Do you have a list of his indefinite semi-prots? It really should be brought to the [[WP:AN]], especially in light of his recent loss of priveledges. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 19:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Do you have a list of his indefinite semi-prots? It really should be brought to the [[WP:AN]], especially in light of his recent loss of priveledges. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 19:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
:What about a mass unprotection and let RFPP sort it out? That's why I think an AN to determine the best course of action would be ideal. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 19:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello. In December of 2006, an article I submitted about the autograph collecting site [1] was nominated for speedy deletion and then was deleted (by you :D). Since then, Fanmail.biz has reached 11949 members and an Alexa rank of 50,513. It has also been mentioned repeatedly in credible sources such as newspapers and other Internet sites. These seemed to be the main problems with my article.
I hate to be bitter, but it seems Wikipedia practices a double standard. As one example, there is an article on OneClick Wi-Fi, which has both a lower member count and Alexa ranking than Fanmail.biz It has not been nominated for speedy deletion (which I felt was far too drastic of an action for my article in the first place).
Is there a reason my article was nominated for speedy deletion and so many others were not? Would it be alright to resubmit my article? Thanks. Lutherjw (talk) 19:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods has undergone a new facelift and revamping just in time to putter away at new civic articles on the August civic holiday, the first Monday of August. Drop by and see the new colour scheme which corresponds the the provincial colours. The assessment department provides quality ratings to articles via the talk page. At the current moment the assessment department combines the communities project with the province on the Canada talk page bannerr. There is a request out to make an assessment table from the parent talk page banner or if a new banner is advised. The challenge has been met! User:CBM figured out the coding necessary! A number of various editors and administrators puttered at applying the code, and it works!! Thank you very much.
C class assessment is the newest addition for articles which need more TLC before being assessed as B class such as citations or wiki clean up. The article is more useful than a start class article, but isn't quite as rounded as a B class article.
A class articles will need more than one reviewer for reaching A class article criteria.
Chcek out the List of basic Canada topics which brings to the forefront a grouping of material about Canada for the WWW surfer. The variouse lists of basic topics has recently been undergoing an overhaul.
Canadian related articles for deletion have been listed here to encourage article development and conversations at the AFD talk page. There is now discussion to identify such articles via robot similar to Australia's notice board, to enable a better canvassing of deletion tags on articles. Should there also be discussion started for a robot notification of Saskatchewan articles for deletion? A new proposal by Wolterding encompassing Article alerts would identify tagged as well as promoted articles to give a rolling new view of articles moving forwards as well as articles in need of TLC.
Ghost towns
Please contribute to the converstation regarding ghost towns of Saskatchewan, as there is a robot deleting pages from the Category:Ghost towns
Barnstar Contest
Check out the Sk Hwys Contest and win awards! Some wonderful new maps have been added to Saskatchewan Highway articles for the latest addition. In return, work of equal kind was offered to the Alaska Portal and a barnstar offered to this contributor.
Trivia Question
The winner/s of the Wikiproject Saskatchewan Trivia contest will be announced in the next newsletter. To win this months trivia barnstar submit your answer before the end of August 2008. The answer to Trivia Question #4 will be published in the Volume 2, Issue 9 - September 2008 newsletter.
Trivia Question #3: , Where is Canada's longest pedestrian bridge and what is it named?
If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Saskatchewan. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!
Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the Newsletter. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
Mitchazenia (talk·contribs) This months spotlight award to goes to Mitchazenia. Even though he might not be heavily involved all things Saskatchewan, one area he is greatly involved in is roads and highways. Not only that he started the Saskatchewan Roads and Highways WikiProject. His other edits don't go un-notice. So much so that he was even awarded the WP: Sask Barnstar for his contributions to highway and road articles of Saskatchewan.
Please feel free to sign up as a Spotlight administrator and nominate more excellent and notable Saskatchewan editors on Wikipedia who deserve attention, and honour. For every wikipedia user who is mentioned in the spotlight department, they will receive a Wikipedia Saskatchewan Ribbon on their user pages for excellent service! Every newsletter will bring an update to the Spotlight Department, so please keep tuned for other excellent contributors.
The SKCN navigation template has been slightly re-designed. The colours have been changed. Let us know what you think.
The assesment template for SKCN is still in the works. Stayed tuned for more developments on this issue.
The Assesment Department has been undergoing some updates, additions, and changes. The new sections have of the Assesment Department have modeled after the WP: Saskatchewan Assesment Department. Many articles need assesments or re-assesments. Go to the Requesting an assesment of Assesment Department to see what needs an assesment.
As always, we are looking for new members. Don't hesistate to join WP: SKCN. We look forward to welcoming you to the project.
Please add new articles and as the newsletter acquires new information an update will be sent out to all subscribers signed up on WikiProject Saskatchewan Subscribers
Please look at the New articles section to keep updated on new articles related to Saskatchewan.
Do you have a list of his indefinite semi-prots? It really should be brought to the WP:AN, especially in light of his recent loss of priveledges. –xeno (talk) 19:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What about a mass unprotection and let RFPP sort it out? That's why I think an AN to determine the best course of action would be ideal. –xeno (talk) 19:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
