Jump to content

Edgar Speyer: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Anti-German pressure: editing [check "suggestion[s?]" in quote]
Undid revision 255590543 by Outriggr (talk) undid - none of these are great improvements
Line 152: Line 152:
[[Image:Solid, Punch, August 1911.png|thumb|''Solid'', an anti-German cartoon regarding Germany's opposition to the Anglo-French [[Entente cordiale|entente]], from ''[[Punch (magazine)|Punch]]'', 1911<br><small>GERMANY: "Donnerwetter! It's rock. I thought it was going to be paper."</small>]]
[[Image:Solid, Punch, August 1911.png|thumb|''Solid'', an anti-German cartoon regarding Germany's opposition to the Anglo-French [[Entente cordiale|entente]], from ''[[Punch (magazine)|Punch]]'', 1911<br><small>GERMANY: "Donnerwetter! It's rock. I thought it was going to be paper."</small>]]
===Anti-German pressure===
===Anti-German pressure===
The end of the 19th century and the first decade of the 20th century saw rising [[anti-German sentiment#Early 20th century|anti-German sentiment]] in Britain. As the [[Causes of World War I#arms race|naval arms race]] between Britain and Germany escalated, novels warned of the rising military threat from Germany, such as [[Robert Erskine Childers|Erskine Childers']] ''[[The Riddle of the Sands]]'' and [[invasion literature|invasion novels]] like [[William Le Queux]]'s ''[[The Invasion of 1910]]''.
The end of the 19th century and the first decade of the 20th century, saw rising [[anti-German sentiment#Early 20th century|anti-German sentiment]] in Britain. Against a background of the [[Causes of World War I#arms race|naval arms race]] between Britain and Germany, this was characterised by novels warning of the rising military threat from Germany such as [[Robert Erskine Childers|Erskine Childers']] ''[[The Riddle of the Sands]]'' and [[invasion literature|invasion novels]] such as [[William Le Queux]]'s ''[[The Invasion of 1910]]''.


Following the British declaration of war with Germany on 4 August 1914, Speyer resigned as a partner of the Frankfurt branch of the bank. After a Royal Proclamation on 11 September 1914<ref name="LG04">{{LondonGazette
Following the British declaration of war with Germany on 4 August 1914, Speyer resigned as a partner of the Frankfurt branch of the bank. Following a Royal Proclamation on 11 September 1914,<ref name="LG04">{{LondonGazette
|issue=28899
|issue=28899
|linkeddate=1914-09-11
|linkeddate=1914-09-11
Line 167: Line 167:
|url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/emailArticleViewer.arc?articleId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1914-10-14-13-002,ARCHIVE-The_Times-1914-10-14-13
|url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/emailArticleViewer.arc?articleId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1914-10-14-13-002,ARCHIVE-The_Times-1914-10-14-13
|accessdate = 2008-09-05
|accessdate = 2008-09-05
}} (registration required).</ref> Nonetheless, suspicions against Speyer's German parentage led to a hate campaign against him. Crowds gathered outside his home and jeered visitors. Accusations of his disloyalty and treachery appeared in the press, and he was accused of signalling to German submarines from his Norfolk house.<ref name="ODNB" />
}} (registration required).</ref> Nonetheless, suspicions against Speyer's German parentage led to a hate campaign against him. Crowds gathered outside his home and jeered visitors. Accusations of disloyalty and treachery were made against him in the Press and he was accused of signalling to German submarines from his Norfolk house.<ref name="ODNB" />


On 17 May 1915, Speyer wrote to Asquith, then Prime Minister, asking him to accept his resignation as a Privy Counsellor and to revoke his baronetcy, stating:
On 17 May 1915, Speyer wrote to Asquith, then Prime Minister, asking him to accept his resignation as a Privy Counsellor and to revoke his baronetcy stating:


:"Nothing is harder to bear than a sense of injustice that finds no vent in expression.
:"Nothing is harder to bear than a sense of injustice that finds no vent in expression.
Line 185: Line 185:
He resigned as chairman of the UERL and from the boards of the King Edward's Hospital Fund, the Poplar Hospital and the Whitechapel Art Gallery .<ref name="times2" />
He resigned as chairman of the UERL and from the boards of the King Edward's Hospital Fund, the Poplar Hospital and the Whitechapel Art Gallery .<ref name="times2" />


It is doubtful whether it was possible for Speyer to resign from the Privy Council or as a baronet, there being no formal mechanism to do so,<ref name="timeslegal">{{cite news
It is doubtful whether it was possible for Speyer to resign from the Privy Council or as a baronet, there being no normal mechanism to do so,<ref name="timeslegal">{{cite news
|title = The Position of Sir Edgar Speyer &ndash; Legal Aspect
|title = The Position of Sir Edgar Speyer &ndash; Legal Aspect
|work = [[The Times]]
|work = [[The Times]]
Line 202: Line 202:
}} (registration required).</ref> On 26 May 1915, Speyer and his family left for America.<ref name="ODNB" />
}} (registration required).</ref> On 26 May 1915, Speyer and his family left for America.<ref name="ODNB" />


In June 1915, [[George Makgill|Sir George Makgill]], Secretary of the [[British Empire Union|Anti-German Union]], applied for permission from the High Court to issue ''[[quo warranto]]'' [[writ]]s against Speyer and [[Ernest Cassel|Sir Ernest Cassel]], another German-born Privy Counsellor, requiring them to prove their right to hold that position.<ref name="times4">{{cite news
In June 1915, [[George Makgill|Sir George Makgill]], Secretary of the [[British Empire Union|Anti-German Union]] applied for permission from the High Court to issue ''[[quo warranto]]'' [[writ]]s against Speyer and [[Ernest Cassel|Sir Ernest Cassel]], another German born Privy Counsellor, requiring them to prove their right to hold that position.<ref name="times4">{{cite news
|title = Privy Councillors of Alien Birth &ndash; Re Sir Edgar Speyer and Sir Ernest Cassel
|title = Privy Councillors of Alien Birth &ndash; Re Sir Edgar Speyer and Sir Ernest Cassel
|work = [[The Times]]
|work = [[The Times]]
Line 209: Line 209:
|url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/emailArticleViewer.arc?articleId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1915-06-24-03-001,ARCHIVE-The_Times-1915-06-24-03
|url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/emailArticleViewer.arc?articleId=ARCHIVE-The_Times-1915-06-24-03-001,ARCHIVE-The_Times-1915-06-24-03
|accessdate = 2008-09-05
|accessdate = 2008-09-05
}} (registration required).</ref> Makgill's claim was that the [[Act of Settlement 1701]] prevented a person born outside Britain or its [[dominion]]s from being a Privy Counsellor. In December 1915, [[Lord Chief Justice]] [[Rufus Isaacs, 1st Marquess of Reading|Lord Reading]] rejected the application on the grounds that the relevant sections of the Act of Settlement had been repealed by later legislation.<ref name="times5">{{cite news
}} (registration required).</ref> Makgill's claim was that the [[Act of Settlement 1701]] prevented a person born outside Britain or its [[dominion]]s from being a Privy Counsellor. In December 1915, [[Lord Chief Justice]] [[Rufus Isaacs, 1st Marquess of Reading|Lord Reading]], rejected the application on the grounds that the parts of the Act of Settlement that prohibited this had been repealed by later legislation.<ref name="times5">{{cite news
|title = The Case of Sir Edgar Speyer - Privy Councillors of Alien Birth &ndash; Right to Hold OFfice
|title = The Case of Sir Edgar Speyer - Privy Councillors of Alien Birth &ndash; Right to Hold OFfice
|work = [[The Times]]
|work = [[The Times]]

Revision as of 23:30, 3 December 2008

Sir Edgar Speyer
Sir Edgar Speyer by Sir William Orpen, 1914
Born7 September 1862
Died16 February 1932
NationalityAmerican/British
Occupation(s)Banker
Philanthropist
TitleChairman of Underground Electric Railways Company of London Limited
Term1906–1915
PredecessorCharles Yerkes
SuccessorThomas Farrer, 2nd Baron Farrer
SpouseLeonora Speyer
Children3

Sir Edgar Speyer, 1st Baronet (7 September 1862 – 16 February 1932) was an American-born financier and philanthropist of German Jewish ancestry.[1] He became a British citizen in 1892 and was chairman of Speyer Brothers, the British branch of his family’s international finance house, and chairman of the Underground Electric Railways Company of London Limited (UERL, forerunner of the London Underground) from 1906 to 1915. He was a supporter of the musical arts and largely funded the Promenade Concerts until 1914. For his philanthropy he was made a baronet in 1906 and a Privy Counsellor in 1909.

After the start of the First World War, he became a subject of anti-German attacks in the press. Speyer resigned as chairman of the UERL and went to the United States in 1915. In 1921, following an investigation of accusations that he traded with the enemy during the war and other wartime conduct not compatible with his British citizenship, his naturalisation was revoked by the British government and he was struck off the list of members of the Privy Council.

Life to 1914

Family

Speyer was born on 7 September 1862 in New York, the second son of German Jewish parents, Gustavus Speyer and Sophia Speyer (née Rubino) from Frankfurt. His father was an international banker with businesses in Frankfurt, New York and London. Speyer was educated at the Realgymnasium in Frankfurt. In 1902, in London, Speyer married the American violinist Leonora von Stosch.[1][2] They had met at concert held by Maude Valerie White at which Leonora had performed.[3] They had three daughters: Pamela, Leonora and Vivien Claire.

Financier

In 1884, Speyer became a partner in each of his father's companies.[1] He headed the Frankfurt office for three years before moving to the London office, Speyer Brothers, in 1887, to take control there. The firm specialised in arbitrage with Europe and the United States, and the financing of railway projects. His older brother, James, headed the New York company.[1] On 29 February 1892, Speyer became a naturalised British citizen.[4]

Logo of the Underground Electric Railways of London, 1908

Speyer Brothers' involvement in railway finance brought Speyer into contact with American Charles Yerkes in 1900. In Chicago, Yerkes had led the development of the city's urban transport system, and he came to London to capitalise on the emerging opportunities for new deep level underground "tube" railways there. He and Speyer headed a consortium of international investors involved in the construction of three of London’s underground railways and the electrification of a fourth.[5]

With Yerkes as chairman, the UERL was established in 1902 with a capitalisation of £5 million with the majority of shares sold to overseas investors.[6] Further share issues followed, which, by 1903, raised a total of £18 million (£2.44 billion today)[7] to be used across all of the UERL's projects.[8] Yerkes died in 1905, and Speyer took his place as chairman of the UERL.[1] By 1907, the three new railways had opened and the electrification works had been completed. Despite the UERL's engineering success in carrying out the works in such a short time, the company was in a difficult financial position. The pre-opening estimates of passenger numbers proved to be greatly over-optimistic and revenues were not covering operating costs.[9] Speyer, with Managing Director Albert Stanley, struggled for a number of years to restore the finances. This was only achieved with the purchase of the London General Omnibus Company in 1912, the profits of which could be used to offset losses elsewhere in the group.[10][11]

Philanthropist and patron

As head of the London arm of the family businesses, Speyer became very wealthy. He owned a pair of neighbouring houses at 44 and 46 Grosvenor Street, Mayfair, which he had rebuilt as a single residence at the cost of £150,000 (approximately £19.3 million today)[7][12] The works were carried by Detmar Blow and Fernand Billery in 1910 and 1911; they provided the house with a "Beaux-Arts" style portland stone façade and lavish interiors including 11 bedrooms and a large music room.[13][14] Speyer also had a large country house built in 1908, at the fashionable Edwardian resort of Overstrand on the Norfolk coast. The house was named "Sea Marge" (meaning land that borders the sea) and was designed in the Mock Tudor style surrounded by Italianate gardens.[15][16] In December 1904, Speyer donated £5,700 to replace the funds lost be investors in the failure of a penny savings bank at Needham Market, Suffolk.[17]

The Queen's Hall, 1893

Speyer was a music lover and patron of the arts, frequently holding concerts in his home. He was friends with composers Edward Elgar, Edvard Grieg, Richard Strauss, Claude Debussy and Percy Grainger and the German cellist and composer Hugo Becker. He was chairman of the Classical Concert Society until 1912 and, following financial problems experienced by Robert Newman, chairman of the Queen's Hall Concert board from 1902 to 1914, paying £2,000 per year (£270,000 today)[7] to underwrite the Promenade Concerts.[1][18][19] He was described as "the sole monetary force which kept the Queen's Hall Orchestra afloat".[20] Speyer brought Strauss to London to conduct the first English performance of Ein Heldenleben.[21] Becker's Three Pieces for Cello with Piano Accompaniment and Strauss's Salome were dedicated to Speyer.[22][23] Speyer also contributed to the foundation of Whitechapel Art Gallery where he was a trustee.[1][24] He was president of Poplar Hospital and sat on the board of the King Edward's Hospital Fund,[1] to which he donated approximately £25,000 in 1902 (£3.43 million today).[7][25]

From 1909, Speyer was Honorary Treasurer of the fund raised to finance Robert Falcon Scott's 1910 British Antarctic Expedition to which he donated £1,000 of the £40,000 that was required.[26] Speyer was prepared to take personal responsibility for a share of the liabilities of the expedition, although the money raised from public donations was sufficient.[27] Mount Speyer (78°52′00″S, 160°42′00″E) in Antarctica is named in his honour,[28] and one of Scott's last letters was written to Speyer.[29]

Speyer owned violins by Stradivarius and Giuseppe Guarneri.[30] He also collected works of art, furniture and room interiors with which he decorated his homes. His portrait was painted by William Orpen and exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1914.[1] His wife's portrait was painted by John Singer Sargent in 1907.[31]

On 14 July 1906, Speyer was created a baronet.[32] Politically, Speyer was a Liberal and was a friend of H. H. Asquith, by whose recommendation he was made a Privy Counsellor (PC) in 1909.[33] In 1911, he was awarded the Order of the Crown, 2nd class by Kaiser Wilhelm II.[34]

Life after 1914

Solid, an anti-German cartoon regarding Germany's opposition to the Anglo-French entente, from Punch, 1911
GERMANY: "Donnerwetter! It's rock. I thought it was going to be paper."

Anti-German pressure

The end of the 19th century and the first decade of the 20th century, saw rising anti-German sentiment in Britain. Against a background of the naval arms race between Britain and Germany, this was characterised by novels warning of the rising military threat from Germany such as Erskine Childers' The Riddle of the Sands and invasion novels such as William Le Queux's The Invasion of 1910.

Following the British declaration of war with Germany on 4 August 1914, Speyer resigned as a partner of the Frankfurt branch of the bank. Following a Royal Proclamation on 11 September 1914,[35] requiring British subjects to have no links with companies doing business with Germany, Speyer resigned as a partner of the American bank.[36] Nonetheless, suspicions against Speyer's German parentage led to a hate campaign against him. Crowds gathered outside his home and jeered visitors. Accusations of disloyalty and treachery were made against him in the Press and he was accused of signalling to German submarines from his Norfolk house.[1]

On 17 May 1915, Speyer wrote to Asquith, then Prime Minister, asking him to accept his resignation as a Privy Counsellor and to revoke his baronetcy stating:

"Nothing is harder to bear than a sense of injustice that finds no vent in expression.
For the last nine months I have kept silence and treated with disdain the charges of disloyalty and suggestions of treachery made against me in the Press and elsewhere. But I can keep silence no longer, for these charges and suggestion have now been repeated by public men who have not scrupled to use their position to inflame the overstrained feelings of the people.
I am not a man who can be driven or drummed by threats or abuse into an attitude of justification. But I consider it due to my honour as a loyal British subject and my personal dignity as a man to retire all my public positions.
I therefore write to ask you to accept my resignation as a Privy Councillor and to revoke my baronetcy."[37]

He resigned as chairman of the UERL and from the boards of the King Edward's Hospital Fund, the Poplar Hospital and the Whitechapel Art Gallery .[37]

It is doubtful whether it was possible for Speyer to resign from the Privy Council or as a baronet, there being no normal mechanism to do so,[38] but the Prime Minister's response was supportive: "I have known you long, and well enough to estimate at their true value these baseless and malignant imputations upon your loyalty to the British Crown. The King is not prepared to take any step such as you suggest in regard to the marks of distinction which you have received in recognition of public services and philanthropic munificence."[39] On 26 May 1915, Speyer and his family left for America.[1]

In June 1915, Sir George Makgill, Secretary of the Anti-German Union applied for permission from the High Court to issue quo warranto writs against Speyer and Sir Ernest Cassel, another German born Privy Counsellor, requiring them to prove their right to hold that position.[40] Makgill's claim was that the Act of Settlement 1701 prevented a person born outside Britain or its dominions from being a Privy Counsellor. In December 1915, Lord Chief Justice Lord Reading, rejected the application on the grounds that the parts of the Act of Settlement that prohibited this had been repealed by later legislation.[41]

Revocation of naturalisation

On 2 August 1918, in a House of Lords debate on the Denaturalisation Bill, the subject of Speyer's membership of the Privy Council was brought up by Lord Lincolnshire, who condemned "the brutal and insolent German manner in which Sir Edgar Speyer had resigned his dignity". Lord Curzon announced that the Home Office was examining his membership of the council.[42] Speyer again offered the Prime Minister, then David Lloyd George, his resignation from the council, although no response was made.[43]

Following an investigation into Speyer's wartime conduct held in camera by the Home Office's Certificates of Naturalisation (Revocation) Committee, Speyer's naturalisation was revoked by an order dated 1 December 1921. On 13 December 1921 an order was issued by King George V for Speyer to be struck off the list of the Privy Council. He is the last person to receive this punishment, although others have resigned from the Privy Council since.[44]

The committee's decision was that Speyer had "shown himself by act and speech to be disaffected and disloyal to His Majesty; and [had]... unlawfully communicated with subjects of an enemy State and associated with a business which was to his knowledge carried on in such manner as to assist the enemy in such war." The committee's final opinion was "that the continuance of Sir Edgar Speyer's certificate is not conducive to the public good."[45] By this revocation, Lady Speyer and the couple's children also lost their British citizenship.

The report of the committee was published on 7 January 1922. The committee had considered nine issues in making its decision:[46]

  1. Retirement from Speyer & Co. – it was decided that Speyer had been slow and reluctant to resign as a partner of the American bank where he was still in partnership with his German brother-in-law, Edward Beit von Speyer.
  2. Association with enemy traffic – Speyer Brothers had continued to trade jointly with a Dutch firm, Teixeira de Mattos Brothers, between February and June 1915. As a firm of a neutral country, Teixeira, continued to trade with German businesses. The committee calculated that Speyer Brothers had made £1,000 by these trades, despite the company's accounts showing no trade with Germany when they were inspected. It concluded that "Sir Edgar Speyer seems to have preferred his private financial interests to the prompt discharge of his duty to the State."
  3. Communication with enemy subjects – Speyer had continued to correspond with his German brother-in-law throughout the war.
  4. Evasion of the censorship – in his correspondence with his brother-in-law, Speyer had used various means including aliases and intermediaries to avoid the censor inspecting his letters.
  5. Proposed return to Berlin – the contents of intercepted letters from Edward Beit von Speyer suggested that Speyer had proposed living in Germany after the war. Speyer denied this and claimed that the meaning of the letters had been misconstrued in the absence of his side of the correspondence being before the committee.
  6. Association with Muck – when living in America, Speyer had become friendly with Karl Muck the German conductor of the Boston Symphony Orchestra who was strongly pro-German even after the United States entered the war. Muck was suspected of being a German agent although this was not known by Speyer and Speyer claimed that their friendship was on the basis of their shared love of music.
  7. Association with Koren – in America, Speyer was friendly with John Koren an American statistician who represented the United States on the International Prisons Commission. In 1916, Speyer had funded a fact-finding trip by Koren to Europe during which Koren visited Germany and met Speyer's sister and friends. Although the committee considered the trip strange, they drew no inference of disloyalty from the events.
  8. The Boston Journal – in April 1917 on the advice of John Koren, Speyer had provided a loan to The Boston Journal newspaper to prevent it from going out of business. The newspaper had printed some articles of a pro-German nature and the committee thought it imprudent but not disloyal of Speyer to have lent the money.
  9. Paying money to enemy subjects – friends of Speyer had made claims at the Frankfurt bank for payment of sums due to them that had been in the hands of Speyer in London. Speyer had authorised the payments although this was not correct under the regulations. The committee commented that in similar circumstances it had shown leniency to others doing the same thing and would not have attached great importance to the matter if it had stood alone.[46]

On 7 January 1922, Speyer's partners published a letter supporting Speyer and rejecting the implications of his correspondence with his German relatives, stating that he was "incapable of any act of treachery against the country of his adoption".[47] Two days later, Speyer also issued a statement responding to the report and rebutting the committee's interpretation of the facts.[43] He claimed that he had been advised of the committee's investigation in 1919 and, after considerable delay by the Home Office, had persuaded it to carry out an investigation in America into allegations made against his conduct there. These investigations, he claimed, had demonstrated that the allegations were false, but, after he returned to Britain for the formal hearing in 1921, a further series of allegations were presented regarding his business transactions. Speyer claimed that the issues involved were of a trivial nature and were similar to those encountered by other British banks which had traded without censure. He claimed that "the whole thing is neither more nor less than the culmination of years of political persecution. The Home Secretary simply dared not give me the vindication to which I was entitled." He challenged the government to publish the evidence examined and "to point to a strip of material evidence that would induce any fairminded main to support the monstrous conclusions of this report."[43]

Final years

In January 1920, Speyer Brothers sold its shareholding in the UERL for approximately £1 million.[48] A month later, Speyer put the Grosvenor Street house up for sale although it did not reach its reserve price at auction.[12] On 1 April 1922, Speyer and his remaining partner in the London bank dissolved Speyer Brothers.[49] The Grosvenor Street house was eventually sold in early 1923 and became the American Women's club.[50] Speyer rejoined the surviving American and German branches of the family bank and continued to live in New York.[1] In 1929, he lived in Washington Square.[51] He died on 16 February 1932 in Berlin having travelled there for an operation on his nose.[52] He had continued to hold his baronetcy,Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names (see the help page). although it became extinct with his death as he had no male heirs.

After his death, Speyer's UK estate was assessed at £3,362 19s 1d and his US estate at $245,287,[1][53] approximately £290,000 and $5.59 million today.[7][54]

Legacy

Speyer's two principal legacies are the three deep level tube lines of the London Underground, and the Promenade Concerts. The former may not have been built without the finance he raised with Yerkes, and would have struggled without his chairmanship. The latter may have failed in the early 20th century without his financial support.[20]

After the American Women's club moved out, his London home served as the Japanese Embassy for some years and is now the offices of stockbrokers Killik and Co.[55] The Norfolk house was sold after his death and became a hotel.[15]

Sir Edgar and Lady Leonora were the basis of the characters Sir Hermann and Lady Aline Gurtner in E F Benson's 1919 novel Robin Linnet.[56]

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
  2. ^ "Marriage record". FreeBMD – Birth, Marriage and Death records. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
  3. ^ Adams 2007, p. 231.
  4. ^ You must specify date= when using {{London Gazette}}.
  5. ^ Between September 1900 and March 1902, the consortium purchased the Charing Cross, Euston and Hampstead Railway (CCE&HR), the Great Northern, Piccadilly and Brompton Railway (GNP&BR) and the Baker Street and Waterloo Railway (BS&WR) and the existing Metropolitan District Railway (MDR) – Badsey-Ellis 2005, p. 118.
  6. ^ The main investors in the consortium were Speyer Brothers, Speyer & Co. (the New York branch) and Yerkes' old bank, Old Colony Trust Company, Boston – Wolmar 2004, p. 170.
  7. ^ a b c d e UK Retail Price Index inflation figures are based on data from Clark, Gregory (2017). "The Annual RPI and Average Earnings for Britain, 1209 to Present (New Series)". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved May 7, 2024.
  8. ^ Like many of Yerkes' schemes in the United States, the structure of the UERL's finances was highly complex and involved the use of novel financial instruments linked to future earnings – Wolmar 2004, pp. 170–172.
  9. ^ The UERL had predicted 50 million passengers for the CCE&HR, 35 million for the B&SWR and 60 million for the GNP&BR in their first year of operation but achieved 25, 20.5 and 26 million respectively. For the MDR it had predicted an increase to 100 million passengers after electrification but achieved 55 million – Wolmar 2004, p. 191.
  10. ^ "London Traction Merger Arranged". The New York Times. 18 January 1912. p. 3. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
  11. ^ By having a virtual monopoly of bus services, the LGOC was able to make large profits and pay dividends far higher than the underground railways ever had. In 1911, the year before its take over by the UERL, the dividend had been 18 per cent – Wolmar 2004, p. 204.
  12. ^ a b "The Estate Market, Sir Edgar Speyer's House". The Times. 19 February 1920. p. 18. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  13. ^ Sheppard 1980, pp.44-57
  14. ^ Turner 1904, p. 544.
  15. ^ a b "The Sea Marge". TourNorfolk.co.uk. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
  16. ^ "Historic Hotels in Norfolk, the Sea Marge". Norfolkcoast.co.uk. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
  17. ^ "Edgar Speyer Saves Homes". The New York Times. 2 December 1904. p. 1. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
  18. ^ Langley, Leanne. "Points of Departure: Orchestral Concerts, Urban Transport and Sir Edgar Speyer in Edwardian London (abstract)" (PDF). The Proms and British Musical life. Retrieved 2008-09-05. Under Speyer's enlightened leadership... and with his private injections of cash, the Queen's Hall Promenade Concerts not only entertained full houses of 'popular' listeners, but acquired international esteem... {{cite web}}: line feed character in |quote= at position 73 (help)
  19. ^ Langley, Leanne (2007). "Chapter 2: Building an Orchestra, Creating an Audience: Robert Newman and the Queen's Hall Promenade Concerts, 1895–1926". In Jenny Doctor, David Wright and Nicholas Kenyon (ed.). The Proms: A new history. pp. pp.61–62, 67. ISBN 0-500-51352-X. [Speyer] had just married Leonora von Stosch, a Proms artist on Newman's books {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  20. ^ a b Bird 1982, p. 133.
  21. ^ Moore 1984, p. 383.
  22. ^ "Becker, Hugo". Strings Academy. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
  23. ^ "Salome". Schott Music. Retrieved 2008-09-05. Dedication: Meinem Freunde Sir Edgar Speyer
  24. ^ "Whitechapel Art Gallery". PassmoreEdwards.org. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
  25. ^ "$125,000 Gift by Edgar Speyer". The New York Times. 11 January 1902. p. 1. Retrieved 2008-11-29.. The exchange rate based on the gold standard was approximately £1 = $4.87.
  26. ^ "Scott of the Antarctic – 1868 to 1912". Solarnavigator.net. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
  27. ^ Huxley 1913, pp. 501-502.
  28. ^ "Mount Speyer". MapPlant. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
  29. ^ Letter of 16 March 1912, quoted in Turley 1914, p. 424
  30. ^ "List of instruments owned by Sir Edgar Speyer". Cozio.com. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
  31. ^ "Portrait of Lady Speyer". John Singer Sargent Virtual Gallery. Retrieved 2008-09-05.
  32. ^ You must specify date= when using {{London Gazette}}.
  33. ^ You must specify date= when using {{London Gazette}}.
  34. ^ Friedenwald 1911, p. 144.
  35. ^ You must specify date= when using {{London Gazette}}.
  36. ^ "Messers. Speyer and the War". The Times. 14 October 1914. p. 13. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  37. ^ a b "Sir Edgar Speyer – Charges of Disloyalty Disdained". The Times. 18 May 1915. p. 8. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  38. ^ "The Position of Sir Edgar Speyer – Legal Aspect". The Times. 19 May 1915. p. 5. Retrieved 2008-09-05. ...because a baronetcy is hereditary there is then little doubt that a baronet cannot resign his title and its privileges...", "None the less it would seem that the office [of Privy Counsellor] cannot be vacated by the holder... as the honour is conferred by the King he alone can take it away. (registration required).
  39. ^ "The King and Sir E. Speyer – Letter from Mr. Asquith". The Times. 25 May 1915. p. 6. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  40. ^ "Privy Councillors of Alien Birth – Re Sir Edgar Speyer and Sir Ernest Cassel". The Times. 24 June 1915. p. 3. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  41. ^ "The Case of Sir Edgar Speyer - Privy Councillors of Alien Birth – Right to Hold OFfice". The Times. 18 December 1915. p. 4. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  42. ^ "Status of Enemy Aliens – Debate in the Lords – Membership of the Privy Council". The Times. 3 August 1918. p. 7. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  43. ^ a b c "Sir E. Speyer's Reply – Attack on the British Government – "Partisan Report"". The Times. 9 January 1922. p. 12. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  44. ^ Staff reporter (1997). "Queen Accepts Aitken's Resignation". British Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 2008-09-17. The Queen has accepted Jonathan Aitken's resignation from the Privy Council. [...] Two former disgraced ministers, John Profumo and John Stonehouse, have also resigned from the Council, but no one has been thrown off since 1921 when Sir Edgar Speyer was struck off for collaborating with the Germans in the First World War.
  45. ^ You must specify date= when using {{London Gazette}}.
  46. ^ a b "Speyer Report Revelations – "Disaffected and Disloyal" – Trading with the Enemy". The Times. 7 January 1922. p. 5. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  47. ^ "Speyer Partners Defend Sir Edgar". The New York Times. 8 January 1922. p. 20. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
  48. ^ "Underground Railway Deal – Purchase of Speyer Shares". The Times. 5 January 1920. p. 12. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  49. ^ You must specify date= when using {{London Gazette}}.
  50. ^ "American Women's club – Opening of New Quarters". The Times. 27 June 1923. p. 14. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  51. ^ Klein 2003, p. 212.
  52. ^ "Sir Edgar Speyer – A Naturalised Alien's Honours". The Times. 18 February 1932. p. 17. Retrieved 2008-09-05. (registration required).
  53. ^ "Edgar Speyer Left Estate of $245,287". The New York Times. 23 January 1934. p. 17. Retrieved 2008-11-29.
  54. ^ 1634–1699: McCusker, J. J. (1997). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States: Addenda et Corrigenda (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1700–1799: McCusker, J. J. (1992). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1800–present: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. "Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–". Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  55. ^ "Killik & Co. – Our History, Grosvenor Street". Retrieved 2008-10-03.
  56. ^ Rintoul 1993, pp. 852-853.

References


Template:BD