User talk:Jimknock: Difference between revisions
Welcome |
Caspian blue (talk | contribs) →Your violation on the rule of Liancourt Rocks: new section |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
I also noticed that you have been editing articles on Tibet-related topics. You may be interested in joining [[WP:TIBET|WikiProject Tibet]], a group of editors working to improve coverage of Tibet and Tibetan Buddhism on Wikipedia. Again, welcome! --[[User:Gimme danger|Gimme danger]] ([[User talk:Gimme danger|talk]]) 18:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC) |
I also noticed that you have been editing articles on Tibet-related topics. You may be interested in joining [[WP:TIBET|WikiProject Tibet]], a group of editors working to improve coverage of Tibet and Tibetan Buddhism on Wikipedia. Again, welcome! --[[User:Gimme danger|Gimme danger]] ([[User talk:Gimme danger|talk]]) 18:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Your violation on the rule of [[Liancourt Rocks]] == |
|||
Judging by your sporadic and scarce edits, and I assume good faith in your edit on [[Liancourt Rocks]] which violated our rules supervised by ARBCOM committee, I let you know the rules for the article. You should read the rule written on the talk page, because you could've been blocked for your violation of the naming lameness if somebody spot it and reported it to the admins in charge. Altering the current name of the title and Sea of Japan/East Sea are all strictly forbidden without any discussion. So use the talk page first with plausible rationale and sources when you really feel like the naming is not right. Take care.--[[User:Appletrees|Appletrees]] ([[User talk:Appletrees|talk]]) 14:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:45, 15 May 2008
|
I also noticed that you have been editing articles on Tibet-related topics. You may be interested in joining WikiProject Tibet, a group of editors working to improve coverage of Tibet and Tibetan Buddhism on Wikipedia. Again, welcome! --Gimme danger (talk) 18:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Your violation on the rule of Liancourt Rocks
Judging by your sporadic and scarce edits, and I assume good faith in your edit on Liancourt Rocks which violated our rules supervised by ARBCOM committee, I let you know the rules for the article. You should read the rule written on the talk page, because you could've been blocked for your violation of the naming lameness if somebody spot it and reported it to the admins in charge. Altering the current name of the title and Sea of Japan/East Sea are all strictly forbidden without any discussion. So use the talk page first with plausible rationale and sources when you really feel like the naming is not right. Take care.--Appletrees (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)