User talk:Neurolysis

Wikipedia ads	file info – #178

Click here to message me.

I am currently offline. Please sign your name using four tildes ~~~~ when making your posts on talk pages. If you post here, I will reply on your talk page. If I post on your talk page, I don't really mind. Messages containing personal attacks or severe incivility will not be responded to, and may be removed.

---

If it was...

...a misunderstanding, here, it wasn't yours alone. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Hardly. Punctuation matters. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm not a bot!

Hey, there. Pardon this very trivial intrusion...My real and actual nickname is Nanobot (since my name is Nan and therefore Nano and very short hop to Nanobot...I completely forgot that that would be a concern here. Sorry! Do you really want me to change it?

LaNanobot

LaNanobot (talk) 19:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Image for deletion

Hey, you might want to check this out. Best. — R² 22:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Harm

This was actually very well said! --RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 01:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Nice userpage

		The Excellent Userpage Award
		Your userpage is excellently made and deserves to have an award for it. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:35, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Your Editor Review

On your editor review, you said, "I've been on Wikipedia for a good two years now"; however, according to edit counters, your first edit was on October 03, 2008, which is 6 months ago. Where are the rest of your contributions? GT5162 ^{(我的对话页)} 11:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

your mistake

Please stop undoing my edits to the wikibio on Fran Balkwill. She does not have an FRS. Check you facts before writing/editing wiki pages —Preceding unsigned comment added by Millhouses (talk • contribs) 13:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

[Fwd: Re: [Ticket#2009032810020725] image permissions]

Hello, just wondering how/when the alert messages regarding possible deletion (The Quiet Time.jpg, Chronicles.jpg) can get removed from Norbert Blei's page. He has received the permission notification below.

One note: he has since given me additional images to upload to his page that are not listed below. Are they covered, too, or do we need to have him send an email that specifically lists them?

Thanks, John

[Fwd: Re: [Ticket#2009032810020725] image permissions]

Dear Norbert Blei,

Thank you for your email.

03/28/2009 22:02 - Norbert Blei wrote: > > I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive > copyright of the following artwork, photography and book covers: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blei_new3.jpg > [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CHI_TOWN2.jpg > [2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ghost_of_Sandburg.jpg > [3]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Quiet_Time.jpg > [4]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CigaretteLoveSong.jpg > [5]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Die_mauer.jpg > [6]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chronicles.jpg > [7]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blei_coyote.jpg > > I agree to publish the works outlined under the Creative Commons Attribution > license, versions 3.0 and later. > > I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial > product, and to modify it according to their needs, as long as they abide by > the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. > > I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to > be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make > to the work will not be attributed to me. > > I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the > option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or > in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc. > > I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or > may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. > > Yours sincerely, > > Norbert Blei

We have received the permission for the image(s) and have made the necessary modifications to the Image page(s).

Thank you for providing this to us, and for your contribution to Wikipedia.

Yours sincerely, Matt Bisanz

JohnN (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Notice of request for deletion of editor Neurolysis :)

Neurolysis, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion#Neurolysis and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the nomination (unless you wish not to participate); such removal will not end the deletion discussion (actually it will). Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). --Dylan (chat, work, ping, sign) 23:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Cookies!

miranda has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

miranda 00:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about that my mistake. --Cheers Kyle1278 01:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

WSJ

Nuero, There is a great article in Wall Street Journal about Wikipedia--charles moore (talk) 15:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The article is in the main section "opinion/ editorial" about the Wikipedia concept, its strengths, weaknesses.... it is very favorable .........--charles moore (talk) 17:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

try this: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123897399273491031.html --charles moore (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Compliments

I read this page some time ago, and was reading it again very recently. I wish to say that I think you've really improved over these last few months. I remember opposing your last RfA (no, I'm not trying to make you re-live that experience!), but since then you have become an even greater user than before. While I don't expect it to be for some time, I can see myself supporting your next RfA, assuming you continue your improvements, which I'm sure you will. You're experienced, polite, do great work wherever you're active, and are a helpful editor; great qualities in any user. Very best wishes. Acalamari 17:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) Regarding your next RfA, I merely assumed that based on the current RfA standards and atmosphere you were waiting a little longer before running again. I don't believe you're "missing any issues" at all, as you've done a very good job in addressing past concerns. It is, of course, totally up to you when you run, and I'm not someone who opposes based on a "not enough time since last run" basis. Best wishes. Acalamari 17:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

In all fairness, I didn't realize it's been seven months since your last RfA: I actually thought it was more recent (I didn't check the dates). No, seven months is not too short, and even under your circumstances, that amount of time is reasonable, and it's even more reasonable as you have admitted you've made mistakes and have worked to improve them. My original comment on time, however, was that I wasn't expecting an RfA straightaway (i.e. running right now), with no prejudice towards an RfA that begins a few days or more from now. Not that I would oppose if you suddenly went for RfA now; I'm not bureaucratic in that way either. :) Acalamari 17:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome! Acalamari 18:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Meh...six months isn't that bad either. :D Acalamari 18:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

hey

Could you explain to me what was wrong with my uploaded file? I couldent understand the reason you gave on my talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zakariya bin Dana (talk • contribs) 18:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Gotcha, thanks

That makes sense, that was my first time uploading any media to Wikipedia, and I wasn't fully aware of the procedure, so sorry about that.

Thanks for the help. Zakariya bin Dana (talk) 18:51, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

• Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
• News and notes: Statistics, Wikipedia research and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
• Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
• WikiProject report: WikiProject China
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Userpage

Greetings. Is there a reason your userpage shows only one revision? Requesting its deletion shortly before an RfA does not inspire a lot of confidence in your transparency. I would also suggest you reconsider the confrontational edit notice. Regards, Skomorokh 20:09, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

well done.

direct, to the point, and concise ... I like it! — Ched :  ?  20:51, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Your RfA

It's nice to see that you're running for adminship again. GT5162 ^{(我的对话页)} 20:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Um...

Is this really you? --Dylan (chat, work, ping, sign) 00:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

I doubt it, to be honest. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

He already responded on his talk page, it indeed was not Neuro. --Dylan (chat, work, ping, sign) 00:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Randy Leonard image - please do not delete -yet

Hi - you marked this image for deletion. As soon as I can figure out how to get proof of permission in a format acceptable to WP - I will do so. Just haven't had a chance to do it yet. I requested the email from Leonard's office, and his aid took the pic. I explained that the image had to be "public domain" - no worries on their part. Just let me figure out the technical mumbo jumbo and get it posted. sorry for the delay. Frank1ray (talk) 02:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Chevrolet Vega

Hello Chris- Please reduce resolution and clean up image Car and driver Vega GT #0 in Chevrolet Vega article. Thanks (VegavairbobVegavairbob (talk) 14:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC))

Chevrolet Vega

Thanks...can you do one more-clean up promo-(white color and sharpness) under awards and reviews, thanks (VegavairbobVegavairbob (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC))

I don't say this often....

But you're not already an admin?---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 17:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Norbert Blei page

Sorry, I don't understand what your comment means, re: "The images are no longer at PUF." Trying to determine how to get the "possible deletion" message removed under The Quiet Time.jpg and Chronicles.jpg, now that a ticket has been issued clearing them from deletion? Thanks, John JohnN (talk) 20:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Norbert Blei page-more

Hi, Chris. Sorry to beat a dead horse, but this message is still currently under both photos: This content has an uncertain copyright status and is pending deletion. You can comment on its removal. Do I need to do something more to make it 'gone'? Thanks, John JohnN (talk) 21:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Deletion messages that won't go away

Weird, both of those two photos still have the aforementioned deletion message right under them, both when I'm logged in AND when I'm not logged in... Thanks for pursuing this, John JohnN (talk) 22:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Chevrolet Vega

Chris- I am really upset. I spent a month and a half trying to get this article just right. for three years no one bothered with it.now its on watchlists because i made too many non-free files not knowing at first they're limited. please help. i need the image in the article you fixed today. Car and Driver Vega GT -0 it was deleted speedy because i did another file after a discussion and first one was deleted. comments have been in discussion- replacable images available, violates copyrights, etc. its a photo from a 1975 car and driver article of a vega in a race leading the race on the last laps. the subsection is about that particular vega winning the race. it's a historical photo of a historical vega that won a race. it can't be replaced. i'm getting worn out trying to convince that the text is not enough. the image is needed of the car to improve the article. please help. can you allow it to stay or can another administrator delete it. it was deleted after a discussion then again after made another file. why is it so difficult to keep this image. i included a rationel, reduced size, its not off the web. its a scan of my magazine photo. (vegavairbobVegavairbob (talk) 03:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC))

Adminship

I just noticed your candidacy, and added my two pennies worth. If you think my mere presence there will hurt your chances, let me know. On the other hand, CB is on there, and he's the reason I found that nomination, so maybe I should be nicer to him. I'm kind of puzzled by the opposes, as I've never found you to be uncivil, other than the occasional "F.U.", so either I haven't been trying hard enough to get on your bad side, or else the bribery must be working. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 10:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

TOC question

How did you get that nifty slide-bar table of contents? Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 11:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

OK, I put it at the top of my talk page (you can't see it, I'm only in preview mode) and the slidebar is all the way to the right, pushing my archive down. How do I fix it so it's like yours? I couldn't find that coding in your talk page, so I'm guessing it's embedded elsewhere. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 11:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

I just saved it, so you can tinker with it if you're willing. Just don't get too fancy or obscure. I'm technologically challenged.
 :( Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 11:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

"Fail moar"? I don't speak British. :) Well, that centers it but it still pushes the archive down. I'd like the archive opposite the TOC, as you have it. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 11:31, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Or is that French? I definitely don't speak French. Except for the parts that William of Normandy brought with him. Thanks for your help. I think I've got it the way I want it, on the left instead of centered, and opposite the archive. The "clear" was because the items below it were being interferred with by the items above it. Maybe there's a more elegant way to do that, but "clear" accomplishes the task. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 11:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

A "failbrowser"? Well, it's IE 6. The other nifty thing would be the search feature on the archive. However, you're using an archiving template and doing autoarchiving and such, and I don't think that would work for me. It's OK the way it is, just that the search feature and the 2 photos together probably won't work unless I design my own template, which seems like overkill. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 11:52, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

You're designing my own personal archive template? You're awesome. And all because I voted "support". Bribery does work. :) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 11:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

You did it without getting too fancy-schmancy, and it looks perfect now. Thank you! And in theory, I don't even have to list the archives - the search by itself should be sufficient, yes? This is how I learn this stuff - incrimentally. By the time I'm 93 1/2 years old, I should have it all figured out. :) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 12:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

It's true that they would need to know what to search for. But unless others are using the archives (and I've very seldom been called on anything in those pages), it's mostly me, and the way the archives are, previously I've had to open each one and look for a topic. Now I won't need to do that anymore. So I might as well just have the search and nothing else. :) Worth thinking about, anyway. :) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 12:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Just so we're {{clear}} on this, there's no question that others do use the archives, but typically just for something they can use against me. :) And since they'd be searching for a topic, this would actually help them too. Always glad to accommodate the trolls. Right before I have them indef'd. >:) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 12:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

OK, just one more thing. How come every time I come to your talk page, there's a different background color? Must be another trick. Not something I would use, I'm just curious. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 12:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

OK, so it must be something fancy-schmancy. To be really mean, you could occasionally use black as the background color. >:) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 12:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

No question your color schemes are tasteful. More to the point, they're readable. Sometimes you see a solid red background or some such, which is nearly impossible to read against. Your choice of pastels is most commendable... commendible... commendble... whatever it is. But for April Fool's Day, maybe at random during the day, you could convert it to black and then most or all of the writing would be invisible. Or you could convert the writing to white, so it would look like a chalkboard. Or to be REALLY mean, you could post something that looks like the infamous blue-screen. You see, my being technologically challenged is probably a good thing. 0:) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 12:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

User:Gurch, like this kind of thing? [1] Yeh, that's fairly annoying. And it was nowhere near April 1. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 12:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Car and Driver Vega GT #0

Chris- It shows the Vega about to win the race. I want it in the article because it captures a a precise moment in time.. it's very simple. the text can not give this effect and is not as effective without it and does increase readers understanding of this moment in time with an image of the car... how can i dispute it with the image now deleted? you know which one? you fixed it twice. (Vegavairbob71.167.64.213 (talk) 14:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC))

Re: DougsTech

Yeah, that was a while ago. :-) I can probably go diff diving if you're really interested, but it's probably not worth it. :-) Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 06:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Your application for Adminship

During my 5 years on Wikipedia, I have read some lying hypocrisy, but the lies and myths perpetrating from you are probably the most gross. I never commented on your newspaper blogging and slurs upon me until now, considering you, rightly, to be unworthy of my time and attention. I see now here [2] that you now want to be promoted to Adminship. You are completely unworthy of ever becoming an Admin - you must never be allowed to have any authority here over anyone. You are not a person to be trusted. Stay off my page and keep your bloody and far too belated unworthy apologies for the blog where you told your lies. Giano (talk) 07:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)