Jump to content

Salwa Judum: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Undid revision 319097251 by Salwajudumlies (talk)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Salwa Judum''' (translates as "Peace March") is anti-[[Naxalite]] movement in [[Chhattisgarh]], India, which started in 2005 as a civilian movement amongst the tribals of the region against their enslavement by [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)|Maoist]] terrorists, and later evolved into a state-funded [[self defense]] force as a [[counter-insurgency]] strategy<ref name=guar/><ref name=chid/> to bring the area dominated by [[Naxalite]] ([[Indian Maoists|Indian Maoist]]) terrorists back under democratically elected state control.
'''Salwa Judum''' (translates as "Peace March") is anti-[[Naxalite]] movement in [[Chhattisgarh]], India, which started in 2005 as a state-funded force as a [[counter-insurgency]] strategy<ref name=guar/><ref name=chid/> to bring the area dominated by [[Naxalite]] ([[Indian Maoists|Indian Maoist]]) back under state control. It gradually took shape of a civil war in the region<ref name=saga>[http://www.hindu.com/2006/06/26/stories/2006062603261000.htm The saga of Salwa Judum in Chhattisgarh] E.A.S. Sarma , ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Jun 26]], [[2006]].</ref>.


Chhattisgarh state has over the years trained a number of SPOs or 'Special Police Officers', from amongst the tribals, who are part of Salwa Judum in the state, also with its formation the state witnessed a marked rise in success against Naxalite action <ref>[http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cobra-reaches-bastar-to-join-antinaxal-ops/419612/ CoBRA reaches Bastar to join anti-Naxal ops] ''[[Indian Express]]'', [[Feb 05]], [[2009]].</ref>, as a result in 2008, Chhattisgarh along with neighboring [[Jharkhand]] accounted for over 65% of the total naxal violence in the country <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Centre_gives_tacit_nod_to_Salwa_Judum/articleshow/3948503.cms Centre gives its tacit approval to Salwa Judum] ''[[Times of India]]'', [[Jan 8]], [[2009]].</ref>. The Chhattisgarh government on [[February 5]], [[2009]], told the Supreme Court that the Salwa Judum was slowly disappearing in the State.<ref>.[http://www.hindu.com/2009/02/06/stories/2009020654901200.htm Salwa Judum disappearing: Chhattisgarh] ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Friday]], [[Feb 6]], [[2009]].</ref>.
Chhattisgarh state has over the years trained a number of SPOs or 'Special Police Officers', from amongst the unemployed tribals, who were given money, arms and a free hand to counter Naxal activities in the region. The region saw a spurt in violence and mass eviction of tribals from their land to camps in an attempt to isolate the Naxals from the masses. Chhattisgarh along with neighboring [[Jharkhand]] accounted for over 65% of the total naxal violence in the country <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Centre_gives_tacit_nod_to_Salwa_Judum/articleshow/3948503.cms Centre gives its tacit approval to Salwa Judum] ''[[Times of India]]'', [[Jan 8]], [[2009]].</ref>. The Chhattisgarh government on [[February 5]], [[2009]], told the Supreme Court that the Salwa Judum was slowly disappearing in the State.<ref>.[http://www.hindu.com/2009/02/06/stories/2009020654901200.htm Salwa Judum disappearing: Chhattisgarh] ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Friday]], [[Feb 6]], [[2009]].</ref>.


With success of counter-strikes on Naxalite hideouts in south Chhattisgarh, [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)|Maoist]] activities in the bordering districts of Orissa saw a rise in 2008, thus in Feb 2009, the Central government announced its plans for simultaneous, co-ordinated counter-operations in all [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)|Maoist]] extremism-hit states - Chhattisgarh, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Jharkhand, Bihar, UP and West Bengal, to plug all possible escape routes of Naxalites <ref>[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/Co-ordinated_operations_to_flush_out_Naxalites_soon/articleshow/4084039.cms Co-ordinated operations to flush out Naxalites soon] ''[[Economic Times]]'', [[Feb 6]], [[2009]].</ref>.
With success of counter-strikes on Naxalite hideouts in south Chhattisgarh, [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)|Maoist]] activities in the bordering districts of Orissa saw a rise in 2008, thus in Feb 2009, the Central government announced its plans for simultaneous, co-ordinated counter-operations in all [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)|Maoist]] extremism-hit states - Chhattisgarh, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Jharkhand, Bihar, UP and West Bengal, to plug all possible escape routes of Naxalites <ref>[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/Co-ordinated_operations_to_flush_out_Naxalites_soon/articleshow/4084039.cms Co-ordinated operations to flush out Naxalites soon] ''[[Economic Times]]'', [[Feb 6]], [[2009]].</ref>.
Line 7: Line 7:
==History==
==History==
[[Image:SalwaJudumsoldiers.JPG|right|thumb|Salwa Judum's members in Southern [[Chhattisgarh]]]]
[[Image:SalwaJudumsoldiers.JPG|right|thumb|Salwa Judum's members in Southern [[Chhattisgarh]]]]
[[Bastar district|Bastar]] and [[Dantewada district]]s of [[Chhattisgarh]] have traditionally been sparsely populated, rich in natural resources, and yet some of the poorest tribal regions. Here the Maoist terrorists ([[Naxalite]]s) have continued to enlarge their base by enslaving the local tribals over the past two decades, by the 1990s, they had formed a parallel government like the [[Taliban]] in the region, even issuing diktats to the tribals of the region <ref name=saga>[http://www.hindu.com/2006/06/26/stories/2006062603261000.htm The saga of Salwa Judum in Chhattisgarh] E.A.S. Sarma , ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Jun 26]], [[2006]].</ref>. The first rebellion against the Naxalites was the 'Jan Jagran Abhiyan', started by Mahendra Karma in 1991; this later collapsed, leading to large scale killings of tribals by Naxalites. So when another uprising occurred against Maoist diktats in 2005, like ban on collection of Tendu leaves, and participating in state elections, tribals near Kutru village in Bijapur tehsil of [[Dantewada district]] took out rallies in June 2005 <ref name="saga"/>, this time the government supported it. Later these tribals ran for safety to police camps fearing backlash from the Maoist ([[Naxalite]]s), which in turn provided them protection. This was the beginning of the police support to the movement, a local tribal leader, [[Mahendra Karma]], a Congress MLA and the leader of opposition in the State Legislative Assembly, jumped into the fray as a political opportunity becoming the public front he took the Bijapur-based movement to [[Dantewada]], Katreli and other villages in the region <ref name=guar>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/may/09/india.randeepramesh Inside India's hidden war] ''[[The Guardian]], [[May 9]], [[2006]].</ref><ref name=bus>[http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=310499 'Salwa Judum can't work in the long run'] Chhattisgarh Director General of Police Vishwa Ranjan. ''[[Business Standard]]'', [[January 13]], [[2008]].</ref>.
[[Bastar district|Bastar]] and [[Dantewada district]]s of [[Chhattisgarh]] have traditionally been sparsely populated, rich in natural resources, and yet some of the poorest tribal regions. Here the Maoists ([[Naxalite]]s) have continued to expand their base by recruiting the local tribals over the past two decades, by the 1990s, they had formed a parallel government in the region, even issuing diktats to the tribals of the region . The first sponsored operation against the Naxalites was the 'Jan Jagran Abhiyan', started by [[Mahendra Karma]] of the [[Indian National Congress|Congress party]] in 1991; this later collapsed due to lack of direct state sponsorship. So the next operation went ahead against Maoists involving tribals near Kutru village in Bijapur tehsil of [[Dantewada district]] in June 2005 <ref name="saga"/>with government support. Hundreds of tribals were evicted from their villages and foced into police camps in order to alienate the Maoist ([[Naxalite]]s). This was the beginning of the police support to the movement, [[Mahendra Karma]], Congress MLA and the leader of opposition in the State Legislative Assembly, grabbed the political opportunity and took onus to spread the Bijapur-based initiative to [[Dantewada]], Katreli and other villages in the region <ref name=guar>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/may/09/india.randeepramesh Inside India's hidden war] ''[[The Guardian]], [[May 9]], [[2006]].</ref><ref name=bus>[http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=310499 'Salwa Judum can't work in the long run'] Chhattisgarh Director General of Police Vishwa Ranjan. ''[[Business Standard]]'', [[January 13]], [[2008]].</ref>.


As Salwa Judum got stronger in the coming months, holding rallies village after village, and recruiting members, and its member started getting armed as SPOs as a part of setting up local vigilante groups across villages, as a government's counter insurgency move <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5072170.stm Villagers take on India's Maoists] ''[[BBC News]]'', [[June 23]], [[2006]].</ref>, the conflict with the Naxalites also escalated, and by September over 10,000 villagers from in Dantewada district of Chhattisgarh had to flee home fearing Naxalite action <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1241049.cms War against Naxals that backfired] ''[[The Times of India]]'', [[Sep 25]], [[2005]].</ref>, even the government forces had to bear the brunt of retaliatory moves of the Naxalites <ref>[http://www.rediff.com/news/2005/oct/11bidwai.htm Meeting the Naxal challenge] ''[[Rediff.com]]'', [[October 11]], [[2005]].</ref><ref>[http://www.hinduonnet.com/2005/09/05/stories/2005090512070100.htm Landmine attack near Bijapur in which 24 security personnel, including 22 CRPF personnel killed] ''[[The Hindu]]'', Monday, [[Sep 05]], [[2005]].</ref>, and increased activity of the Naxalite outfit [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)]] was also reported in the following months <ref>[http://www.hindu.com/2005/12/30/stories/2005123015200300.htm Naxal outfit Communist Party of India (Maoist) becomes active] ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Dec 30]], [[2005]].</ref>. By end 2006, just as tens of thousands of tribals, many carrying bows and arrows, gathered in the state capital, [[Raipur]], protesting against Maoist rebel violence <ref>[http://www.telegraphindia.com/1061220/asp/jamshedpur/story_7161471.asp People power to combat Maoists] ''[[The Telegraph (Kolkata)|The Telegraph]]'', [[December 20]], [[2006]].</ref>, over 50,000 people had already been displaced by the conflict <ref>[http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2006/12/19/indian_tribals_march_vow_to_defeat_maoists/ Indian tribals march, vow to defeat Maoists] [[Reuters]], ''[[Boston Globe]]'', [[December 19]], [[2006]]. </ref>
As Salwa Judum got stronger in the coming months, holding rallies village after village, and recruiting members, and its member started getting armed as SPOs as a part of setting up local vigilante groups across villages, as a government's counter insurgency move <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5072170.stm Villagers take on India's Maoists] ''[[BBC News]]'', [[June 23]], [[2006]].</ref>, the conflict with the Naxalites also escalated, and by September over 10,000 villagers from in Dantewada district of Chhattisgarh had to flee home fearing action <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1241049.cms War against Naxals that backfired] ''[[The Times of India]]'', [[Sep 25]], [[2005]].</ref>, even the government forces had to bear the brunt of retaliatory moves of the Naxalites <ref>[http://www.rediff.com/news/2005/oct/11bidwai.htm Meeting the Naxal challenge] ''[[Rediff.com]]'', [[October 11]], [[2005]].</ref><ref>[http://www.hinduonnet.com/2005/09/05/stories/2005090512070100.htm Landmine attack near Bijapur in which 24 security personnel, including 22 CRPF personnel killed] ''[[The Hindu]]'', Monday, [[Sep 05]], [[2005]].</ref>, and increased activity of the Naxalite outfit [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)]] was also reported in the following months <ref>[http://www.hindu.com/2005/12/30/stories/2005123015200300.htm Naxal outfit Communist Party of India (Maoist) becomes active] ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Dec 30]], [[2005]].</ref>. By end 2006, just as tens of thousands of tribals, many carrying bows and arrows, gathered in the state capital, [[Raipur]], protesting against Salwa Judum violence, [[Mahendra Karma]] arranged counter-rally of tribals stating that Naxal was the impediment to Dantewada development. <ref>[http://www.telegraphindia.com/1061220/asp/jamshedpur/story_7161471.asp People power to combat Maoists] ''[[The Telegraph (Kolkata)|The Telegraph]]'', [[December 20]], [[2006]].</ref>, over 50,000 people had already been displaced by the conflict <ref>[http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2006/12/19/indian_tribals_march_vow_to_defeat_maoists/ Indian tribals march, vow to defeat Maoists] [[Reuters]], ''[[Boston Globe]]'', [[December 19]], [[2006]]. </ref>


As the situation further escalated in the coming years, [[Human Rights Watch]] reported atrocities at both ends, and reported large scale displacement of the civilian population caught in the conflict between the Naxalites and Salwa Judum activists with at least 100,000 people moving to various camps in southern Chhattisgarh or fleeing to neighbouring Andhra Pradesh as of early 2008. <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Salwa_Judum_forces_too_violating_rights/articleshow/3238603.cms 'Salwa Judum, forces too violating rights'] ''[[The Times of India]]'', [[July 16]], [[2008]]."The 182-page report — ‘Being Neutral Is Our Biggest Crime: Government, Vigilante and Naxalite Abuses in India's Chhattisgarh State’ — documents human rights abuses against civilians, particularly tribals, caught in a tug-of-war between government forces, Salwa Judum and Naxalites. "</ref><ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7505252.stm Indian state 'backing vigilantes'] ''[[BBC News]]'', [[July 15]], [[2008]].</ref>, By mid-2008 the figure grew to 150,000 tribals being displaced. <ref name=live>[http://www.livemint.com/2008/07/10002054/How-the-Salwa-Judum-experiment.html How the Salwa Judum experiment went wrong] ''[[The Mint]]'', [[Jul 10]] [[2008]].</ref>.
As the situation further escalated in the coming years, [[Human Rights Watch]] reported atrocities at both ends, and reported large scale displacement of the civilian population caught in the conflict between the Naxalites and Salwa Judum with at least 100,000 people moving to various camps in southern Chhattisgarh or fleeing to neighbouring Andhra Pradesh as of early 2008. <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Salwa_Judum_forces_too_violating_rights/articleshow/3238603.cms 'Salwa Judum, forces too violating rights'] ''[[The Times of India]]'', [[July 16]], [[2008]]."The 182-page report — ‘Being Neutral Is Our Biggest Crime: Government, Vigilante and Naxalite Abuses in India's Chhattisgarh State’ — documents human rights abuses against civilians, particularly tribals, caught in a tug-of-war between government forces, Salwa Judum and Naxalites. "</ref><ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7505252.stm Indian state 'backing vigilantes'] ''[[BBC News]]'', [[July 15]], [[2008]].</ref>, By mid-2008 the figure grew to 150,000 tribals being displaced. <ref name=live>[http://www.livemint.com/2008/07/10002054/How-the-Salwa-Judum-experiment.html How the Salwa Judum experiment went wrong] ''[[The Mint]]'', [[Jul 10]] [[2008]].</ref>. There were reports of rapes, murders and entire villages being burnt by Salwa Judum members <ref>[http://www.rediff.com/news/2008/jun/19guest.htm Salwa Judum: Strategy that backfired] ''[[Rediff News]]'', [[June 19]], [[2008]].</ref>


As on [[4 March]] [[2006]] , a total of 45,958 Adivasi villagers from 644 villages in 6 blocks of Dantewada district have come under Salwa Judum programme, showing the popularity of the movement. Intelligence agencies strongly support the movement as front line of defence against naxalites.
As on [[4 March]] [[2006]] , a total of 45,958 Adivasi villagers from 644 villages in 6 blocks of Dantewada district were brought under Salwa Judum programme, were displaced from villages and sheltered in road side camps. Intelligence agencies strongly support the movement as front line of defense against naxalites.


Since the inception of the movement in 2005, over 800 people, including some 300 security personnel, have been killed by the Naxalites, SPO deaths alone total 98 — one in 2005; 29 in 2006; 66 in 2007; and 20 in 2008 <ref name=bus/><ref name=ple/>, when the Maoists rebels continued their attacks, though now considerably less dramatic from the previous years, they were now splitting into smaller groups and specifically targeting Salwa Judum leaders and security personnel who were ambushed in weekly markets in remote areas, and their weapons stolen, also posters threatening Salwa Judum leaders continued to appear in villages across Dantewada and Bijapur <ref>[http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cgarh-naxals-less-dramatic-more-lethal-now/339245/ at least 18 people associated with Salwa Judum were killed during this period ..] ''[[Indian Express]]'', [[Jul 23]], [[2008]].</ref>. However by mid-2008, movement's frontliner, Mahender Karma announced that it will soon cease to exist <ref name=live/>, and end 2008, saw Salwa Judum which had controlled the lives of tribal people in camps and its influenced villages for nearly three years losing its hold in the region; the number of people living in the camps dropped from earlier 50,000 to 13,000 and public support was dwindled away <ref>[http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/elections-ch/Election_Story.aspx?id=NEWEN20080072498&type=SpecialReport Salwa Judum may stay in Bastar after polls] ''[[NDTV]]'', [[November 13]], [[2008]].</ref>. An [[NHRC]] report published in October 2008, said that Salwa Judum having lost its earlier momentum was only restricted to its 23 camps in the [[Dantewada district|Dantewada]] and Bijapur districts of Chhattisgarh <ref name=nh/>
Since the inception of the movement in 2005, over 800 people, including some 300 security personnel, have been killed by the Naxalites, SPO deaths alone total 98 — one in 2005; 29 in 2006; 66 in 2007; and 20 in 2008 <ref name=bus/><ref name=ple/>, when the Maoists rebels continued their attacks, though now considerably less dramatic from the previous years, they were now splitting into smaller groups and specifically targeting Salwa Judum leaders and security personnel who were ambushed in weekly markets in remote areas, and their weapons stolen, also posters threatening Salwa Judum leaders continued to appear in villages across Dantewada and Bijapur <ref>[http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cgarh-naxals-less-dramatic-more-lethal-now/339245/ at least 18 people associated with Salwa Judum were killed during this period ..] ''[[Indian Express]]'', [[Jul 23]], [[2008]].</ref>. However by mid-2008, movement's frontliner, Mahender Karma announced that it will soon cease to exist <ref name=live/>. By end 2008, saw Salwa Judum which had controlled the lives of tribal people in camps and influenced villages for nearly three years was losing its hold in the region; the number of people living in the camps dropped from earlier 50,000 to 13,000 and public support was dwindling away <ref>[http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/elections-ch/Election_Story.aspx?id=NEWEN20080072498&type=SpecialReport Salwa Judum may stay in Bastar after polls] ''[[NDTV]]'', [[November 13]], [[2008]].</ref>. An [[NHRC]] report published in October 2008, said that Salwa Judum having lost its earlier momentum was only restricted to its 23 camps in the [[Dantewada district|Dantewada]] and Bijapur districts of Chhattisgarh <ref name=nh/>


==Development of Special Police Officers (SPOs)==
==Development of Special Police Officers (SPOs)==
Line 21: Line 21:
The Chhattisgarh state Police employs tribal youths as SPOs (Special Police Officers), which are essentially 4,000 youth, both ex-Naxalites and those drawn from Salwa Judum camps in the Bastar region, who are paid an honorarium of Rs 3,300 per month, with government of India contributing Rs 1,800 and the state police pitching in with another Rs 1,500, and given general weapon handling training, mostly .303 rifles, under the provisions of the Police Act which provides for engaging a person to assist security forces, and employed in the five Naxal-affected districts of Bastar region, to lead and guide the anti-Naxal forces during operations in the inhospitable jungles of Bastar and also to keep guard at relief camps housing Salwa Judum families.
The Chhattisgarh state Police employs tribal youths as SPOs (Special Police Officers), which are essentially 4,000 youth, both ex-Naxalites and those drawn from Salwa Judum camps in the Bastar region, who are paid an honorarium of Rs 3,300 per month, with government of India contributing Rs 1,800 and the state police pitching in with another Rs 1,500, and given general weapon handling training, mostly .303 rifles, under the provisions of the Police Act which provides for engaging a person to assist security forces, and employed in the five Naxal-affected districts of Bastar region, to lead and guide the anti-Naxal forces during operations in the inhospitable jungles of Bastar and also to keep guard at relief camps housing Salwa Judum families.


In 2008, there were 23 Salwa Judum camps in Bijapur and Dantewara districts of Bastar region where almost 50,000 tribals from over 600 villages had settled <ref name=bus/><ref name=ple/>. The government has defended the Salwa Judum movement and refrained from discrediting it, despite pressure from it Left allies, as setting up Village Defence Committees (VDCs), has been a tested model of police-civilian co-operation in conflict area such as Jammu & Kashmir and the Northeast, and dacoit-infested areas of Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and UP<ref>[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/Centre_defends_Salwa_Judum_as_necessity/articleshow/2918209.cms Centre defends Salwa Judum as necessity] ''[[Economic Times]]'', [[Apr 2]], [[2008]].</ref>. [[Ministry of Home Affairs (India)|Union Minister of Home Affairs]], [[P. Chidambaram]] has praised the role of special police officers (SPOs) in fighting Naxalism and called for their appointment “wherever required.” <ref name=chid>[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/Chidambaram_all_praise_for_SPOs_/articleshow/3949915.cms Chidambaram all praise for SPOs] ''[[Economic Times]]'', [[Jan 8]],[[2009]].</ref>, while the [[Chhattisgarh]] Chief Minister, [[Raman Singh]] has stated that "Salwa Judum is the answer to get rid of the naxal menace in the state.." <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Salwa_Judum_is_answer_to_naxal_menace_Raman_Singh/rssarticleshow/3958157.cms Salwa Judum is answer to naxal menace: Raman Singh] ''[[Times of India]]'', [[Jan 10]], [[2009]].</ref>.
In 2008, there were 23 Salwa Judum camps in Bijapur and Dantewara districts of Bastar region where almost 50,000 tribals from over 600 villages were settled <ref name=bus/><ref name=ple/>. The government has defended the Salwa Judum movement and refrained from discrediting it, despite pressure from Left allies and rights groups as setting up Village Defence Committees (VDCs), has been a tested model of police-civilian co-operation in conflict area such as Jammu & Kashmir and the Northeast, and dacoit-infested areas of Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and UP<ref>[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/Centre_defends_Salwa_Judum_as_necessity/articleshow/2918209.cms Centre defends Salwa Judum as necessity] ''[[Economic Times]]'', [[Apr 2]], [[2008]].</ref>. [[Ministry of Home Affairs (India)|Union Minister of Home Affairs]], [[P. Chidambaram]] has praised the role of special police officers (SPOs) in fighting Naxalism and called for their appointment “wherever required.” <ref name=chid>[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/Chidambaram_all_praise_for_SPOs_/articleshow/3949915.cms Chidambaram all praise for SPOs] ''[[Economic Times]]'', [[Jan 8]],[[2009]].</ref>, while the [[Chhattisgarh]] Chief Minister, [[Raman Singh]] has stated that "Salwa Judum is the answer to get rid of the naxal menace in the state.." <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Salwa_Judum_is_answer_to_naxal_menace_Raman_Singh/rssarticleshow/3958157.cms Salwa Judum is answer to naxal menace: Raman Singh] ''[[Times of India]]'', [[Jan 10]], [[2009]].</ref>.


==Controversy==
==Controversy==
Line 27: Line 27:
district of [[Dantewada]] and that the Chhattisgarh Government had "officially recruited 4200 Special Police Officers (SPOs); many of them being easily identifiable as minors".<ref>{{cite web|last1=Zemp|first1=Ueli|last2=Mohapatra|first2=Subash|url=http://www.otherindia.org/dev/images/stories/feda_child.pdf|title=Child Soldiers in Chhattisgarh: Issues, Challenges and FFDA’s Response|date=2007-07-29|accessdate=2009-05-31}}</ref> The [[Asian Centre for Human Rights]] (ACHR) also found that the Salwa Judum had engaged in the recruitment of [[child soldiers]].<ref>{{cite book|last=|first=|title=The Adivasis of Chhattisgarh: Victims of the Naxalite Movement and Salwa Judum Campaign|url=http://www.achrweb.org/reports/india/Chattis0106.pdf|publisher=[[Asian Centre for Human Rights]]|year=2006|location=[[New Delhi]]|accessdate=2009-05-31|isbn=81-88987-14-X|page=42}}</ref> Similar recruitment findings were also reported in the [[Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers]]'s "Child Soldiers Global Report 2008 – India".<ref>{{cite web|last=|first=|title=Child Soldiers Global Report 2008 – India|url=http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/topic,463af2212,469f2dcf2,486cb108c,0.html|date=2008-05-20|accessdate=2009-05-31|publisher=[[Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers]]}}</ref>
district of [[Dantewada]] and that the Chhattisgarh Government had "officially recruited 4200 Special Police Officers (SPOs); many of them being easily identifiable as minors".<ref>{{cite web|last1=Zemp|first1=Ueli|last2=Mohapatra|first2=Subash|url=http://www.otherindia.org/dev/images/stories/feda_child.pdf|title=Child Soldiers in Chhattisgarh: Issues, Challenges and FFDA’s Response|date=2007-07-29|accessdate=2009-05-31}}</ref> The [[Asian Centre for Human Rights]] (ACHR) also found that the Salwa Judum had engaged in the recruitment of [[child soldiers]].<ref>{{cite book|last=|first=|title=The Adivasis of Chhattisgarh: Victims of the Naxalite Movement and Salwa Judum Campaign|url=http://www.achrweb.org/reports/india/Chattis0106.pdf|publisher=[[Asian Centre for Human Rights]]|year=2006|location=[[New Delhi]]|accessdate=2009-05-31|isbn=81-88987-14-X|page=42}}</ref> Similar recruitment findings were also reported in the [[Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers]]'s "Child Soldiers Global Report 2008 – India".<ref>{{cite web|last=|first=|title=Child Soldiers Global Report 2008 – India|url=http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/topic,463af2212,469f2dcf2,486cb108c,0.html|date=2008-05-20|accessdate=2009-05-31|publisher=[[Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers]]}}</ref>


Some [[human rights|human rights organizations]] affliated to [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)|Maoist]] such as the [[People's Union for Civil Liberties]] has raised allegations that Salwa Judum is a government-backed organisation <ref name = "PUCL"> {{cite web | title = Findings about the Salwa Judum in Dantewara district | url = http://www.pucl.org/Topics/Human-rights/2005/salwa-judum-report.htm | date = [[2005-02-12]]}}</ref><ref name="SAIR"> {{cite web | title = Salwa Judum report | publisher = South Asia Intelligence Review of the South Asia Terrorism Portal | url = http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/sair/archives/4_33.htm}}</ref><ref name = ACHR> {{cite web | title = Salwa Judum report | publisher = Asian Council For Human Rights | url = http://www.achrweb.org/Review/2006/117-06.htm}}</ref>, supported by the [[Chhattisgarh]] government, but a fact finding commission of [[National Human Rights Commission of India]] ([[NHRC]]), appointed by [[Supreme Court of India]] found out that Salwa Judum was a "''spontaneous reaction by the tribals to defend themselves against the “reign of terror unleashed by the Naxalites''." The report also said that, 15 years after Jan Jagran Abhiyan , an earlier attempt to deal with Naxalites, "''local tribals once again mustered courage to stand up to the Naxalites, which only goes to show their sense of desperation''". <ref name=nh>[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/Existence_of_Salwa_Judum_necessary/articleshow/3565263.cms 'Existence of Salwa Judum necessary'] ''[[Economic Times]]'', [[Oct 6]], [[2008]].</ref><ref>[http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1196081 DNAIndia]</ref>. It also found out that allegations against Salwa Judum were distortions of truth by some biased human right organisations.<ref>[http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1196081&pageid=2 dnaIndia]</ref>
Some [[human rights|human rights organizations]] such as the [[People's Union for Civil Liberties]] have stated that Salwa Judum is a government-backed organisation <ref name = "PUCL"> {{cite web | title = Findings about the Salwa Judum in Dantewara district | url = http://www.pucl.org/Topics/Human-rights/2005/salwa-judum-report.htm | date = [[2005-02-12]]}}</ref><ref name="SAIR"> {{cite web | title = Salwa Judum report | publisher = South Asia Intelligence Review of the South Asia Terrorism Portal | url = http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/sair/archives/4_33.htm}}</ref><ref name = ACHR> {{cite web | title = Salwa Judum report | publisher = Asian Council For Human Rights | url = http://www.achrweb.org/Review/2006/117-06.htm}}</ref>, supported by the [[Chhattisgarh]] government, but a fact finding commission of [[National Human Rights Commission of India]] ([[NHRC]]), appointed by [[Supreme Court of India]] found out that Salwa Judum was a "''spontaneous reaction by the tribals to defend themselves against the “reign of terror unleashed by the Naxalites''." The report also said that, 15 years after Jan Jagran Abhiyan , an earlier attempt to deal with Naxalites, "''local tribals once again mustered courage to stand up to the Naxalites, which only goes to show their sense of desperation''" The report at places also stated about Salwa Judum: ""excesses like looting and burning of houses or makes note of the fact that many who joined did not come willingly"". <ref name=nh>[http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/Existence_of_Salwa_Judum_necessary/articleshow/3565263.cms 'Existence of Salwa Judum necessary'] ''[[Economic Times]]'', [[Oct 6]], [[2008]].</ref><ref>[http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1196081 DNAIndia]</ref>. It also found out that allegations against Salwa Judum were distortions of truth by some biased human right organisations.<ref>[http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?newsid=1196081&pageid=2 dnaIndia]</ref>
In its report released in 2007, the Committee Against Violence On Women (CAVOW), linked significant increase in incidences of violence against women in Chhattisgarh's [[Dantewara district]] to [[Communist Party of India (Maoist)|Maoist]], and called for a review of the Government's counter-insurgency strategy <ref>[http://www.hindu.com/2007/01/19/stories/2007011905501300.htm Report recommends withdrawal of Salwa Judum] ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Jan 19]], [[2007]].</ref>.
In its report released in 2007, the Committee Against Violence On Women (CAVOW), linked significant increase in incidences of violence against women in Chhattisgarh's [[Dantewara district]] Salwa Judum, and called for a review of the Government's counter-insurgency strategy. During release of the report, [[Arundhati Roy]] stated that ""etting up vigilante groups is infusing the country with violence"" <ref>[http://www.hindu.com/2007/01/19/stories/2007011905501300.htm Report recommends withdrawal of Salwa Judum] ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Jan 19]], [[2007]].</ref>.


In April 2008, a Supreme Court bench directed the state Government to refrain from allegedly supporting and encouraging the Salwa Judum: "It is a question of law and order. You cannot give arms to somebody (a civilian) and allow him to kill. You will be an abettor of the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code."; the state government had earlier denied, Salwa Judum being a state-sponsored movement <ref name=ple>[http://www.indianexpress.com/news/hearing-plea-against-salwa-judum-sc-says-state-cannot-arm-civilians-to-kill/290932/ Hearing plea against Salwa Judum, SC says State cannot arm civilians to kill] ''[[Indian Express]]'', [[Apr 01]], [[2008]].</ref><ref>[http://www.rediff.com/cms/print.jsp?docpath=//news/2008/mar/31sc.htm SC raps Chattisgarh on Salwa Judum] ''[[Rediff.com]]'', [[March 31]], [[2008]].</ref>, later it directed the state government to take up the remedial measures suggested in the NHRC earlier report <ref>[http://www.hindu.com/2008/09/20/stories/2008092055941300.htm Implement NHRC recommendations on Salwa Judum, Supreme Court asks Chhattisgarh government] ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Sep 20]], [[2008]].</ref>
In April 2008, a Supreme Court bench directed the state Government to refrain from allegedly supporting and encouraging the Salwa Judum: "It is a question of law and order. You cannot give arms to somebody (a civilian) and allow him to kill. You will be an abettor of the offense under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code."; the state government had earlier denied, Salwa Judum being a state-sponsored movement <ref name=ple>[http://www.indianexpress.com/news/hearing-plea-against-salwa-judum-sc-says-state-cannot-arm-civilians-to-kill/290932/ Hearing plea against Salwa Judum, SC says State cannot arm civilians to kill] ''[[Indian Express]]'', [[Apr 01]], [[2008]].</ref><ref>[http://www.rediff.com/cms/print.jsp?docpath=//news/2008/mar/31sc.htm SC raps Chattisgarh on Salwa Judum] ''[[Rediff.com]]'', [[March 31]], [[2008]].</ref>, later it directed the state government to take up the remedial measures suggested in the NHRC earlier report <ref>[http://www.hindu.com/2008/09/20/stories/2008092055941300.htm Implement NHRC recommendations on Salwa Judum, Supreme Court asks Chhattisgarh government] ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Sep 20]], [[2008]].</ref>


In December 2008, replying to a petition filed in the Supreme Court, the state government acknowledged that Salwa Judum and security forces had burnt houses and looted property <ref>[http://www.thehindu.com/2008/12/16/stories/2008121659190500.htm Salwa Judum victims assured of relief] ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Dec 16]], [[2008]].</ref>
In December 2008, replying to a petition filed in the Supreme Court, the state government acknowledged that Salwa Judum and security forces had burnt houses and looted property <ref>[http://www.thehindu.com/2008/12/16/stories/2008121659190500.htm Salwa Judum victims assured of relief] ''[[The Hindu]]'', [[Dec 16]], [[2008]].</ref>
Line 38: Line 38:


==Effects==
==Effects==
Encouraged by the highly positive results of the movement in the region, the government is planning to launch a people's movement in insurgency hit state of [[Manipur]] on similar lines. In 2006, [[Karnataka]] raised a similar force employing tribals youths to fight Naxalism in the state, as did [[Andhra Pradesh]] prior to it <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1524958.cms Tribal youths will now fight Naxals] ''[[The Times of India]]'', [[May 11]], [[2006]].</ref> Jharkhand is another state that has been successfully using SPOs to counter Leftwing terrorists.<ref name=chid/>
Encouraged by the results of the movement in the region, the government is planning to launch a people's movement in insurgency hit state of [[Manipur]] on similar lines. In 2006, [[Karnataka]] raised a similar force employing tribals youths to fight Naxalism in the state, as did [[Andhra Pradesh]] prior to it <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1524958.cms Tribal youths will now fight Naxals] ''[[The Times of India]]'', [[May 11]], [[2006]].</ref> Jharkhand is another state that has been successfully using SPOs to counter Leftwing terrorists.<ref name=chid/>


==In media==
==In media==
Line 50: Line 50:


==External links==
==External links==
* [http://cpjc.wordpress.com/ Campaign for Peace and Justice in Chhattisgarh]
* [http://www.achrweb.org/Review/2006/117-06.htm The Adivasis of Chhattisgarh: Victims of Naxalite Movement and Salwa Judum Campaign]
* [http://www.achrweb.org/Review/2006/117-06.htm The Adivasis of Chhattisgarh: Victims of Naxalite Movement and Salwa Judum Campaign]
* [http://www.channel4.com/news/microsites/U/unreportedworld/india.html Unreported World: India's Hidden War]
* [http://www.channel4.com/news/microsites/U/unreportedworld/india.html Unreported World: India's Hidden War]
* [http://www.cgnet.in/N1/ Naxal Issues]
* [http://www.cgnet.in/N1/ Naxal Issues]
* [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Anti-Naxal_Salwa_Judum_faces_axe_over_rights_abuse/articleshow/3504703.cms]
* [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Anti-Naxal_Salwa_Judum_faces_axe_over_rights_abuse/articleshow/3504703.cms]
* [http://www.iapl.net/reports/india/India_FFM_Report_Full.pdf Report of the IAPL Fact Finding Mission]
* [http://www.pucl.org/Topics/Human-rights/2006/salwa_judum.pdf A report on Salwa Judum by PUCL Chhattisgarh, PUCL Jharkhand, PUDR Delhi, APDR West Bengal,IAPL]
* [http://iapl.net/reports.html Video Documentary (20 mn.): A Few Myths & Facts About Salwa Judum Concentration Camps]


[[Category:Indian anti-communists]]
[[Category:Indian anti-communists]]

Revision as of 05:39, 11 October 2009

Salwa Judum (translates as "Peace March") is anti-Naxalite movement in Chhattisgarh, India, which started in 2005 as a state-funded force as a counter-insurgency strategy[1][2] to bring the area dominated by Naxalite (Indian Maoist) back under state control. It gradually took shape of a civil war in the region[3].

Chhattisgarh state has over the years trained a number of SPOs or 'Special Police Officers', from amongst the unemployed tribals, who were given money, arms and a free hand to counter Naxal activities in the region. The region saw a spurt in violence and mass eviction of tribals from their land to camps in an attempt to isolate the Naxals from the masses. Chhattisgarh along with neighboring Jharkhand accounted for over 65% of the total naxal violence in the country [4]. The Chhattisgarh government on February 5, 2009, told the Supreme Court that the Salwa Judum was slowly disappearing in the State.[5].

With success of counter-strikes on Naxalite hideouts in south Chhattisgarh, Maoist activities in the bordering districts of Orissa saw a rise in 2008, thus in Feb 2009, the Central government announced its plans for simultaneous, co-ordinated counter-operations in all Maoist extremism-hit states - Chhattisgarh, Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Jharkhand, Bihar, UP and West Bengal, to plug all possible escape routes of Naxalites [6].

History

Salwa Judum's members in Southern Chhattisgarh

Bastar and Dantewada districts of Chhattisgarh have traditionally been sparsely populated, rich in natural resources, and yet some of the poorest tribal regions. Here the Maoists (Naxalites) have continued to expand their base by recruiting the local tribals over the past two decades, by the 1990s, they had formed a parallel government in the region, even issuing diktats to the tribals of the region . The first sponsored operation against the Naxalites was the 'Jan Jagran Abhiyan', started by Mahendra Karma of the Congress party in 1991; this later collapsed due to lack of direct state sponsorship. So the next operation went ahead against Maoists involving tribals near Kutru village in Bijapur tehsil of Dantewada district in June 2005 [3]with government support. Hundreds of tribals were evicted from their villages and foced into police camps in order to alienate the Maoist (Naxalites). This was the beginning of the police support to the movement, Mahendra Karma, Congress MLA and the leader of opposition in the State Legislative Assembly, grabbed the political opportunity and took onus to spread the Bijapur-based initiative to Dantewada, Katreli and other villages in the region [1][7].

As Salwa Judum got stronger in the coming months, holding rallies village after village, and recruiting members, and its member started getting armed as SPOs as a part of setting up local vigilante groups across villages, as a government's counter insurgency move [8], the conflict with the Naxalites also escalated, and by September over 10,000 villagers from in Dantewada district of Chhattisgarh had to flee home fearing action [9], even the government forces had to bear the brunt of retaliatory moves of the Naxalites [10][11], and increased activity of the Naxalite outfit Communist Party of India (Maoist) was also reported in the following months [12]. By end 2006, just as tens of thousands of tribals, many carrying bows and arrows, gathered in the state capital, Raipur, protesting against Salwa Judum violence, Mahendra Karma arranged counter-rally of tribals stating that Naxal was the impediment to Dantewada development. [13], over 50,000 people had already been displaced by the conflict [14]

As the situation further escalated in the coming years, Human Rights Watch reported atrocities at both ends, and reported large scale displacement of the civilian population caught in the conflict between the Naxalites and Salwa Judum with at least 100,000 people moving to various camps in southern Chhattisgarh or fleeing to neighbouring Andhra Pradesh as of early 2008. [15][16], By mid-2008 the figure grew to 150,000 tribals being displaced. [17]. There were reports of rapes, murders and entire villages being burnt by Salwa Judum members [18]

As on 4 March 2006 , a total of 45,958 Adivasi villagers from 644 villages in 6 blocks of Dantewada district were brought under Salwa Judum programme, were displaced from villages and sheltered in road side camps. Intelligence agencies strongly support the movement as front line of defense against naxalites.

Since the inception of the movement in 2005, over 800 people, including some 300 security personnel, have been killed by the Naxalites, SPO deaths alone total 98 — one in 2005; 29 in 2006; 66 in 2007; and 20 in 2008 [7][19], when the Maoists rebels continued their attacks, though now considerably less dramatic from the previous years, they were now splitting into smaller groups and specifically targeting Salwa Judum leaders and security personnel who were ambushed in weekly markets in remote areas, and their weapons stolen, also posters threatening Salwa Judum leaders continued to appear in villages across Dantewada and Bijapur [20]. However by mid-2008, movement's frontliner, Mahender Karma announced that it will soon cease to exist [17]. By end 2008, saw Salwa Judum which had controlled the lives of tribal people in camps and influenced villages for nearly three years was losing its hold in the region; the number of people living in the camps dropped from earlier 50,000 to 13,000 and public support was dwindling away [21]. An NHRC report published in October 2008, said that Salwa Judum having lost its earlier momentum was only restricted to its 23 camps in the Dantewada and Bijapur districts of Chhattisgarh [22]

Development of Special Police Officers (SPOs)

Location of Dantewada and Bastar districts, the most affected regions in Chhattisgarh

The Chhattisgarh state Police employs tribal youths as SPOs (Special Police Officers), which are essentially 4,000 youth, both ex-Naxalites and those drawn from Salwa Judum camps in the Bastar region, who are paid an honorarium of Rs 3,300 per month, with government of India contributing Rs 1,800 and the state police pitching in with another Rs 1,500, and given general weapon handling training, mostly .303 rifles, under the provisions of the Police Act which provides for engaging a person to assist security forces, and employed in the five Naxal-affected districts of Bastar region, to lead and guide the anti-Naxal forces during operations in the inhospitable jungles of Bastar and also to keep guard at relief camps housing Salwa Judum families.

In 2008, there were 23 Salwa Judum camps in Bijapur and Dantewara districts of Bastar region where almost 50,000 tribals from over 600 villages were settled [7][19]. The government has defended the Salwa Judum movement and refrained from discrediting it, despite pressure from Left allies and rights groups as setting up Village Defence Committees (VDCs), has been a tested model of police-civilian co-operation in conflict area such as Jammu & Kashmir and the Northeast, and dacoit-infested areas of Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and UP[23]. Union Minister of Home Affairs, P. Chidambaram has praised the role of special police officers (SPOs) in fighting Naxalism and called for their appointment “wherever required.” [2], while the Chhattisgarh Chief Minister, Raman Singh has stated that "Salwa Judum is the answer to get rid of the naxal menace in the state.." [24].

Controversy

There have been numerous reports that the Salwa Judum had recruited minors for its armed forces. A primary survey evaluated by the Forum for Fact-finding Documentation and Advocacy (FFDA) determined that over 12,000 minors were being used by the Salwa Judum in the southern district of Dantewada and that the Chhattisgarh Government had "officially recruited 4200 Special Police Officers (SPOs); many of them being easily identifiable as minors".[25] The Asian Centre for Human Rights (ACHR) also found that the Salwa Judum had engaged in the recruitment of child soldiers.[26] Similar recruitment findings were also reported in the Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers's "Child Soldiers Global Report 2008 – India".[27]

Some human rights organizations such as the People's Union for Civil Liberties have stated that Salwa Judum is a government-backed organisation [28][29][30], supported by the Chhattisgarh government, but a fact finding commission of National Human Rights Commission of India (NHRC), appointed by Supreme Court of India found out that Salwa Judum was a "spontaneous reaction by the tribals to defend themselves against the “reign of terror unleashed by the Naxalites." The report also said that, 15 years after Jan Jagran Abhiyan , an earlier attempt to deal with Naxalites, "local tribals once again mustered courage to stand up to the Naxalites, which only goes to show their sense of desperation" The report at places also stated about Salwa Judum: ""excesses like looting and burning of houses or makes note of the fact that many who joined did not come willingly"". [22][31]. It also found out that allegations against Salwa Judum were distortions of truth by some biased human right organisations.[32]

In its report released in 2007, the Committee Against Violence On Women (CAVOW), linked significant increase in incidences of violence against women in Chhattisgarh's Dantewara district Salwa Judum, and called for a review of the Government's counter-insurgency strategy. During release of the report, Arundhati Roy stated that ""etting up vigilante groups is infusing the country with violence"" [33].

In April 2008, a Supreme Court bench directed the state Government to refrain from allegedly supporting and encouraging the Salwa Judum: "It is a question of law and order. You cannot give arms to somebody (a civilian) and allow him to kill. You will be an abettor of the offense under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code."; the state government had earlier denied, Salwa Judum being a state-sponsored movement [19][34], later it directed the state government to take up the remedial measures suggested in the NHRC earlier report [35]

In December 2008, replying to a petition filed in the Supreme Court, the state government acknowledged that Salwa Judum and security forces had burnt houses and looted property [36]

Later In September 2009 the government of India defended the Chhattisgarh government’s Salwa Judum strategy of arming tribals to attack Maoist insurgents and their sympathizers. “I think the Salwa Judum was a genuine people’s movement and the naxalites were frightened by it. But thanks to NGOs and other extraneous elements, it was undermined and completely destroyed.”[37]

Effects

Encouraged by the results of the movement in the region, the government is planning to launch a people's movement in insurgency hit state of Manipur on similar lines. In 2006, Karnataka raised a similar force employing tribals youths to fight Naxalism in the state, as did Andhra Pradesh prior to it [38] Jharkhand is another state that has been successfully using SPOs to counter Leftwing terrorists.[2]

In media

Further reading

  • The Adivasis of Chhattisgarh: Victims of the Naxalite Movement and Salwa Judum Campaign, by Asian Centre for Human Rights. Published by Asian Centre for Human Rights, 2006.

References

  1. ^ a b Inside India's hidden war The Guardian, May 9, 2006.
  2. ^ a b c Chidambaram all praise for SPOs Economic Times, Jan 8,2009.
  3. ^ a b The saga of Salwa Judum in Chhattisgarh E.A.S. Sarma , The Hindu, Jun 26, 2006.
  4. ^ Centre gives its tacit approval to Salwa Judum Times of India, Jan 8, 2009.
  5. ^ .Salwa Judum disappearing: Chhattisgarh The Hindu, Friday, Feb 6, 2009.
  6. ^ Co-ordinated operations to flush out Naxalites soon Economic Times, Feb 6, 2009.
  7. ^ a b c 'Salwa Judum can't work in the long run' Chhattisgarh Director General of Police Vishwa Ranjan. Business Standard, January 13, 2008.
  8. ^ Villagers take on India's Maoists BBC News, June 23, 2006.
  9. ^ War against Naxals that backfired The Times of India, Sep 25, 2005.
  10. ^ Meeting the Naxal challenge Rediff.com, October 11, 2005.
  11. ^ Landmine attack near Bijapur in which 24 security personnel, including 22 CRPF personnel killed The Hindu, Monday, Sep 05, 2005.
  12. ^ Naxal outfit Communist Party of India (Maoist) becomes active The Hindu, Dec 30, 2005.
  13. ^ People power to combat Maoists The Telegraph, December 20, 2006.
  14. ^ Indian tribals march, vow to defeat Maoists Reuters, Boston Globe, December 19, 2006.
  15. ^ 'Salwa Judum, forces too violating rights' The Times of India, July 16, 2008."The 182-page report — ‘Being Neutral Is Our Biggest Crime: Government, Vigilante and Naxalite Abuses in India's Chhattisgarh State’ — documents human rights abuses against civilians, particularly tribals, caught in a tug-of-war between government forces, Salwa Judum and Naxalites. "
  16. ^ Indian state 'backing vigilantes' BBC News, July 15, 2008.
  17. ^ a b How the Salwa Judum experiment went wrong The Mint, Jul 10 2008.
  18. ^ Salwa Judum: Strategy that backfired Rediff News, June 19, 2008.
  19. ^ a b c Hearing plea against Salwa Judum, SC says State cannot arm civilians to kill Indian Express, Apr 01, 2008.
  20. ^ at least 18 people associated with Salwa Judum were killed during this period .. Indian Express, Jul 23, 2008.
  21. ^ Salwa Judum may stay in Bastar after polls NDTV, November 13, 2008.
  22. ^ a b 'Existence of Salwa Judum necessary' Economic Times, Oct 6, 2008.
  23. ^ Centre defends Salwa Judum as necessity Economic Times, Apr 2, 2008.
  24. ^ Salwa Judum is answer to naxal menace: Raman Singh Times of India, Jan 10, 2009.
  25. ^ Zemp, Ueli; Mohapatra, Subash (2007-07-29). "Child Soldiers in Chhattisgarh: Issues, Challenges and FFDA's Response" (PDF). Retrieved 2009-05-31.
  26. ^ The Adivasis of Chhattisgarh: Victims of the Naxalite Movement and Salwa Judum Campaign (PDF). New Delhi: Asian Centre for Human Rights. 2006. p. 42. ISBN 81-88987-14-X. Retrieved 2009-05-31.
  27. ^ "Child Soldiers Global Report 2008 – India". Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers. 2008-05-20. Retrieved 2009-05-31.
  28. ^ "Findings about the Salwa Judum in Dantewara district". 2005-02-12. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  29. ^ "Salwa Judum report". South Asia Intelligence Review of the South Asia Terrorism Portal.
  30. ^ "Salwa Judum report". Asian Council For Human Rights.
  31. ^ DNAIndia
  32. ^ dnaIndia
  33. ^ Report recommends withdrawal of Salwa Judum The Hindu, Jan 19, 2007.
  34. ^ SC raps Chattisgarh on Salwa Judum Rediff.com, March 31, 2008.
  35. ^ Implement NHRC recommendations on Salwa Judum, Supreme Court asks Chhattisgarh government The Hindu, Sep 20, 2008.
  36. ^ Salwa Judum victims assured of relief The Hindu, Dec 16, 2008.
  37. ^ Centre for new war on Maoists "The Hindu",Sep 24, 2009.
  38. ^ Tribal youths will now fight Naxals The Times of India, May 11, 2006.
  39. ^ India's Hidden War Channel 4, Friday 27 October 2006.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Salwa_Judum&oldid=319177667"