the Royal Commission Awards to inventors. Lord Cohen: Why was it called the Sten? Colonel Shepard It was called the Sten by the then Director General of Artillery. The S' was from my name, the T from Mr. Turpin who was my draughtsman and who did a very large amount of the design and the EN was for England. That is the origin of the name, for which I accept no responsibility. In my country we have say about even if people all believe one thing it doesn't make it true. Father Christmas does spring to mind in this context. If you can find me a contrary quote from either of the inventors I would consider that better evidence than this transcript. I welcome your response on this subject and to continue this dialog. Also any help you may give on how I might better edit this article to reflect the change would be appreciated.

Just a follow up. I beleive that Ian Hogg is one of the proponents of Enfield name theory of the Sten. As you yourself said " Hogg is a good person, but his books are chuck full of inaccuracies. It appears that he takes all of his information from seconday sources without first checking that they are right. I've noticed that he parrots the opinions and inaccuracies of others" I wholeheartedly agree on this point. I consider that a published interview would be a primary document. Better than any other source I've seen in my study of Stens. I enjoy our dialog and if ever in England i would extend an invitation to visit our collection of firearms we have several stens and on two badly rusted Sten derivatives from the Warsdaw Uprising. Oh by the way how silly the book is The Sten Machine Carbine By Peter Laidler ISBN 0-88935-259-3 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Polisheagle1939 (talk • contribs).

Email

You may have received an email from me; though if you haven't yet, things are in control now. -WarthogDemon 00:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

New article

Remember my NetObjects articles? Just to keep the saga running: Website_Pros.--Peter Eisenburger 16:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 19:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: your message on my talk page. Contrary to your feeling I thought it was too much critics in it... - I will consider your suggestion about cancelling the last paragraph.--Peter Eisenburger 20:08, 27 July 2007 (UTC) - and thanks for copyediting ;) P.

Some changes as reaction to your comment and (meanwhile deleted) tagging by another admin. Will you please review again, if you have the time? Thank you.--Peter Eisenburger 10:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Your message on my talk page and your edits. Great! And many thanks for your help. I too did the changes you recommended.--Peter Eisenburger 17:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Golden Tee

It seems we semi-protect conflicted. How did that happen? Acalamari 17:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 17:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Smile

Connell66 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 19:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

I just deleted the "hated" thing on your advice. Thanks. Connell66 19:58, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Your comment at WP:AIV

I concur. If the editor does not try to recreate the article I think the report should be removed. I left a message at User talk:Herrscythe to head things off at the pass. LessHeard vanU 20:02, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 20:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Herrscythe

Hi, you recently removed this user from the intervention against vandalism list. However, this user has now re-created the Regnum Umbra Ignis article, and is continuing to remove speedy delete templates. Please could you review your decision? Thanks. Oli Filth 20:24, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 03:56, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Along the River During Qingming Festival

I was trying to preview an image for my userpage using the same wide pattern that the Along the River During Qingming Festival image uses. I guess I should have been more careful with the preview button. I'll use the sandbox in the future. Regards, Patrick Brogan 04:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your note and my best wishes for the day, :-) Patrick Brogan 04:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Bond 22

You're quick, you beat me to both of those reversions. good job! DurinsBane87 05:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 08:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Your User Page

As always, my pleasure. =) -WarthogDemon 21:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

I hope I didn't accidentally bite him. -WarthogDemon 06:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 16:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Once again you're welcome for the revert. :) That was rather interesting actually; last night I had a strange dream that I was on Wikipedia and asked you a question. For some reason you didn't respond, but rather indefinitely blocked both your and my accounts. Hope that's not prophetic. :D -WarthogDemon 21:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 07:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Maybe it was about Ho-Oh. :P -WarthogDemon 07:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 18:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Angels template

Hello, I've suggested someting in the Template talk:Angels, I'd rather ask you than start changing Angels' players articles to the Template:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim roster.

If you agree, let's change! (sorry, 201.34.173.138 00:42, 4 August 2007 (UTC))

Replied on the Template Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Al Roker

I just received a message from you saying that some of my edits to the Al Roker page were not constructive. I'm not really sure how that could be possible, as they are all true. If it's a matter of them not being sourced, then I apologize and I'll get sources ASAP. However, most of the information on the page is unsourced and, by that logic, should be removed. If not, then the reverts seem awfully arbitrary. I guess I'm just looking for some clarification. Thanks very much. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.218.172.59 (talk • contribs).

You are welcome to re-add in your additions if you can location sources for it. I rather doubt that you will. -- Gogo Dodo 03:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good. I'll get on that. In the meantime, does that mean that all non-resourced additions should be taken down? Or, do the bland lies get preference over the outlandish truth? I think that "Ripley's Believe It or Not" showed us all that the most bizarre things are often fact. I'll get on removing the non-sourced facts immediately. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.218.172.59 (talk • contribs).

deleted: Fake Problems

Hi; you were the third to mistakenly delete the "Fake Problems" article. In fact, Fake Problems is a highly significant rock band, on the same label as Against Me!. thanks -bK.

BenjiInATree 10:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 17:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Re. Detinspection

Sorry, didn't check the history! I was wondering when that was going to happen though! I was going to report the name but found that I had to discuss it first but now it looks like that won't be needed =) Thanks, SMC89 ^{( talk • contribs )} 08:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 08:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Re. Thanks

No problem at all, there's been a few nasty comments today...just reverted one off my own talk page! Not to mention discovering some usernames created as personal attacks against me a while back. Nice to know that some civil people still exist =P Cheers, SMC89 ^{( talk • contribs )} 09:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 18:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Impersonator

Just to let you know, you had an impersonator going around pretending to "block" people. 71.112.235.59 (talk · contribs) was using your name as a signature. T Rex | talk 06:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Hehe, its no biggie. T Rex | talk 07:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Balloons

Hi, I'm a bit confused, what are the balloons for?[4] --Elonka 08:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 18:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I was a bit confused as to why you were giving me balloons until I saw this, now that was funny. Don't worry, I had been blocked before by [5] and it wasn't a fake one. :) --_Hdt83 ^Chat 08:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Indefinite blocks sure are less indefinite than I thought. Thanks for the balloons. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 18:11, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

BenQ

Hi there; I have restored this page, and I appreciate your asking rather than just doing it yourself. I must confess to a weakness here, in that I think the total of 122 {{hang on}} tags may have diminished for me the apparent value of the article. My bad. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 18:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

P.S. I chose not to restore the tags!! --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 18:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

You Are Welcome And Thank You

For showing me in your contribs ([6]) what to do if you accidentally mistype a reason for reverting something. [7] You have unintentionally been quite the teacher for me. :) -WarthogDemon 19:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

=)

Savie Kumara has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

You said on my talk page a month ago that getting your pages vandalized is a side effect of fighting vandalism. I've looked at that message to calm myself when my talk page got vandalized today. Savie Kumara 23:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 03:34, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Harper Lee

Thanks for your tireless efforts to protect the Harper Lee article. I have just requested semi-protection for it, so with a little luck it will not be vandalised so often. Take care, and if you ever need any help, please feel free to call on me. Jeffpw 06:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 22:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Wow, And I Mean WOW....

Where did you find this coprophagic vandal?!? -WarthogDemon 17:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 17:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I've noticed, as all my archive pages are on my watchlist. :) Though considering our respective userpages and talk pages are also on my list the archives were tough to spot as the watchlist was changing a mile a minute. =O This has been quite an interesting few days. First a run in with an imitator of a renowned Wikisockpuppet, and now this... At any rate, thanks for the protections? :) Wondering though are the archive protections permanent? As I didn't see any expiration date for them plus, if they're permanent it would remove the need to keep every archive on my watchlist... -WarthogDemon 17:43, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

One last note, hope my edit summaries/commentary was acceptable . . . I figured insanity at this level needed some slight comic relief to negate the hellish side effects. =) -WarthogDemon 18:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 19:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I see. :) Well hope I helped. Not real sure how many reverts I got in; usually I got beaten to the punch but hopefully I wasn't in the way. :) Thanks again for everything. :) (And on a side note, for some reason your comment on my page was invisible until I made a minor edit to it...) -WarthogDemon 19:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I also see you've checked my contribs and saw my failed attempts at formatting. I really ought to use the Preview button more often. (At least I've made it so I don't forget edit summaries.) -WarthogDemon 19:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 19:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

In relation to this very matter, thank you very much for my barnstar - 'tis the first I have received, and I seriously appreciate it ;) _TheIslander 20:02, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo 23:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your assistance. I know realise that not all of my archive pages were on my watchlist, which is very odd. I am glad that you took care of this and brought it to my attention. Regards, Ground Zero | t 20:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo 23:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the protection!

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page, and then going one better and protecting it! :) Good thing reverting vandalism is a (very sensible) exception to the WP:3RR; that anon was hitting the "Undo" like nobody's business. Thanks again. ~ Danelo 21:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo 23:35, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Moseley and Santana

Thanks for directing me to the quote by Scioscia. But there's no way that Santana is going to be ready to start on two days rest on Monday and the article says nothing about Moseley. It seems likely that he'll get the start on Monday. For now, there's no reason to take Moseley out of the list of starting pitchers. How about we just leave a 6-man rotation until it all gets sorted out next week? --Sanfranman59 06:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:27, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

86.62.20.38 Query

I just saw on Recent Changes that you blocked User:86.62.20.38 for a year. Why a year, may I ask? Biggest IP block I've seen was for 3 months I think. Just curious. :) -WarthogDemon 05:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:51, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Is there any way for me to tell if an IP is a proxy/bot? (I'm assuming that's what you meant by "proxy block.") If it'd be possible for me to tell which IPs they are, I'd be able to report them. Should I come across one. :) And thanks for answering. :) -WarthogDemon 05:55, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Ariel♥Gold gives you a huge smile, Very nice! Thank you for doing that vandalbot work, I was going to gather all those into a summary if needed, you saved me that work! Thanks tons Gogo Dodo! (Love the name, btw)! Smiles promote WikiLove, and hopefully hers has made your day better. You can smile at someone else by adding {{subst:smile}}, whether it is someone you have had disagreements with in the past, or a good friend. Happy day!

^Ariel♥Gold 06:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)