User talk:WJBscribe

User:WJBscribe	User talk:WJBscribe	User:WJBscribe/Gallery	User:WJBscribe/Barnstars	User:WJBscribe/Drafts
Userpage (commons · meta)	Talk (Archives)	Gallery	Barnstars	Drafts

Hi! Please leave a message and I'll get back to you... Don't hesitate to get in touch if you have a question or need help. I'll do my best and can probably point you in the right direction if it isn't something I can sort out myself. Will

Acount name change

Wow! That was fast. Thank you very much! :) Rsazevedo ^msg 23:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

DigitalNinja

I see that on October 2 you blocked DigitalNinja (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) for abusive sockpuppets. Would you mind pointing me to who / what the puppets were? The editor is acting very strange and extremely disruptive at Barack Obama, Talk:Barack Obama, and the talk pages of the editors involved, making threats against established users, plotting to file checkuser requests[1] and what looks like a bad faith AN/I report. Could you help us figure out what is going on? Thanks, Wikidemon (talk) 03:33, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

The editor correctly points out (in his odd way) that the sockpuppet things was more than a year ago - I mistakenly thought it was last month. So that part of it is a stale matter. Sorry to cause any confusion. Wikidemon (talk) 03:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't have time to look into the current difficulties, but the previous matter is likely of little bearing. The accounts used were IP addresses. Despite the incident, I would be minded to believe that DigitalNinja is acting in good faith and would advise that he be dealt with in a respectful manner. WJBscribe (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. After a bit of hot-headedness he's quickly become contrite, helpful, etc. So...lesson being don't provoke seemingly upset editors? Thanks, Wikidemon (talk) 04:45, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, I have an important request to make. Is it possible to add this tool in revision history?. For example we have "External tools: Revision history statistics · Revision history search · Page view statistics" can they be checklinks now?. It is quite useful tools in checking dead links and repairing them. I use it quite often and iam sure many other's would want this tool too. Adding it in revision history would make task much easier. Thanks, That is for now. --SkyWalker (talk) 11:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

That tool does seem useful but I'm not sure what criteria has been applied in the past for adding such links to the revision history. I suggest you propose this at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) and see if there is a consensus for the addition. If so, it should be possible for an admin to add it to the appropriate page in the [[Mediawiki:]] namespace. WJBscribe (talk) 03:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Done has you commanded. --SkyWalker (talk) 06:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Well done

Nice work. --John (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes; and thanks for the detailed rationale. Let's hope nothing like that incident happens again soon. -- how do you turn this on 02:53, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

A Suggestion

This may not be the place for this suggestion, but you were helpful in the past. As a relative newcomer, but one who makes a number of footnoted contributions, I find it helpful when editors have a suggestion if they do more than simply tag the page, particularly if some work has gone into the submission. Some editors strive to leave a message on one's talk page, clarifying what's needed. But a small minority are preemptory. They either delete with no explanation, or simply post a template. More manners might encourage more contributors. This is an open community but that does not obviate the need for courtesy. Some editors preface their comments with: 'First, let me thank you for your contributions to wikipedia.' What a difference that single line makes! Sorry for the rant, but a couple of recent encounters have made me conscious of the need for editors to be mindful of submissions made for nothing by thousands of volunteers, and to treat them with respect. Regards,MarmadukePercy (talk) 03:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :)

Hi, I would just like to thank you again for nominating me for adminship. I was quite surprised by your offer and even more surprised by the support and trust the community has shown me. I hope I will not let you down and I promise to use the tools to the best of my ability. Thanks again and take care, ~ User:Ameliorate! ^{(with the !) (talk)} 14:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Are you active?

Would you please comment on the Bcrat noticeboard, regarding Caspian blue? Thanks, and best wishes, -- how do you turn this on 22:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Improper?

You think their continued personal attacks against me and unauthorized removal of my comments are all okay? I think you do. The activities are all malicious and why don't they just leave me alone? I just made a simple opinion on the opposition and willing to have a second thought. I will listen to User:Rlevs's opinion on this because I don't obviously think that you're neutral on this.--Caspian blue (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)