User talk:Gogo Dodo

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here. When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind: Use a descriptive subject/headline. If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to. Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless... If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section. Click here to leave me a message

Reversion

You are welcome, anything to help a fellow wikipedian. Blueanode- helping to make wikipedia a place (talk) 19:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

d00d.

y u delete me bro?

this is not cool. u shud not delate me. i has rite to free speach. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatguyisme (talk • contribs) 20:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

i love you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatguyisme (talk • contribs)

Message from Zantoz

Why did you cancelled my page? I worked sp hard making it! :'( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zantoz (talk • contribs)

Replied on your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning up my userpage, but no need to worry about it - if anything I rather liked the Zantoz comments, I was even proud that my efforts at tagging and reverting his vandalism was annoying him enough to have a go at my page! Gaffertape (talk) 02:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Nowhere near clever enough to note the replies on my talk page, but will do something about my userpage tomorrow (it's getting a bit late here, playing with vandals is getting very addictive). Gaffertape (talk) 02:52, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

I usually do move comments when I notice they've been placed on the wrong page, but I'm just a bit lazy tonight...and probably not assuming good faith enough. Most recent edits may prove my suspicions ..but I should still fix it right or not at all. Thanks for the message. Have a good weekend. --Onorem♠Dil 03:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Warnings

hey man I would appreciate it if you did not post spam on my user page as I do not post spam on yours. a humble request from your good friend. -me — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.54.12.0 (talk • contribs)

hey man thats just not cool ;( peace in the middle east. my user page is my own and i believe it should not be vandalized. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.54.12.0 (talk) 04:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

The warnings are not spam, anonymous IP user pages are generally not owned nor was it vandalized. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your reverts on my user page

Thanks for reverting the vandalism attempts on my user page. It is greatly appreciated. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 07:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Survivor

You had reverted one of my changes while I was fixing the rest of the Survivor pages. They are fully compliant now to US date coding. Sorry I didn't finish them all at the same time. I'll try and do better when making changes to an entire series. Thank you.KellyAna (talk) 00:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Actually, upon further reading of the docs for {{Infobox Television}}, which the Survivor Infobox is based upon, your formatting is correct and I made a mistake in reverting you. Sorry about that.

On a side note, the date is automagically formatted per your date preference setting (another thing I learned reading the docs). So while the dates might be in one format, if you change your user preferences, the format changes. I did make one minor change to all of your corrections in that I added a comma and space between the day and year for easier reading when editing the Infobox. The bunched up brackets made it hard to read. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem and thank you for taking the time and common courtesy (sometimes not seen) to give a nice edit summary and explain why you made the changes you did. I find far too often people don't say "you were right, but this looks easier to read." It is nice to work with another editor who not only accepts changes but also compliments others' changes with their own additions. Thank you. KellyAna (talk) 01:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! NHRHS2010 talk 11:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. I woke up this morning and found that my page history said that someone blanked my page when I was sleeping. NHRHS2010 talk 22:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Trenton, Ontario

Thank you for your help on this article and with dealing with the associated userpage vandalism. Unfortunately, it appears the same user is back and using a different IP (205.189.25.213). He's left my userpage alone so far, but I'm about to RV the changes for the third time. Do you think it might be possible to semi-protect the page? Thanks. Blotto adrift (talk) 20:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

As always, thanks for your help on my talk page. I'm going to assume the troll was spawned from this discussion, so I left it under Trenton. Thanks! Snowfire51 (talk) 22:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. Yup, it's related to the Trenton article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

The page is simply incorrect. However Blotto adrift believes he has an monopoly over it. When several different users correct it he complains to an admin and you block IP address'. Please if you are going to block someone in the future please look into BOTH sides. The trenton ontario page is incorrect and it will stay that way until you stop siding with Blotto Adrift. This is not the only page users have complained about Blotto adrift changing. I am here to help wikipedia by correcting mistakes. This will only improve this sites poor view. However if admins do not look into the actions of all users this site will only go down hill. Blocking based on providing correct information is sad.

?? same user?? Sorry several users have change the page. Look into Blotto adrifts history. He changes many pages to reflect his edits and does not like it when people correct him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.65.118 (talk) 00:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

The issue is not incorrect information, but non-notable information. You are not "correcting" information, you are adding non-notable information. You say that "several different users" are inserting this non-notable academic, but I'm fairly sure you and these "different users" are the same person. As has been pointed out in the Talk page for the article, the person is not notable for inclusion on Wikipedia. If you can show why this person is notable, you are welcome to re-add it, but so far, you have not done so and therefore the entry will be removed.

You also state that Blotto adrift has other edits that people have complained about and I do not see evidence of that. In fact, his edits show that his has let others edit the article without reverting it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

- again incorrect - do a search on scholar portal, if you went to university you would know what this is. Also I am not the same person, if anything I think you are blotto. Please see wiki for conflict of interest guidelines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.65.118 (talk) 01:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I am quite aware of what academic publishing is like and you have provided no proof that the person is notable. Merely having a Ph. D. does not mean that somebody is notable. As for your assertion that I am Blotto adrift, well, you are very wrong. I have no conflict of interest issues related to Blotto adrift or the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

it appears that you do not know what scholarly work is. if you did you would have access to scholars portal and look up J Mickelakos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.65.118 (talk) 01:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

It's not my job to look up the info. That is your job if you want him included on Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:43, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I ask for wikipedia to be correct

This is all I ask for. You have not followed the outline that wikipedia states. Instead you decide to edit at will. This is the problem.

please do not delete my responces. They contain the proof you seek. Why are you acting like a child? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.65.118 (talk) 01:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

For reverting vandalism to my user page. --John (talk) 22:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

New Survivor issue

As my understanding goes, words like "voted out" are to be lower case when considered in a sentence 1st voted out verses 1st Voted Out. Someone changed that and several other things today, a random IP address. What are your thoughts? I can make the changes to all to be consistent. I don't mind. Let me know what you think. KellyAna (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

It should probably be lower case if you're referring to the table entries since "Voted Out" is not a title or position one can hold (though Sole Survivor is). You're welcome to change it, but it is probably not that big of a deal to change. As for the random IP address, he's not really random as I know who that is. That's an editor that often does not sign in to his account before editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, now I'm questioning Wikifying these pages. I ran into an editor with Survivor ownership issues. I'll work on it for Wikipedia but I may have to slap someone in the process. LOL!! KellyAna (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I saw the changes and the discussion that ensued regarding that. I agree with the others that the link from Cirie to the season's article was inappropriate at the time, but now that you have revised her article, the link is fine. I don't think there were necessarily any ownership issues with the article either. My experiences with all of the editors involved in the discussion thread is that are quite open to changes. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

My User Page

Thank you GoGo DoDo for reverting contentious vandalism done on my page. Thank you very much, you are quite the contributor! GodFather1921 14:59 10 January 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

LaRussa

How are sure it's not him on Deadliest Catch? Tony LaRussa isn't a on an Alaskan boat in the wintertime? What do you think he does during the off season to keep his mind sharp for baseball? There was a KMOX story about this recently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EdRooney (talk • contribs) 22:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Glad to be back!

Gogo, I can't believe the crap that continues to flow into this site. It needs all the help it can get. Heck, not even the current administrators seem to be able to agree on what should stay and what should go. Take a look at my talk page to see what I mean.

In any event, I greatly and deeply appreciate the welcome-home. Given the fact that I have to stay active to contribute to Veropedia, I figured I can be of some help around here, even without the mop and bucket.

Take care and stay in touch. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

{{archive box}}

I was to hasty in changing the code. I was just attempting to reflect what the documentation said. It was not until recently that I read the talk page, which I should have done sooner, and saw the reason it was changed in the first place. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Can't i

So, i can't create an article about my best friend? (Flaminor (talk) 18:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC))

Replied on your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

... for your help. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

From me also. Blotto adrift (talk) 02:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

You're both welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Las Vegas

I have had one of the worst days in a year so I could be completely missing it, and cyber slap me if you must, but you made some edits to the Las Vegas TV Series page with "copy edit" as the summary. If you wouldn't mind, could you expound on that? KellyAna (talk) 07:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry to hear that you had a bad day. You need some ice cream. =) You kind of lost me on your question though. I think you are asking about the meaning of the edit summary, not the edits themselves. It's in reference to copy editing. It's kind of like "cleanup", but perhaps not as extensive. I use it as a shorthand instead of saying something like "move space to the correct side of the period, lower case a letter". Usually I mark the edit as minor, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:54, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I need cheese cake I think. I just watch the Las Vegas page and saw you did some edits and am so racked today that they got me a little confused. So to understand, you didn't remove or change content, you cleaned it up and took out the trash. Does that sum it up?? And to briefly sum up the bad day....the payroll "person" at our mergered company keyed my account number in based on her "guess" so my paycheck is floating in bank system limbo rather than sitting in my account. To me that means bad day but I'm still plugging along and being nicer than ever tonight. KellyAna (talk) 08:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

How do you know its an implausible typo?

I typed them by accident (cause I'm drunk as holy hell), and thats what inspired me. I dont necessarily like cement, but if someone wants to find somethin on it, I thought I'd give em an old push in the right direction.Cement Cement Cement Cement Cement Cement Cement (talk) 23:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Sholiyarkal

Dear Gogo dodo the previous page on "sholiyarkal" was a bundle of abolute nonsense. we do not want wikipedia to be used by terrorists and fringe elements to conduct vilificatory campaigns. May i persuade you to completely do away with that page in the interests of ethics. I may be liking to refer the case to cyber police(FBI). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.113.59 (talk) 13:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't see the article as being absolute nonsense. It's poorly formatted, but not nonsense. I will not delete the page. I also recommend that you read no legal threats. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi

dear gogo dodo,

i was hoping if you could help me. im new in wikipedia and i dont know how things go on aroud here. i dont know how to upload nor edit pages. maybe you could help me.

thanks, Ronalsantoz (talk) 19:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

dear gogo dodo,

i really wanted to thank you 'cause i didnt knew how to do anything! hahahahahah. well, thanks for your time the courtesy of responding my message thank you soo much.

Sincerily,

Ronalsantoz (talk) 00:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

mason middle school so called 'revisions'

hey man, some people actually like to see what's there, who teachers are, arts, accomplishments, etc. what makes u think u can just delete HALF OF THE THING!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by AznMadness42 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

i ask one thing, and only 1 thing, i promise

can i just add the part in arts saying my and my friends got into jr all-state and not have to worry about it being deleted? its under arts as part of orchestra, pls respond. lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by AznMadness42 (talk • contribs) 04:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

RE:Thanks

No problem, Ive noticed youve had a little increase lately, means your doing something right ;-) Hope all is well!
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 06:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

"Knock on wood," haha yeah he has at least stayed away from the obvious pages and I am content with that. It has been nice getting back to expanding the 'pedia without having to deal with him. Hopefully we've seen the last of it. With all the crap that he brought to the Favre article, the page has kinda spiraled out of control, hopefully after the season is over we can do a rewrite and get the page up to FA-Class. Well keep up the good vandal work (229 is a pretty impressive number ;-) Have a good day/night!
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 07:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Jeez another notch, thats 230 lol! Haha yeah times does fly fast!
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 19:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Haha no problem ;-)
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 06:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

(de-indent)Haha yeah well such as life!
Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 04:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Wonderllama12 speaking!

Hello...I am sorry to see your page has been vandalized over 200 times. I wish you luck on doing whatever you have to do! Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wonderllama12 (talk • contribs) 03:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Gracias

Thanks for the help again on my edit page, and sorry the sockpuppetroll is trying to take it out on you, now. That's really a foolish thing to do, since you're an admin. Oh well, I guess if he were smart enough to think it through, he would have already stopped. Thanks anyway! Snowfire51 (talk) 06:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Request

If you're still about, I'm having an awful time over at Philip Brady (broadcaster). There's an editor over there who refuses to stop reverting the page to an unreferenced version which clearly violates WP:BLP. He won't stop, and won't discuss it. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at it. Thanks! Snowfire51 (talk) 06:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Warnings

Question straight to the source. How many warnings should you give to someone before you report them? Example of Shairia, you beat me to the punch fixing it, but something so clearly vandalism shouldn't even get the one in my book, but I don't want to waste your guys time reporting them if you can't do anything until they get X number of warnings, so as to be fair to those who make an honest mistake. Much obliged.Brinlong (talk) 19:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Bulgarian Shepherd Dog

I am the representative of Semperviva and I made an article which was deleted. This is very strange. The message told me that I was violating copyrights, which can not be because the article is from our hand. All, the article and the pictures are own by our organization. So my question is what wend wrong and please could you help me? Below the Wiki message

Regards,

John Zeiner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karak1 (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Juggernaut999, Other Affairs

Through some investigation, I have discovered that Juggernaut999 did in fact inserted blatantly fake contents into Wikipedia articles. The fake contents in question bears striking similarity to vandal ColourWolf. This makes Juggernaut999 a sockpuppet, and he should be banned.

Also, I wanted to ask you about another business. I have been editing here for a while now, and I was wondering what I should do from now on to work at getting an adminship. Thanks! Arbiteroftruth (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Edmonton Investors Group Limited Partnership

I have removed the information on the shareholders other occupations.

Before updating with the new list of investors, there was a 6 year old table which was outdated. I updated the information on the shareholders, which as a fan of the hockey club people want to know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike oootside of edmonton (talk • contribs) 19:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I updated the page to not include the "jobs' of the investors. The shareholders were already on the page, although it was 7 years old. All I have done is update the page. To remove a factual table seems absurd to me, to edit parts out of the table would seem more appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike oootside of edmonton (talk • contribs) 19:08, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Arbitrary number?

All of the shareholders were listed, as according to their position as stated on public record? As wikipedia is a public forum, I am sure that a local contributor can clean up this particuliar pasge. I have had one edit from North Carolina & who knows where you are from????

Mike oootside of edmonton (talk) 19:22, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Confused

The whole point of the edit is that the table is dated - the number of shares held by the individuals has change in the past 7 years. It is documented in the reference that 6 individuals have 9.14% of the shares, it is undocumented the number of shares held by the other investors. While listening to the radio in Edmonton today, this particuliar page was referenced & it was said to be inaccurate due to the age of the document & the fact that it has not been updated in some time. That is why I have been trying to update the page, with the list of investors, people are using the facts put on this page, so they might as well see an updated shareholder list. Skyreach equipment doesn't even have shares any longer?!?!? To be taken as people need to be able to see the corrected list. I cannot understand why you wouldn't just fix the apparent problem, instead of making me edit the thing each time....

Mike oootside of edmonton (talk) 01:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:44, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank-you

Exactly, I didn't want my 4 hours of typing to go to waste. I will try to update the table with percentages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike oootside of edmonton (talk • contribs) 14:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

turn changers

turn changers are real and we built one. it should be able to have a page. just because it doesn't help you doesn't mean it won't help other people. other people know about them and might want to know more about them and that's why we made this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Turnchangers (talk • contribs) 22:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

As in adminship...?

Hi, Gogo. Actually, I'm not sure I do want it back. I did leave in good stead and I asked to have the mop and bucket taken back. It just caused me too many headaches, hassles and humiliation at the hands of some really nasty users of this site. I admit it would be fun to be able to shut down the nonsense again, but the last thing I need is some troll yelling "admin abuse" with every deleted bit of nonsense. However, I am genuinely flattered that you'd make the offer. Perhaps later. I'm adminning three other wikis, but they're a lot quieter than this little slice of the internet.  :) Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Bless you, my friend. I just left a scathing message on a vandal's talk page. This clown really made me wish I had the adminship back just for the sheer pleasure of being able to block his sorry behind. Naturally, I'll be the one to get a "no personal attacks" warning.  :) C'est la vie. I just reported him to the anti-vandalism site, so it's a matter of time before he goes away. I just blew my stack when I saw what he'd done. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Stop!

You keep beating me to the reverts! 74.133.9.95 (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that. =) Thank you for the barnstar. It's an honor to receive one. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Heh, you deserved it! That rollback button helps I bet! 74.133.9.95 (talk) 21:51, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I don't use the rollback as much as I do the revert command in popups. It has to do with the fact that the rollback isn't available in Recent Changes. And I'm so used to using popups, it's become reflexive for me.

I'm sure somebody else has asked you before, but have you considered creating an account? It would be much easier to keep track of your edits, use the various tools available for vandalism reverting, and leaving you messages. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

I had one once, it wasn't too much of a difference, though I do miss the ability to create articles! I tend to pop in an out so editing as an IP fits. I'm editing from a static IP address (or at least a dynamic one that does not change very often!) so it's no big deal. And I'm pretty good about checking back for replies. :) 74.133.9.95 (talk) 00:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Just thought I'd ask just in case. =) There are a few other around that edit a lot with static IPs like 68.39.174.238 (talk · contribs). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikiprojects

I am making a Wikiprojects page. I was wondering if you knew how to make a member partcipant box, like the ones you have on your user page on the right side? If anyone else knows how please leave a message. -Blackwatch21.Blackwatch21 (talk) 14:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello Gogo

House1090 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) is a sockpuppet abuser I've been dealing with for awhile [1], currently active again as Snowlover1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). I've been taking these to User:Alison, but she seems to be on break. Would you please handle this for me? Thanks, Amerique^dialectics 14:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)