Jump to content

User talk:Angelo De La Paz: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Undid revision 222562156 by Netking China (talk)
Line 134: Line 134:
We'd better respect each other, although we have different political ideas.
We'd better respect each other, although we have different political ideas.
<small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Netking cn|Netking cn]] ([[User talk:Netking cn|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Netking cn|contribs]]) 10:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
<small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Netking cn|Netking cn]] ([[User talk:Netking cn|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Netking cn|contribs]]) 10:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

*The first version of this topic [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Angelo_De_La_Paz&oldid=222439880#Warning:Please_obey_One-China_Policy], sent by [[Special:Contributions/Netking cn|Netking cn]].
[[User:Angelo De La Paz|Angelo De La Paz]] ([[User talk:Angelo De La Paz#top|talk]]) 10:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:36, 30 June 2008

Welcome

Hello, Angelo De La Paz! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Wikipedia
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

About your recent reverts at Overseas Chinese

Your recent reverts at Overseas Chinese inadvertently reverted legitimate changes that addressed concerns described in the talk page. It is always a good idea to read the talk page carefully before declaring any edit vandalism. Thank you. 122.109.98.81 (talk) 10:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


June 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Matilda Mecini. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Toddst1 (talk) 08:09, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I've left a message on Toddst1's talk page to clarify this, as I belive Angelo's edits fall under the BLP exception in the 3RR policy. PageantUpdater talkcontribs 08:43, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do make mistakes. Sorry about that.Toddst1 (talk) 08:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User warnings

Done. :) I think they may be sockpuppets judging by the editing patterns and the similar usernames. If the first one breaks his warning, either let me know or report at WP:AIV. If the second one breaks his warning, leave a final warning, and then AIV. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I've granted you rollback as well, simply because you'd put it to good use reverting vandalism on the high-risk articless you edit. Plus if you're thinking of getting huggle, you need rollback to use it. Remember not to use it in edit wars, or to revert any good faith edits. They can put new users off the project (we were all new once :)). Best of luck, PeterSymonds (talk) 21:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate

Hi Angelo! There is a heavy discussion right now, in this article, Miss Pakistan World here and it was nominated for deletion here; your opinion will be highly appreciated, especially your vote. Your participation in this matter is noteworthy, in view of the fact that you are a member of the Wiki Project Beauty Pageants. It doesn’t matter if your vote is favorable or not, but what matters most is your involvement since it seems to me that some commenter are against pageantry. Personally, I think that the article should be kept but should be freed from tremendous advertisement lines.--Richie Campbell (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Miss World 2006

Your recent use off rollback on this article is a breach of the conditions in which you can use it. It is for vandalism only and not content disputes. If you would even read the article on the Ulster Banner you will see that it IS NOT the flag of Northern Ireland and it should not be used to represent it. BigDuncTalk 08:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

Since you do not understand that Northern Ireland has no flag and persist in using an unofficial and sectarian flag in articles to fill the void left in your pretty little displays, I have removed all the flags that were being used solely for decorative purposes which is a violation of WP:FLAG. Happy editing! BigDuncTalk 11:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Firewell, my friend

I'll no longer contribute to Wikipedia. A clique of Christian hypocrites is trying to destroy me; I'm too disappointed with Wikipedia system. Administrators don't act against these fraudulent hypocrites who make false claims against NPOV users and impose false informations into the articles. Adios! --Esimal (talk) 18:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Firewell, my friend

I'll no longer contribute to Wikipedia. A clique of Christian hypocrites is trying to destroy me; I'm too disappointed with Wikipedia system. Administrators don't act against these fraudulent hypocrites who make false claims against NPOV users and impose false informations into the articles. Adios! --Esimal (talk) 18:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New problems

Hi there! After a short-time absence, now youare come back with more problems. I am not appreciate your new map (Image:World religions.png) because its source wasn't good and it's come from a BLOG? Which violated Wikipedia's policies. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 12:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-Just updated the source, clearly shows distribution well reflected on both maps. Moshin (talk) 12:27, 23 June 2008 (UTC) -> http://www.britannica.com/eb/art/print?id=68151&articleTypeId=0[reply]

- OK go ahead. I'll fix the others later. Thanks. Moshin (talk) 12:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dont follow me

Please dont follow me on to articles and make changes just to try and bait me I have reverted your childish action. But if you must follow at least join the talk page discussion thanks. BigDuncTalk 15:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Earth TOC conflict

Hi Angelo! I brought back the article to its original state here before the “edit disagreement” pertaining to the Table Of Contents (TOC) of Miss Earth article, please use the discussion section of the article to convey your ideas so we can come up with a common decision to resolute the matter. Your active participation is needed to resolve the conflict. --Richie Campbell (talk) 13:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Soviet Union Muslim Population 1979.jpg

How about this map, it shows the population of Muslims in Kazakhstan, Christian or non-religious population seems to be at the north of Kazakhstan.

Oh I see you have made the changes, Thanks a lot. Moshin (talk) 15:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About the article "East Asia"

I turned it into a netrual one. I hope you will be satisfied with it. Don't use the term "vandalism" to frighten people. If an edit war happens, why do you say that I am guilty, not you? We'd better respect each other, although we have different political ideas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Netking cn (talkcontribs) 10:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo De La Paz (talk) 10:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]