User talk:Redvers: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 48h) to User talk:Redvers/Archive23. |
→Attitude: new section |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|48px|left]]An article that you have been involved in editing, [[The 4-Hour Workweek]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/{{{2|The 4-Hour Workweek}}}]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:adw --> [[User:Busy Stubber|Busy Stubber]] ([[User talk:Busy Stubber|talk]]) 03:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|48px|left]]An article that you have been involved in editing, [[The 4-Hour Workweek]], has been listed for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/{{{2|The 4-Hour Workweek}}}]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:adw --> [[User:Busy Stubber|Busy Stubber]] ([[User talk:Busy Stubber|talk]]) 03:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Attitude == |
|||
Regarding your recent edit to [[BBC Three]], where you left the comment "Shameful how much rubbish, speculation and easily-confirmed truth haunt this article. Some sources, please.". Please, drop the attitude. This is Wikipedia; facts without citations are to be expected. Of course we should be trying to fix that, of course an article like [[BBC Three]] should be tagged as you did, but it's most certainly not "shamefull". There is no need for such a negative slant in comments; much better to leave a simple "tagged as needing sources" comment than that shown above. [[User:TheIslander|<sub><font color="DarkGray">'''The'''</font></sub><font color="Blue">'''Islander'''</font>]] 20:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:39, 30 December 2007
Redvers is male • gay • married • a socialist • a vegetarian • Welsh • an atheist • and train heave on to Euston
|
Masha Archer
Masha Archer should be removed from Jewelry designer category --not enough credentials---
Redvers, I see you are against adverts and vanity articles per your page here. So, why then might I ask did you take away my nomination for speedy deletion? There are SO many designers in this category with tons of credentials other than belly dancing and this article does not happen to be one. There are thousands of graduates of her school. Does that make her a goldsmith or jewelry designer?
Examples:
- Archibald Knox - Isle of Man (Deceased)
- Sybil Dunlop, London(Deceased)
- Jean Gouldon, Paris(Deceased)
- Alan Revere, US (Living founded Revere academy)
- Patt Flynn, US (Living)
- Arlene Fisch, US(Living)
All the time I spend here is in the goal of making all these notable peoples bios possible and not have adverts. Do you know of any of these people? Could you possibly think to ask me about it in the future? Thanks, archiemartin Archiemartin (talk) 00:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey, thanks for protecting my userpage! I wonder who that vandal was. Anyway, thanks very much, and happy holidays! JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 02:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Notification of discussion: SVG trademarks
I notice you nominated {{SVG-Trademark}} for TfD (Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007_May_7#Template:SVG-Trademark). That same issue is being discussed again at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content#SVG Logos, so I thought I'd drop you a line and give you the chance to weigh in. Dylan (talk) 20:13, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of The 4-Hour Workweek
An article that you have been involved in editing, The 4-Hour Workweek, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 4-Hour Workweek. Thank you. Busy Stubber (talk) 03:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Attitude
Regarding your recent edit to BBC Three, where you left the comment "Shameful how much rubbish, speculation and easily-confirmed truth haunt this article. Some sources, please.". Please, drop the attitude. This is Wikipedia; facts without citations are to be expected. Of course we should be trying to fix that, of course an article like BBC Three should be tagged as you did, but it's most certainly not "shamefull". There is no need for such a negative slant in comments; much better to leave a simple "tagged as needing sources" comment than that shown above. TheIslander 20:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)