User talk:Skybon: Difference between revisions
Satori Son (talk | contribs) →Notice of editing restriction: new section |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Last incident== |
==Last incident== |
||
SkyBon, please revert your last edit in "Ethnic cleansing" article right now. Maybe that will reduce administrative sanctions you are inflicting upon itself. Thanks,[[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys|talk]]) 15:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC) |
SkyBon, please revert your last edit in "Ethnic cleansing" article right now. Maybe that will reduce administrative sanctions you are inflicting upon itself. Thanks,[[User:Biophys|Biophys]] ([[User talk:Biophys|talk]]) 15:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Notice of editing restriction == |
|||
[[Image:Yellow warning.png|left|20px]] '''Notice:''' Under the terms of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren]], any editor working on topics related to Eastern Europe, broadly defined, may be made subject to an editing restriction at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator. Should the editor make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he or she may be blocked for up to a week for each violation, and up to a month for each violation after the fifth. This restriction is effective on any editor following notice placed on his or her talk page. This notice is now given to you, and future violations of the provisions of this warning are subject to blocking. — <span style="font-family:Palatino Linotype">[[User:Satori Son|<b>Satori Son</b>]]</span> 15:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:50, 1 October 2008
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --KoberTalk 19:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Unless you explain the your NPOV tagging on the article's talk page, the tag's bound to be removed shortly. --Illythr (talk) 12:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- I will. At first HRW section should be edited and the section should be made neutral. "HRW described arsons, looting etc..." means that Russians or Ossetians were really looting, making arsons etc. This is UNACCEPTABLE. At first this is a lie. At second it is not confirmed neither by Russian nor by Ossetian and Abkhaz site. It is only confirmed by HRW which hates Russia and simply refuses to say that 1500+ were killed in the Tskhinvali and by CNN which looted Rusiya Al-Ayum TV channel footage from Tskhinvali and represented as footage from Gori. SkyBonTalk\Contributions 15:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
FAC withdrawn
- Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Russia/archive5, please note the instructions at the top of WP:FAC. You may consider re-nominating after the significant contributors to the article agree that it is ready for FAC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
Please see this. Although the warnings there states 24 hours, as you have a fairly recent block for 3RR violations, your next will be for 48 hours. Please refrain from any further reverts in this dispute. Also, do not use rollback in content disputes. Jennavecia (Talk) 18:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Last incident
SkyBon, please revert your last edit in "Ethnic cleansing" article right now. Maybe that will reduce administrative sanctions you are inflicting upon itself. Thanks,Biophys (talk) 15:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Notice of editing restriction
Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren, any editor working on topics related to Eastern Europe, broadly defined, may be made subject to an editing restriction at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator. Should the editor make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he or she may be blocked for up to a week for each violation, and up to a month for each violation after the fifth. This restriction is effective on any editor following notice placed on his or her talk page. This notice is now given to you, and future violations of the provisions of this warning are subject to blocking. — Satori Son 15:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)