Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samwell (entertainer): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was no consensus
m Reverted edits by Bjweeks (talk) to last version by Jasynnash2
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''no consensus'''. [[User:Bjweeks|BJ]]<small><sup>[[User talk:Bjweeks|Talk]]</sup></small> 01:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
===[[Samwell (entertainer)]]===
===[[Samwell (entertainer)]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Samwell (entertainer)}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Samwell (entertainer)|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samwell (entertainer)]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samwell (entertainer)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 September 6#{{anchorencode:Samwell (entertainer)}}|View log]])</noinclude>
:{{la|Samwell (entertainer)}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Samwell (entertainer)|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samwell (entertainer)]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samwell (entertainer)|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 September 6#{{anchorencode:Samwell (entertainer)}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Line 39: Line 33:


*'''Keep''' per Phrasia. Also, while one of his videos is by far the most popular, it seems subjective to say that it is the only one he is known for. His other videos have a lot of views (sum is over 1 mil). —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/32.148.236.90|32.148.236.90]] ([[User talk:32.148.236.90|talk]]) 01:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)<!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|32.148.236.90}}
*'''Keep''' per Phrasia. Also, while one of his videos is by far the most popular, it seems subjective to say that it is the only one he is known for. His other videos have a lot of views (sum is over 1 mil). —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/32.148.236.90|32.148.236.90]] ([[User talk:32.148.236.90|talk]]) 01:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)<!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> {{spa|32.148.236.90}}

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 03:59, 10 September 2008

Samwell (entertainer)

Samwell (entertainer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable "internet celebrity". His video (What What (In the Butt)) has made a splash - 277,000 Ghits, 15 mill views on YouTube. However, notability is not catching. The creator gets 377 Ghits when you search for his real name. His website says he's signed to Southern Fried Records, but the record label's website doesn't list him under the "artists" tab. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 22:24, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  • Keep. He seems noteworthy enough to me -- he's one of the biggest Internet celebrities out there. Aside from the 15 million hits his "What What" video has received (and the fact that it's one of the most discussed YouTube videos of all time [check the "honors" section for the video]), his other videos get tons of views as well. Plus, he's been a featured guest on the Lily Allen and Friends television program and is appearing in two upcoming films.

As far as Southern Fried Records goes, it looks like his song is available from their website -- so if they're selling it and promoting it, it seems legit to me. Here's a link to their website: http://www.southernfriedrecords.com/site/index.php?page=111

And if you go to the Brownmark Films website (www.brownmarkfilms.com) it looks like he's received a ton of press from some very mainstream sources. 65.30.186.104 (talk) 07:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Why would you search for his real name? There's only around 1500 Ghits for ‘Adam Bahner‘, and yet Tay Zonday is considered notable. Search for the very generic name ‘Samwell‘ and you'll see that this particular Samwell dominates those results (7 out of the top 10). If this article is deleted I would bet it has more to do with Samwell's over-the-top flamboyance, rather than his lack of notability, and that's not cool. 69.210.102.55 (talk) 19:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: both the above seem to be WP:SPAs. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 19:42, 2 September 2008 (UTC) [reply]
  • Delete despite the claims above the subject does not appear to have significant coverage from multiple, reliable, 3rd party sources and therefore fails our policies and guidelines for inclusion. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 16:18, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please show us where he meets our notability guideline, which states that to be considered notable, the subject must have received significant coverage in reliable sources which are independent of the subject. seresin ( ¡? ) 22:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]