User talk:Gogo Dodo

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here. When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind: Use a descriptive subject/headline. If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to. Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless... If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section. Click here to leave me a message

I am a teacher in California

I am trying to help them understand that Wikipedia is not a valid source for information. Most students don't quite get this, since pretty much everybody can update this Wiki. There are few scholars that update information or include sources. I was hoping to be able to show them that they can't actually trust all of their source for research on the internet.

Can you please let one thing go?

Thanks, Chris —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cp1955 (talk • contribs) 05:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I just noticed this on my watchlist and could not help but add a little message here: [1]. Hope that's okay. (And wow . . .) =) -WarthogDemon 05:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Barnstars

I finally aquired one, could you help me set up a barnstar log like yours?— Dædαlus^{→quick link} / Improve 08:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks; I would like both objects please. Thankyou for your help. I actually tried once before to copy the source, but it looked so jumbled I couldn't figure it out.(*is not that good at code*)— Dædαlus^{→quick link} / Improve 20:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. Also, on a different topic, I refresh my watchlist to see your page was attacked several times, do you have any idea where this came from? ... _{Do you think it's our little troll?}— Dædαlus^{→quick link} / Improve 21:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

sorry for changing your user page

I hate to change user pages, but looks like yours was vandalized. Psu256 (talk) 17:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

inapprpriate?

Please explain to me why you have decided that the article kikiyaon is "inapprpriate".

Fwooper (talk) 21:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Why are you attempting to delete more of my pages?

What is your problem? if those pages were so inapprpriate then why didn't you delete them before now? and please actually give me an answer to the question "What do you think is wrong with nearly all of my articles?"

reference: I DON'T HAVE ONE!

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

What about refferences?

You said that I shouldn't use copyrighted material; that makes since but how do I know that if I don't you won't just start deleting my pages for lack of refferences?

Fwooper (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Magic Johnson

Thanks for doing the extra revert, looks like I managed to revert the wrong one!

I have placed a warning on the users page.

Lukeyboyuk (talk) 00:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

elan school

What is your connection with elan school? I speak the truth and you want to delete it? That poor girl would not have ran off and got murder, hadn't not been for the saily abuse she endured at elan school. I think all parents should know of this horrible tragedy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IH8ELAN (talk • contribs) 07:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for keeping watch over Shannara. Cheers! the_ed17 02:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

And one from me

(Seemed appropriate to place this under the pre-existing heading "Thanks". Is that wrong? If so, erk, sorry)

Cheers for clearing that up for me. I thought it was that, but when I tried it it didn't work at first. Turned out I'd put the damn things in backwards XD. --Lichtonatus (talk) 11:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Reverting of IGE article

You reverted changed made to the following article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IGE

The majority of this article is a copy&paste that was originally posted on mmobux.com at http://www.mmobux.com/articles/760/the-rise-and-fall-of-ige

Since Wikipedia states: "Do not copy text from other websites without a GFDL-compatible license. It will be deleted."

I felt it would be right to delete this. Can you please look into this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.8.84.64 (talk • contribs)

I checked and you're right. I didn't notice your Talk comment. Sorry about reverting you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:46, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

A little help!

Please give me your 5 minutes (or less):

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Religion#Please_stop_changing_the_existing_summary_table.

Thank you so much. Good luck!

Angelo De La Paz (talk) 15:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Disregard this, this user is trolling. He has put this on the userpage of at least 8 users and reverted my replies. Herunar (talk) 16:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Hmm..no, we shouldn't be asking more users for participation. He has spammed 9 users with more or less the same message. And this is no content dispute, he's either trolling or simply dumb. I responded to all of his concerns and fixed everything he wanted, and all he did was delete my messages and went on to ask 9 users for help, as well as giving me three vandalism warnings. Yes, it's pretty damn frustrating. Herunar (talk) 16:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Amber Rives

Hey I found another reference for Amber Rives [2] I'll send you more as I find them & will you let me know when you are willing to let me create her article?Asia'h E (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Formatting?

Do you intend to just revert the incorrectly formatted addition that I removed or are you going to leave it incomplete? I removed the info because of formatting issues, you added it back with the same bad formatting. KellyAna (talk) 21:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I only meant to reinsert the next episode title, I didn't notice the formatting issue until I looked again and changed browsers. You reverted three edits: [3] [4] [5]. I just reinserted the first one, but I see what you meant and I corrected it here. I actually thought you were referring to the second and third edits in your edit summary, but accidentally reverted the first edit, too. Eh, it's all fixed now. I think the two castaways to Exile has confused people. It used to be easy enough to just copy and paste the next episode, but now you have be careful this season. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

The Papsmears

I realize the article for this band was very poorly written, but I do wish to re-write it, they are a fairly significant up and coming group, and i have several sources i can cite to prove this, including interviews with them in several reputable publications, if you will grant me permission to restart this article.

Letoh Ydoc (talk) 03:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Usher/Rives

Hey I just created an account and so can't edit Usher's wikipedia page could you add the info for me about his younger brother James Raymond(JLack)who produced tracks on his "Confessions" album and will produce tracks on his upcoming "Here I Stand" album here is the reference [6] Also are you blocking the article about the songwriter,something Rives???She's writing songs for his new album too.Or is there an article about her already?I'm not sure of her first name.ThanksUsher4Life (talk) 11:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:42, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Talk Page Protection

Can you protect User talk:WarthogDemon/Archive/Archive 18? An editor continually uses her account or IPs to remove discussions from it. -WarthogDemon 17:04, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Done. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. =) -WarthogDemon 01:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop deleting my Harbour Square entry

I have entered the start of an entry to Harbour Square, and you evidently deleted it. I would appreciate some time to finish it, about 1 week. I have a full time job and family responsibilities. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cicorp (talk • contribs) 03:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Pleasure -

- is all mine! :-) Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 21:07, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia List of Notable Egyptologists

The ongoing editing of (and occasional tampering with) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Egyptologists has omitted or removed a number of notable Egyptologists who were originally listed and now contains the names of a number of individuals who are virtually unknown in the field. It might serve the readers of Wikipedia better to simply provide a link to a site such as the international directory of Egyptologists: http://www.iae.lmu.de/iae/ide/ide.htm

Professor Richard Wilkinson Editor, Directory of North American Egyptologists. http://www-oi.uchicago.edu/OI/DEPT/RA/ABZU/EGDIR_INTRO.HTML —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.60.76 (talk) 23:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Since I know very little about the field, I will defer to you about if the link should be added. You are welcome to add it in to an external links section. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. It's difficult in that the list itself has problems and needs to be adjusted but a complete list would be just way too long. I'd be happy to help sort it out if you wish. Please feel free to email me at egypt@u.arizona.edu if you would like to work on it together. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.60.76 (talk) 00:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Maybe the best way to take care of the problem (if you would want to use your wiki editing experience as I have none!) would be to simply put a statement under the current header paragraph that a complete list of Egyptologists can be found at http://www.iae.lmu.de/iae/ide/ide.htm then change the heading "Notable Egyptologists" to "Egyptologists in Wikipedia" and have the list with a short statement such as "The following individuals, or others, have added biographical summaries to Wikipedia: This would solve the problem of the glaring omissions as well as the questionable additions. RW —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.60.76 (talk) 01:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I've made some changes to the article that might help clarify that the list is incomplete. Your wording suggestions are not quite the usual style, but I think I have added in wording that follows the spirit of what you are trying to say. A lot of the lists of people on Wikipedia are often incomplete because the general style of Wikipedia is to include only individuals with articles on Wikipedia. It cuts back on people adding vanity entries or not-yet-notable people. So I am sure that some notable Egyptologists are missing as nobody has yet to write an article about them.

Upon further reading, a link to the IAE was already at the bottom of the article, but I changed it to link directly to the IDE. As for editing Wikipedia, it's quite easy as you have already figured out how to leave comments. Editing an article is not that much different. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. It certainly helps to stress that the list is incomplete. The only problem that remains is that of the individuals listed as "notable Egyptologists" who are not Egyptologists - such as the RUGBY player, Michael Rhodes. I guess that comes down to whether Wikipedia style articles are accurate or not. If you don't want to clean up the list together I can certainly try redoing it. RW —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.60.76 (talk) 15:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Ouch. That's bad. He's been in there since October 2007. He's gone now. I guess nobody noticed when he was added (it happens on lower profile articles like this one).

I checked everybody on the list on make sure their article stated that they were all Egyptologists, fixed a few links, sorted the list and so on. One thing that happened with the list clean up is that Abdul Latif al-Baghdadi ended up with a dead link (if you'll excuse the bad pun). I don't know the notability status of this individual. As I mentioned earlier, dead links (also known as "redlinks") are generally frowned upon in these types of lists as they are not helpful to the reader and tend to invite vanity entries. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Great- dropping the Rugby player is certainly a good start. So what would you like to do about the remaining ones who are not "Notable Egyptologists" - including the vanity entries and entries for people who are unheard of in the field (which together with all the notable omissions makes the list virtually useless as titled? Wouldn't it be simplest to solve that problem with at least a somewhat more accurate heading such as "Egyptologists with Entries in Wikipedia"? "Notable Egyptologists" is explicit that the individuals are notable (many of whom are not) and implicit that the list is complete (which it is not). Richard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.60.76 (talk) 18:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Was there somebody in particular that should not be listed? All of the remaining entries have links to articles that state they are Egyptologists except for the one I mentioned above. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Not listed as "Notable Egyptologists"? - yes, several, as I said. Either the title should be changed or the list redone. Changing the title would be far easier. R. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.60.76 (talk) 18:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I think we were crosstalking there. I thought you were saying that somebody currently in the list should not be in the list because they are not notable. I think what you're really saying that some Egyptologists who are notable are not in the list. Which is probably true, which is why I modified the lead the other day. I would not recommend altering the header to what you suggested because that is not the normal method of showing that the list is incomplete. As for adding to the list, that's fine if the Egyptologist has an article on Wikipedia or an outside source can be cited that they are indeed notable enough for inclusion, but just haven't been written about. If we just start adding in lists of names without providing a reason and citations for their inclusion, it is likely that it will be deleted. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I understand what you are saying here but it's actually not the omissions that are the main problem - there are really far too many qualified Egyptologists to list on the page - as may be seen in the directories such as the DNAE or the IAE Directory - The real problem is the accuracy of heading a list "Notable Egyptologists" when many obviously are not. RW —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.60.76 (talk) 19:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see. There is a set of procedures for articles to be deleted for lack of notability. See Wikipedia:Deletion policy or more specifically Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Since my knowledge about the notability (or lack there of) of the current people listed is not that great, I would not be comfortable proposing their deletion or deleting their entry from the list. You could create an account and propose deletion yourself, but since you are involved in the field of study, it might be seen as a conflict of interest. If you do decide to create an account, you might be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Egypt. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I followed your earlier advice and made a reasonable change. I simply changed "Notable Egyptologists" which, as I have tried to explain, was ridiculous given the list - to "Egyptologists". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.60.76 (talk) 20:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC) The changes you made at the beginning of the article seem good to me and I think that the article should be fine as structured now. Thanks for working together to get it cleaned up. RW —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.244.60.76 (talk) 20:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. Glad to be of assistance. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Redirects

why you delete my redirects?Z3Z1AAA (talk) 18:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

i dont you arent runescape player are you? we are redirecting locations there like City of Ardougne and Falador--Z3Z1AAA (talk) 18:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

omg now u delete that!!!Z3Z1AAA (talk) 18:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC) REMADE !--Z3Z1AAA (talk) 19:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

who r u?

who r u? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pony53 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Justin DeBower

I'm not sure if you have the power to delete the DeBower page, but you should know that my edit was as truthful as the original article. It was made as a joke, and should be deleted. RickyVando (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you.

Thanks for the revert on my userpage. I truly appreciate it. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 14:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Stop undoing Danny Kass

My name is Jason Berk. I am the executive producer of Danny's television show Danny and The Dingo. I am with Danny right now and we are reviewing his page for accuracy. He was born in Pompton Plains - the CT mistake was made by his former management company —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thundata (talk • contribs) 08:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:04, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

You are repeatedly placing a lie and falsehood on Danny Kass's page. He was not born in Connecticut. He was born in New Jersey. I have been with Danny all weekend trying to correct this issue, which you with no knowledge keep perpetuating. Please advise how to make this change stick. Thundata (talk) 19:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your edit of the Data Recovery page...

You removed the list of issues that must be handled during a data recovery imaging because of "Rm, already covered later in the article". Could you please let me know where exactly it is covered in the article? I don't seem to see anything at all about these issues?

Thanks, Mike--Mike Stang (talk) 11:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

question

Well this was our discussion so far. We are the owners of this website http://www.karakachan.eu.org and we would like to add content to Bulgarian Shepherd Dog but so far you deleted it. what did we do wrong and how to continue? How do we prove that we are the writers/owners of the content? The so-called copyrighted material is owned by us (Semperviva). All the content we wish to add including the pictures is our own material.

And the other question. >If you wish to copy content from your website into Wikipedia You mean that on this/our website we should referre to wikipedia?

Regards,

John (Semperviva)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:39, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

List of commercial failures

This list was informative and notable. It complied to WP policies. Your speedy delete is regrettable as Im sure that had you taken it to AfD, it would have been kept. Im not a fan of speedy deletes as this one has proved. Do you have notes on why you think it was speedy deletable? From my memory, the list was encyclopeadic. Thanks. 203.57.241.67 (talk) 04:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Encise

I deleted List of commercial failures last year because it was a redirect to a nonexistent article as noted in the deletion log. Upon checking the deleted revisions, it was a redirect to List of miscellaneous commercial failures which was deleted by consensus of an AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of miscellaneous commercial failures. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

How was it a "debate?"

"A corporate owned and sponsored attack on Barack Obama" seems much more truthful. If Disney News labeled it, "The Greatest Thing to Happen Since Sliced Bread" would we be expected to call it that? I thought encyclopedias -- and Wikipedia -- were about the truth, not the network spin. Either way, I won't change it again, but I am disappointed in you as an Admin. for reverting the article to Disney News' spin and marketing rather than what the event honestly was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.220.59.16 (talk) 07:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Your message to me clearly indicates that you have a bias and your edits of "President Obama" and "the future President" is not a neutral point of view. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The President thing was a stupid move on my part and I apologize. It was only after someone changed the truthful description of, "a corporate owned and sponsored attack on Barack Obama" back to ABC's PR term, "debate" and it was meant to show how absurd using words like "debate" or "President" are if they are not true. ABC/Disney News' forum was not a debate and I still say that term should be changed back, but I will leave it up to your discretion as an admin. Is Wikipedia being sponsored by Walt Disney? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.220.59.16 (talk) 08:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

You were the one who added corporate owned and sponsored attack which is not a neutral point of view. You made the President Obama change before it was reverted back, so your claims are not quite valid. As for your question, Wikipedia is not sponsored by anybody. See who owns Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Are you saying the "debate" wasn't corporate owned and sponsored? At the very least, you would have to admit that is fact and not up for ... well ... debate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.116.0.131 (talk) 07:37, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I have no opinion one way or the other except that any entry regarding the issue must be from a neutral point of view and backed up with citations from reliable sources. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

why did you delete my page?

Says it all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Milesy101 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

He is a well known physicist, you didnt give me time to finish — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milesy101 (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

otto eugene adams

as far as I know I am one of about three people who have good and meaningful information about this Baltimore architect, I am an architect myself and this kind of information is very difficult to preserve and document, because we make structures that are experienced directly and not always written about this information is being drawn from index card files, microfilm, and small sources could I please have the text of my article about so I can try and finish doing some of it if you don't think it's notable work architecturally or historically, ask a historian or a historical architect who also does wiki administration it is notable for the Baltimore region —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teda13 (talk • contribs) 04:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I can't understand it - it happened within a couple hours while I was working - what's the point in having the advantage of collaboration if someone swoops in and trashes a work in progress I have a 4 year old so I have to work when I can —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teda13 (talk • contribs) 05:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

RE:Thanks

No problem, I swear you get the most interesting comments =D « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) 23:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Haha yeah I saw that lol. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) 04:06, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem, I didn't look into it much, I just gave the guy a real response, hoping that would maybe help. Did he stop? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 04:19, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

please dont delete

please dont delete the article i made on resident evil 6. i know its not true but what if it gives capcom an idea about what to put in the next game? this article was pretty good to make and it makes the resident evil articles look good. plus its just so well done. plus im sure people will figure its not true so just dont delete it. PLEASE

forgot

sorry i forgot to leave my signature. please dont delete Seanmbiscool (talk) 05:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:28, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

no way

you have no right to delete my articles. DO YOU KNOW HOW LONG IT TOOK ME TO MAKE THOSE??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanmbiscool (talk • contribs)

why

will you just let it stay for a little while at least? i made it today and you already tryin to delete it. some people might like the articles. SO JUST LEAVE IT!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanmbiscool (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

RE6 Hoax

Just thought I might let you know, he recreated the article again. Also, in response to the user who recreated the article, no one owns an article here.— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 06:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Admin Coaching

Would you be able to coach me? Since I'm approaching 1000 edits, I'm considering an RfA.— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 07:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

If I could give a quick suggestion, you may want to take a look at User:Gonzo fan2007/Admin to help better understand all the technical abilities given to an admin and the pages that an admin uses.

Daedalus969, honestly I would recommend waiting until you get some more experience under your belt to go through WP:RFA. RFA is very demanding and many users have very high standards. Many users will not even consider a user who doesnt have more than 3000 edits and 3 months experience, with some users having even higher standards such as certain article writing experience (FAs, GAs, FLs, etc.) and experience in admin related areas. To give you an example, when i went for my my RFA, I had 5500 edits and 9 months of solid editing, and Gogo Dodo had over 10,000 edits and 8 months of solid editing when he went for his RFA. (I would also recommend reading through our RFA's for useful info).

All that said, I think you are definitely on the right track. Some suggestions would be to find an article and try and bring it up to GA/FA status, participate in XFD's discussions, give your opinion in discussions around Wikipedia and do what you are doing, just do it for a little longer so you get more experience (i.e. run into more experiences). And on a side note, Gogo Dodo is a great example of what to do here, whether he trains you or not you can learn a lot from just watching how certain admins act and what they do on the 'pedia. Good luck and keep up the good work.
Gogo Dodo, sorry for the long ramble on your talk page :-) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) 07:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I actually have been participating in a few of the discussion areas like AfD, AN/I, etc. I was just trying to meet some of the criteria posted on some page regarding RfAs. I can't remember what page it is. Regarding time spent here, I've actually been here for awhile, I'd have to check my edit history to see when I really began.— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 07:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I think the biggie for some people is going to be the edit count and the lack of mainspace edits. But like I said, if you give User:Gonzo fan2007/Admin a good look over and click some of the links that should help a lot. Also, consider reading Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list, which will help a lot. Also, feel free to ask any questions to me or basically any admin, I know I would be glad to answer any. Also, it does help a lot to have a WP:GA, WP:FA, or WP:FL under your belt. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) 07:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:30, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Haha, don't let your ego get too big now! In all seriousness though, its well-deserved. You are pretty dang good at what you do =D « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) 05:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, I didn't really think I could do FAs and that stuff, at least not yet. Everything else you mentioned(XfDs, RC patrolling, WP:ANI, CSD tagging, etc.), I actively participate in. I patrol the RC with a script that allows me to rollback(I have the rights to do so too) the vandalish edit, and warn the user whether against vandalism or a test(*loves the Lupin script despite how buggy it is*). I think I have joined a few conversations in ANI, but I can't remember, I do know I have participated a bit in AN/I. Last but not least, I add tags where necesarry, especially for CSD, and AfD where applicall(spelling?).

Also, Gonzo, since you seem to have this page on watch, are you offering for coaching?— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 06:07, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Invisible Barnstar
		You stay under the radar, yet are one of wikipedia's most prolific vandal fighters! Yours truly, ♥Shapiros10WuzHere♥ 13:54, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

First Edit Day

♥Shapiros10WuzHere♥ has given you a WikiCake in honor of his first edit day! WikiCakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

I want to give a slice of cake to all of the editors who have helped/befriended me.

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

ScottAHudson Page Debate

Would this debate that began on the 14th of April have ended by now? ScottAHudson (talk) 14:47, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Does this mean that my pages have received a keep? ScottAHudson (talk) 17:58, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for the welcome. -- Sleepaholic (talk) 16:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Post about the Anaheim Angels.

Hey sorry about the editing on the Angels page a couple of days back, my friends are idiots and take their baseball rivalries too seriously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.148.50 (talk) 21:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppets & Whatnot

I'm not sure what to do on this one, but there's confirmed sockpuppetry over at Dorje Shugden. User:Thatcher's Checkuser confirmed that there are several socks in play there, as seen here [7]. I'm not really familiar with the subject, but the SPAs seem to be overwhelming the article, having conversations on the talk page, etc. I'm not sure where to go with it from here, but I thought I should mention it to somebody. Thanks! Redrocket (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

changes to creature

I noticed you made some edits to the "creature" page, eliminating a legitimate note in the "other" listing. I am going to go ahead and change it back, but was wondering why you made the edits to remove the skateboard company and the advertising agency. Let me know your thoughts when you have a moment. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robsong36 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

hey - got your response, and i will try to find time to make an article on this topic, but for now, i am going to go ahead and reject your edit since it is incorrect (albeit well intentioned). for your edification, creature is an advertising agency that works with many fortune 500 companies, has been covered in the New York Times on a few occasions this year alone, and has received extensive media coverage in the marketing industry. i know you aren't in the ad industry based on your profile, so when i get some time i will add the article as you have requested. until then, please go ahead and leave these edits on the page. thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.178.28.242 (talk) 23:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:51, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Time Zones

I've just tried to convert US Eastern Time into New Zealand time, and (I think) I've come up with the fact that Survivor started 40 minutes ago (I almost reverted "vandalism" but thought it might be airing now, thus making it *probably* true). Have I guesstimated accurately? Thanks, -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 00:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Cool, just as I thought. Thanks! -- THE DARK LORD TROMBONATOR 02:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Stationery Page

Hi! I added the link under "external links" category. There should be no conflict as "external links" denote all 3rd party links to related sources.

The link has not been added needlessly anywhere else, this article relates to the link. Regards, Mir Moiz 07:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

While I understand your concern, I do not see how a simple article about stationery with no reference to stationery providing business and ventures can complete the picture. There is a thin line between understanding if something is meant to be for only advertising purposes or for simple information dissemination.

The article as it is does not have any practical references to stationery businesses. I think it is missing that aspect. I recommend that if not just this one particular link I mentioned, then we should add some more links perhaps, staples, officedepot etc... Adding value to the article. Awaiting... Mir Moiz 08:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

10000!

Take a look! Now I only have like 35000 more to catch up to you :D « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) 21:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Haha, yeah SQL made a ridiculously fast counter. Although the admin action count is usually a couple hours behind, the edit count is always up to date. And I actually am going to take it easy, Im tired ;-) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 04:22, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism

Hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism put on my user page. --Bobianite (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

One question

Thanks for blocking 69.113.79.227. He was swearing on my page.the question is:How long have you blocked him? RogueMad2 (talk) 05:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Perfect

Great! RogueMad2 (talk) 05:37, 27 April 2008 (UTC) P.s:sign my guestbook. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RogueMad2 (talk • contribs) 05:39, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Block this dude again

69.113.79.227 has been vandalizing my page like: Do # in front of your signature-Do fword # in front of your signature, Your Dreaming eh?-Your Fwording eh? and userboxes-userfwordboxes. I suggest 50 hours? not an indefinite one though, that would happen if he was a really big problem. thanks. The Injection Of Hell (talk) 09:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Help

Hey Gogo, it's Dae. I am requesting help on the article Repo Man (1984 film) because another editor keeps adding this huge glaring list of trivia, which I'm sure violates WP:NOT. For a little history, the list was created by various anon IPs who were just passing through the article. Also, if you look at the article itself w/o the section, it looks great. The addition of the list just makes it look messy. I've suggested several times the editor Cowicide insert the text in the article body text, such as the plot, but it seems my suggestions go ignored. I would RfC, but last time I tried that I didn't even get a response until weeks after. Help would be much appreciated if you can find time in your schedual. Thankyou for your time if you agree to the request... or.. did I word that right?— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 16:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on our talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Would you be able to look over the user's talk page, the article's talk page, and the article, and tell me what I should do/if I did the right thing?— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 16:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Gogo, I want to set straight an untruth Daedalus has spoken of me when he says above, "I've suggested several times the editor Cowicide insert the text in the article body text, such as the plot, but it seems my suggestions go ignored." As you can see here I said, "I'll help move stuff or whatever is needed when I get some time soon. Regards..."

Also, Daedalus' accounting of the history of the article is absolutely untrue where he also says above, "For a little history, the list was created by various anon IPs who were just passing through the article."

In reality, there are close to 20 actual registered users who contributed to that "trivia" section in one way or another over the course of years. As seen in the history they are (to name most, not all) - (Unidyne, NapoliRoma‎, Oydman, Robert‎, TheQuandry‎, BlackAndy, Karlos the Jackal‎, ChuckyDarko, Osbojos, ChargersFan, PondScumEsq‎, Variable‎, MeltBanana, Acedian, Draconiszeta, Hoary‎, Grendelkhan, BerserkerBen‎, Trelvis‎, Davejenk1ns & Cowicide) This list is on top of the numerous "anon IPs" that Daedalus refers to.

As I'm sure you'll agree, I do NOT want to start any form of conversatoin with Daedalus here about this. I just want to set straight some untruths said about me and the situation in his statements above. I think the links and info I provided speak for themselves, and would like to finally just move on to bettering the Repo Man article. Cowicide (talk) 12:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Incivility

What do I do about a user who continues to be incivil? User in question:Cowicide— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 20:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Gogo, could you please reinforce to Daedalus what you said on his talk page above, specifically where you recommend to "stay away from each other until the issue is settled. Continued discussion on talk pages is not being productive". Daedalus is ignoring your advice and continues to post on my Talk Page. I've asked him repeatedly to only discuss the article with me and nothing more, but he continues to ignore my pleas and now he's ingnoring your advice as well. He is also continuing to address me with distracting personal issues on the actual talk page of the article as well here, here & here instead of focusing on the article issues. It would appear he's trying to bait me, when I'd rather just ignore him and work on the article. He's becoming very tiresome and a distraction from working on the article. Cowicide (talk) 12:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

That's because you continue to insult me despite that the reasons you do are wrong.— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 15:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

And it appears a lot more that you were the one trying to bait me by calling me a dick over and over and over again.— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 15:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I honestly just want you to see that I was true to my word, you just misinterpreted/didn't bother to read the times on the history.— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 16:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Daria Nazarova

Thank you for deleting the Daria Nazarova article immediately, i spent an hour making it as a romantic suprise for my girlfriend. But you deleted it within seconds of me making it. I suppose thats you doing a positive thing for the world is it. Just saying thanks for that anyway. PaulyMcConnell (talk) 22:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Candlesticks always make a nice gift. Redrocket (talk) 22:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Vandals.

They're losing their edge, no? ;) · AndonicO ^Engage. 01:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Squantorox22

Alright, thanks for letting me know. Oore (talk) 05:53, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Mammoth - the new band

You have now deleted the page I tried to write about the up and coming band Mammoth twice for aparantly not being "notable". I have included the appropriate notability of the band according to wikipedia's own instructions. What can I do to ensure that this does not happen again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Addiddasfan101 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

clever

hmmm your clever lol ill try and make it more legit and notable for you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Addiddasfan101 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

God

The article is vandalism. Or false. It has no references, so therefore Im challenging it, though I dont know how. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LOLNIXON (talk • contribs) 03:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Grand Theft Auto IV Delay

The template applies to articles created with obvious misinformation. Doesn't that apply to that article? If not, why not? Oore (talk) 03:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I've checked various news sources and I am certain that this is just misinformation. If this was true, sources would be very easily found. There is no reason to assume good faith when there is absolutely no news source that can confirm what this editor has claimed. Oore (talk) 03:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:59, 29 April 2008(UTC)

I'm fine with that compromise. Oore (talk) 04:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

ShepBot

Hello, Gogo Dodo. You have new messages at Stepshep's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

§hep • ¡Talk to me! 21:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

warning at User talk:Quickskins1992‎

Hi, I noticed that we both recently put warnings on this page, but I'm wondering if there was some confusion. You issued a seperate warning shortly after I did, apparently for an NPA at Bill Whicher. However, the only edits from that account were the vandalism to Censorship and another set of vandalisms to Mark Foley. So, while it seems a second warning was clearly warranted, I'm not sure it was the right warning. Did I overlook something perhaps, or should the NPA warning be changed to a level 2 vandalism warning? I'll be watching your page, so feel free to reply here, and thanks for your time. Doc Tropics 23:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

You didn't overlook anything or issue the wrong warning. My warning was for an attack page by the editor that I deleted. I usually issue the {{attack}} warning when I delete an attack page instead of the uw-vandalism* warnings. If they keep it up, I switch over to uw-create3 or uw-create4 warnings. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, that explains everything! You have beaten me to the punch on vandalism reverts a couple times, so I will try to be faster  : ) Doc Tropics 06:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Lol

Don't you just love it when they do this? I mean, do they seriously think they can fool us? :) -WarthogDemon 03:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[8] Ah you beat me by two seconds :) Oh and regarding the email, thank you for the advice, Im just going to let it rest. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 03:25, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

You two didn't have the TRULY interesting ones. Why just last week someone was trying to warn me not to revert libelous information that Herbert Hoover did Will Smith impressions! :P -WarthogDemon 03:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

He doesn't? I didn't know that. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Jacob Zerah

I would just like to note that Jacob Zerah is in fact a real person and that I am not done adding his signifigance and contributions to the world. I just made that quick page but now I have to retype the whole thing because you deleted it.

Jacobzerah (talk) 03:25, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Jacob Zerah

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Darren mccullagh

Dear Gogo Dodo,

i am writing to you on matter of the deletion of the "Darren McCullagh" article. I feel that this Wikipedia page was deleted unfairly and i was not given an oppertunitiy to plead my case. In my local town of Strabane the character of Darren Mccuallagh has historic significance. I feel that the speedy deletion of my article was unjust, although my Wikpedia contributions, which was also my first contribution, was not as detailed as one might hope, i feel that it was inconsiderate of one to delete my work without a proper consultation. However i understand that you are a very busy person who is often called upon to spend their free time dealing with inconsiderate people intent on misusing Wikpedia and its benfits, at the same time i assure you that i am ont one of those people and i have no intention except to inform the world of our local "rebel" if you give me the oppertuninty to edit the Darren McCullagh page i will make it my priority to correct my mistakes and make the Darren Mc Cuallagh page one which will benifit the Wikipedia Community. Even if you feel that there is no oppertunity to make my contribuiton fit for you website i ask that you allow me the oppertunity to recover my contribution.

yours sincerly Danielle Quigley —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniellequigley (talk • contribs) 03:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Mcdiarmidc93

Hi this is mcdiarmidc, thankyou for message. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcdiarmidc93 (talk • contribs) 06:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Olivamine Article

Hi, I created an Olivamine article earlier today which was immediately deleted by Dekisugi. I tried using the "hangon" tag to contest it. I added a talk page and tried to justify my position for writing the article but you in turn delted my talk page based on the fact that the Olivamine page was deleted -- and the circle has closed.

I need to find out why my article was deleted and what i can do to contest the deletion. I tried following the directions but this has led me to nowhere. Please advise!

--08science (talk) 23:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on you talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/User Uncyclopedia

Hi, I want to delete User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/User Uncyclopedia. But if I put a db-author tag in that specific page, my other subpage which hosts all the userboxes is also being included in the category candidates for speedy deletion. Can you please delete the specific page User:Otolemur crassicaudatus/Userboxes/User Uncyclopedia. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 05:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Why did you delete my page?

Orr is angry with you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orrshnap (talk • contribs) 17:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Is that a threat?— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 18:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment left on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Fitz Phone

why did you delete the fitz phone page??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiiippiiiee (talk • contribs) 20:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Yo, text deleted...but why me?

I was writing an appropriate text about my favourite musician (wasn't done...still building on details of information) Y was my text deleted..is it because i am new? Thx for help Myredsocksrocks (talk) 06:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

RfC... sort of...

On the temp banning of user Redrocket. Please see his talk page for details.— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 20:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

why did you delete my page

i was trying to make a page about me. so why did you delete me? i had just started :(

also, jacob london sailor appleton is me, its a real person me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abc.jacob (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

help?

is it ok now? im not being biased. can you read it and tell what to change if so please?

Cheers, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abc.jacob (talk • contribs) 07:22, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

cause im famous in australia, i go to preimeres etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abc.jacob (talk • contribs) 07:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Brent's American Dream

I received your message. Brent Bradford is a student here at Northeatsern Univeristy and featured in the school news paper. I submitted what was previously written by themanbrent and quoted in the paper on the internet begging wiki page. This is not a form a self promotion because I am not Brent. His site has been getting attention from our student body and I am passing on the information. Can you explain why it can't stay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Transformerman (talk • contribs) 08:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, I see your point. Thanks for clearing that up for me. No hard feelings. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Transformerman (talk • contribs) 10:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion and Tutoring

You deleted my article on TIAH Legion. I don't have ill will towards you, but I just want you to know that when you dont leave a reason on the respective users talk page concerning your motives seems cold and uncaring. I know you are not cold or uncaring and that you are only interested in keeping Wikipedia neat and tidy. I respect you for this.
That being said I would appreciate it if you would give me a few "pointers," if you will, on what is accepted on Wikipedia. You dont have to but, you could blacklist me and spam me, but if you do have any critical knowledge that you have acquired from your time with Wikipedia I would appreciate it if you would share such knowledge with me.

Respectfully,
--Kyreo (talk) 12:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Uploading image

A request, can you please upload this image of an earthquake. I want to use it for the article 1999 Chamoli earthquake. I am asking you because I am still not well-versed in uploading images outside Flickr. The image is present in this page. The image will be fair use. A {{Non-free historic image}} will be appropriate for use in the particular article. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

kelly luczak

Why are you denying the importance of Kelly????

Kelly kelly kelly kelly kelly kelly kelly kelly —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kellylulu (talk • contribs) 23:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandal

This guy left me a message. I have reason to believe that he is the GM minivan vandal. User talk:216.15.125.84. Karrmann (talk) 01:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

In the matter of spelling corrections on Talk pages

Thank you for the kindness of your counsel. I gladly accept your sensible suggestion. Wortschätzer (talk) 13:23, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanx!

Thank you so much for the tips i really appreciated it.

From (Spiritscream (talk) 08:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)) Spirit

Porque

Why did you delete my tom? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raz Forshizle (talk • contribs) 20:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

As I am not an admin, there's nothing I can do about it, thus I simply reverted the message.

Doesn't give him an excuse for vandalism, nonetheless. I do not consider his posting on my talk page any form of 'attack', but I'm not involved. HalfShadow 20:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh, a sock? I thought the name looked a little strange. It's fine. I would have reverted the other message as well. I've replied on their page, but I suppose it's probably a moot point now. HalfShadow 21:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi!

I just learned how to do this:

ok, nemind... :D

cool work on the reverts :) (Terra Xin (talk) 07:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC))

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Precautions for the future

Do you know anything about bots and or bot-making? Or if you don't, do you know anyone who does? The reason I ask, I'm just preparing for future events I would like a bot that will revert all edits made to my userpage if they are made by anyone who isn't me. Feel free to copy this message to the other user you know, assuming you know one, of course assuming further that you don't know how to make bots. Thankyou for your time.— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 18:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind, found out a different method. I am now requesting full protection of my userpage.— Dædαlus^T@lk / Improve 00:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)