User talk:Rdunn: Difference between revisions
→I'm Back: new section |
m Reverted edits by GaryDaFatSnail (talk) to last version by Daniel Case |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
:Unable to remove the message? That's odd; I thought my talk page was totally unprotected. You should have been able to. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 15:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC) |
:Unable to remove the message? That's odd; I thought my talk page was totally unprotected. You should have been able to. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 15:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
== I'm Back == |
|||
Well, well, well, I knew I was right in the end. You thought that you could get rid of me, and you did, just as I wanted. If you haven't guessed it yet, I am JerryPosterChild, JerryIsThePosterChild, MrRogersLovesYou, and MrRogersLovedYou. I am back yet again to prove how awful of a website Wikipedia is. You all thought that I was ''permanently banned'' but we all know that is just a lie. It is almost an oxymoron. I told you all if you struck me down, give me a month or so and I could be back in full power. You all decided to hide behind your ''special powers'' and act like you could not be fooled again. You promptly banned me and had a nice discussion about how if you just ignored me, I would go away. |
|||
I laugh at you all. |
|||
I again have manipulated the system and got another account. I again have fooled you all, and I bet I will do it again. You may be asking yourself "Who in the world would do such a thing? The only way it's possible is if someone directly unbanned his IP". Well, I would like to direct you all to exhibit A, [[User:Ohnoitsjamie]]. I played him like a fiddle on my talk page, and he unbanned me. The fool never saw it coming. But we all know this isn't the first time I've interacted with him... |
|||
I applaud you all for continually trying to stop me. Your mindless drones here sure do a good job of pushing me back with snarky comments and their own delusions of power. |
|||
Now what do I want, you may ask. I want what is rightfully mine. I want the account MrRogersLovesYou to be restored and unbanned. It was my only legitimate account and it was banned very wrongfully. I want Anetode and Ohnoitsjamie punished for their wrongful actions. I am here today because one of them banned me for no reason, and the other unbanned me for no reason. I hope I'm not too confusing with what I am getting at, I know that your personal user slaves who have this page on their watchlist will jump at the chance to revert this edit and then apply for a ban on my account, all while wetting themselves from the pointless joy over being able to grovel at your feet for one shining moment. |
|||
I don't hate you, just the website |
|||
--[[User:GaryDaFatSnail|GaryDaFatSnail]] ([[User talk:GaryDaFatSnail|talk]]) 19:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:56, 3 March 2009
helpme: January 2009
{{helpme}} If I were to add the "Mary Rose Trust" in the request article list would I put it in the:
or
- Maybe you should explain first what the "Mary Rose Trust" is? SoWhy 13:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is the charitable trust that looks after the Mary Rose wreck and other such things in the Historic Dockyard in Portsmouth. Im trying to request an article because i am supprised it
does not already exits for something this important.rdunn 13:35, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- A trust is an organization and not a historical event/account or an archeological site.
- Hope that helps.
- p.s. why not start it yourself?
- Cheers, JaakobouChalk Talk 17:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
It looks to me as if it would be more appropriate to add a bit more information about the Trust to the existing article at Mary Rose, where it gets mentioned a couple of times already. The "External link" from that page is to the Trust's website. I've made a redirect. PamD (talk) 16:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Re:Leonard of Quirm
I did it because two Discworld bios had already been merged as per deletion discussions (Lu Tse and Leonard) and it was only a matter of time before Bloody Stupid Johnson and General Tacticus were as well (since they had already been tagged) and I had no interest in tracking down "real world" citations for either of them. I needed a place to put Bloody Stupid Johnson, and Technology of the Discworld seemed like the best. Once he was there, Leonard seemed a natural fit. Serendipodous 14:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
helpme feb 2009
{{helpme}}
what do i do if an user is copying barnstars from other people's pages (against the rules it is to misrepresent)and then he reverts the edits that i make to remove the said barnstars? rdunnPLIB 11:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- The same we do with everyone who disrupts the project: Warn them that it's not okay to do so and if they continue, report the user to WP:ANI. Regards SoWhy 12:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
your question
if youve lost your password why dont you click the "E-mail new password" button in the login page? rdunnPLIB 12:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't register my email address, for practical privacy concerns. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notabilitypatrol (talk • contribs) 13:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
3 question
{{helpme}}
1)how many ways is there to view one's watchlist?
2)is there (still?) a page that show the most vandalised pages? (there was one sometime ago)
3)how long has DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION! been at the bottom of the editting box GNU thing? rdunnPLIB 11:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- See Help:Watchlist
- I have the feeling that page has been hidden per this concept
- A long, long time.
//roux 16:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Bank of Ireland robbery
Huh? It was a humorous aside about the incident. Delete it as off-topic from the talk page if you want but I don't see how it merits a civility warning (which I have taken the liberty of deleting from my talk page). Were you just handing these out to everybody who edited that page and got increasingly testy with each other? From your contribs, it seems you singled me out, and I fail to see how that was a comment on the contributors to the article, not the comment. Daniel Case (talk) 16:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Unable to remove the message? That's odd; I thought my talk page was totally unprotected. You should have been able to. Daniel Case (talk) 15:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)