Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 September 9: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:42, 9 September 2007

< September 8	September 10 >

September 9

Template:Jason Michael Carroll

Redundant template; only has three links. Each of these pages is already linked to the other, so the template serves no purpose at all.. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 21:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:POV Russia

WP:POINTy -- 21:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Personal attack striked out. Digwuren 21:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to comment on my wording but only I will strike anything out from it. --Irpen 21:19, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you feel that way, but your comments on Wikipedia are not yours, they're Wikipedias. However, in case you have concerns of being connected to a TfD nomination that has only one non-personal attack word, I have now also generously striken out your signature next to the nomination. Digwuren 21:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to report my comments at any board you like for other users to judge how warranted they are but only I will strike them out. Besides, if my comment was inappropriate, which it obviously is not, it would only damage my attempt to delete this nonsense template that you want to keep. --Irpen 21:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the parts previously striked out, under WP:RPA, and will use the appropriate board to report the violation. Digwuren 21:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. First of all, would you PLEASE stay civil. Thank you. Second of all. It was not done in bad faith. It is not intended to be pointy. It's not racist. It is just a clarifying template. We have lost many good editors. Russian, Estonian and everywhere else aswell. Just because of disputes like that. The template is intendend to clarify the scope of the dispute. And to warn editors to be ready for the dispute itself. It also calls for working towards NPOV for giving the russian version of the events equal weight. Suva 21:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- So, what next clarification of disputes in template are we to see? "Disputed neutrality towards the Baltic nationalist version of history"? "Russophobic version"? "Zionist version"? "Antisemitic version"? Obviously created to inflame matters. --Irpen 21:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - It is created for articles where someone disputes the content claiming that it doesn't match with his russian sources (for example the old saying that it was liberation not occupation). When the article doesn't represent the russian POV with enough weight but presents colliding (western) version of history. You can't really deny that this is not like something new in wikipedia where western and russian versions of history disagree. Suva 21:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Wikipedia has many disputes based on sources' have a institutional bias clash. Arab vs Israeli, libertarian vs authoritarian, feminist vs antifeminist. Besides, it is not Western vs Russian. Sources are rather diverse everywhere and Russia is not the "Eastern" country. --Irpen 21:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chaebol nav templates (part 2)

All red link farms, and/or with no more than three blue links each (in both the Dongkuk and KT templates, one of those blue links is a redirect to another, so they only really link to two articles). The articles are all sufficiently interlinked anyway, so these templates serve no meaningful navigation purpose. No objection to recreating them when/if they become viable. PC78 20:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Palestinian Authority muni

Delete. Standardized to {{Infobox Settlement}} and upgraded to include maps when possible. — MJCdetroit 17:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 19:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. See original reply to closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Singu larity 20:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Needs film infobox

Template has been superceded by "needs infobox" parameter of Template:Film and all working instances of the old template have been deprecated to the new format. — Girolamo Savonarola 19:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as Template:Film is a worthy replacement, handling this parameter as well as several others. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 19:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, same reason. Cop 663 20:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no longer needed. --Beloved Freak 21:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CompactTOC8T

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Moved to different location, redirected to {{CompactTOC8}}. Circeus 20:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template was forked from {{CompactTOC8}} with a new, clever functionality, which is now part of the other template, and all 3 uses have been converted. Circeus 18:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moot: Moved to Template:CompactTOC8/Dev1; it was clearly intended as a development sandbox for improvements to Template:CompactTOC8; there is at least one bug extant in its code (see last topic, as of this writing, on my talk page for details), so it should not be slated for deletion right now. When the bug is resolved and the fixed code implemented at Template:CompactTOC8, /Dev1 will be tagged for speedy deletion. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 19:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, I located and fixed that bug (I was accidentally using #ifeq: instead of #if:). Circeus 20:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Right now, I'm converting {{CompactTOC6}}instances, many of which could actually be just {{CompactTOC}} (except for missing letters, which #6 does not handle anyway). Circeus 20:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Goguryeo Infobox

Single purpose infobox which is currently subst'd in the article it was created for (Goguryeo), and consequently has no transclusions. — PC78 17:36, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arab-Israeli conflict 2002

This template seems to be redundant to the better designed {{Campaignbox Al aqsa}}. I also recommend that {{Campaignbox Al aqsa}} be renamed {{Campaignbox Second Intifada}} to maintain consistency with the main entry. — Tewfik^Talk 09:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:JohnnyMrNinja/Lame password

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result of the debate was moved to MfD, the appropriate place for this type of request. Sebi _[talk] 09:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, I'd like to ask you something. Do we need a userbox that says "yeah I have a crappy password that you could probably guess, but just because it's weak don't try it!" That's just asking for trouble. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 03:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

? I can't tell if this is serious... it seems serious but it can't be. Did someone really put something in my userspace up for TfD because they thought using it was unsafe? 1)MfD is the place for that 2)I think there should be a valid reason to delete someone's userspace 3)it's so obviously a joke it scares me that someone could not see that. It pisses me off that I have to defend my userspace from my phone on a saturday night. At least leave a message on my talkpage before this if no disrespect is meant. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 06:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Anime episode nav templates

Orphaned some time ago, these episode succession templates have remained unused. --Farix (Talk) 03:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, almost housekeeping. -- Ned Scott 04:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Poisen

Duplicate of Template:Poison, complete with misspelling. — cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 02:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to {{poison}}, not transcluded on any mainspace pages. Sebi _[talk] 03:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant and misspelled. -- JHunterJ 11:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ==== [[Template:POV Russia]] ====
 :{{lt|POV Russia}}
-[[WP:POINT]]y inflammatory bad-faith template saying
+[[WP:POINT]]y -- 21:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
-:''"The neutrality of this article <u>towards Russian version of Soviet history<u> is disputed."''
-This template with racist overtones <u>for article tagging</u> was created by the user with history of creation such disruptive templates (see [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Notpropaganda]].) --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 21:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 ::Personal attack striked out. [[User:Digwuren|Digwuren]] 21:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 :::You are free to comment on my wording but only I will strike anything out from it. --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 21:19, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 ::::I'm sorry you feel that way, but your comments on Wikipedia are not yours, they're Wikipedias.  However, in case you have concerns of being connected to a TfD nomination that has only one non-[[WP:NPA|personal attack]] word, I have now also generously striken out your signature next to the nomination. [[User:Digwuren|Digwuren]] 21:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 :::::You are free to report my comments at any board you like for other users to judge how warranted they are but only I will strike them out. Besides, if my comment was inappropriate, which it obviously is not, it would only damage my attempt to delete this nonsense template that you want to keep. --[[User:Irpen|Irpen]] 21:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
+::::::I have removed the parts previously striked out, under [[WP:RPA]], and will use the appropriate board to report the violation. [[User:Digwuren|Digwuren]] 21:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 *'''Speedy keep'''. First of all, would you PLEASE stay civil. Thank you. Second of all. It was not done in bad faith. It is not intended to be pointy. It's not racist. It is just a clarifying template. We have lost many good editors. Russian, Estonian and everywhere else aswell. Just because of disputes like that. The template is intendend to clarify the scope of the dispute. And to warn editors to be ready for the dispute itself. It also calls for working towards NPOV for giving the russian version of the events equal weight. [[User:Suva|Suva]] 21:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)