User talk:Emperor: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Emperor/Archive 2009. |
Merge discussion |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
I saw your post on the talk page for the (incorrectly) titled ''Enter the Gauntlet'', so I thought I would let you know that it is now moved to [[Spider-Man: The Gauntlet]]. --[[User:Spidey104|<font color="red">'''Spidey'''</font>]][[User talk:Spidey104#top|<font color="blue">''104''</font>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Spidey104|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup> 22:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC) |
I saw your post on the talk page for the (incorrectly) titled ''Enter the Gauntlet'', so I thought I would let you know that it is now moved to [[Spider-Man: The Gauntlet]]. --[[User:Spidey104|<font color="red">'''Spidey'''</font>]][[User talk:Spidey104#top|<font color="blue">''104''</font>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Spidey104|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup> 22:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Merge discussion== |
|||
I closed [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas K. Dye]] as merge. [[User:Barberio]] disputed this close and opened a [[Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_December_1#Thomas_K._Dye_.28closed.29|deletion review]], which was closed as the admin argued that merge closes are not considered at DRV. I merged the material to [[Newshounds]] and redirected the article; Barberio has reverted the redirect, though the material remains merged. A discussion on the merge is at [[Talk:Newshounds#Merge of Thomas K. Dye]]; your participation would be welcome. [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="background-color:white; color:grey;">&</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:white; color:black;">Windows</span>]] 01:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:40, 3 December 2009
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
IOM infobox
Just following up on this...
I've move the template to a live page - {{Infobox comics in other media}} and placed it on most of the IOM articles.
I've also gotten some feed back on my talk if you're interested.
- ~~``
Carol Danvers Death?
I changed the text stating the death of the character, as it is more plausible to assume from the interview and from her addition to the New Avengers cast, that Carol will fake her death. Either way, we do not know for sure the state of her during dark reign, and the source interview is inconclusive. I changed the text to reflect what we know for sure.
More minor stuff-questions
1) Doom (film) has a character, Carmack, that people keep saying is named for a real person, a programmer for the Doom game. But since Carmack the fictional character is an evil man, I've been deleting the references. Am I right to do so? It's one thing to say 'Funky Flashman is based on Stan Lee's mannerisms' when Funky is a fictional slave trader but a name is a name.
2) The Nathan Thompson Show. Kinda got out of control there re: history so I'm throwing it out with no commentary.
Reptile Aliens
Hiya - heres yet another thing that you might be able to russle up some help on: The Reptilian Humanoids article is undergoing a bit of a renovation and it's emerged that wikipedia currently has nothing on the common reptile alien type in ufology[1]. The namespace Reptilian aliens currently just redirects to Reptilian Humanoids but we should probably create an article there in it's place. Your thoughts on this appreciated. Artw (talk) 20:05, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Let me run something by you and get your response. This DAB page is unnecessary. The Johnny Cash Show should go directly to the more well known TV show, with a DAB link at the top of that page for the album. The DAB page could then be deleted. Does that make sense to you? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 04:31, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm afraid it isn't my area of expertise (although I am partial to a bit of Johnny Cash now and again). Looking over both articles there is no verifiable claims that one is more notable than the other. Also worth bearing in mind that while the TV show might have got a high profile on US TV it is possible that a general international audience might know the album better. So just going by the evidence it is difficult to call and unless one is clearly a lot more notable than the other then it is difficult to call. (Emperor (talk) 04:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC))
- I appreciate your thoughts. One thing I would say in response, as far as notability is concerned, is that the album follows the show, in other words, was only possible because of the show. That would, in my mind, indicate the album's secondary nature. And, as the album article indicates, it is one of his lesser known records. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 04:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- OK, the articles don't even mention that. Looking over the album I don't think it would be too outrageous to suggest merging it into the TV show article and moving the result to the top slot. That'd be a solution I'd prefer as I see no reason for a separate article for the album - there is no claim to notability and it could easily get deleted as it is. (Emperor (talk) 14:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC))
- I appreciate your thoughts. One thing I would say in response, as far as notability is concerned, is that the album follows the show, in other words, was only possible because of the show. That would, in my mind, indicate the album's secondary nature. And, as the album article indicates, it is one of his lesser known records. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 04:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Subarticles
Hi. Would you care to comment on my question about the subarticle parameter at Template talk:Comicsproj/sandbox? Thanks! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Nominations
I hadn't spotted it, but kind of felt something was going on, especially given the response I've had in a couple of deletion debates. Trouble is, there isn't much that can be done. I'm having real trouble turning up "reliable" sources for a lot of this stuff. Hiding T 10:18, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- You can have a go, but my impression is of a single minded editor. Hiding T 13:54, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Also
Here's a page for your watchlist: User:AlexNewArtBot/ComicsSearchResult. I'll transclude it to the noticeboard. It's a bot at User:AlexNewArtBot that matches articles based on rules at User:AlexNewArtBot/Comics. There's a log at User:AlexNewArtBot/ComicsLog which suggests I have 2000 AD weighted too high, or I have misunderstood reg exp. Need to find a regex expert. Hiding T 10:24, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Will have a bash. Hiding T 13:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
The Gauntlet
I saw your post on the talk page for the (incorrectly) titled Enter the Gauntlet, so I thought I would let you know that it is now moved to Spider-Man: The Gauntlet. --Spidey104contribs 22:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Merge discussion
I closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas K. Dye as merge. User:Barberio disputed this close and opened a deletion review, which was closed as the admin argued that merge closes are not considered at DRV. I merged the material to Newshounds and redirected the article; Barberio has reverted the redirect, though the material remains merged. A discussion on the merge is at Talk:Newshounds#Merge of Thomas K. Dye; your participation would be welcome. Fences&Windows 01:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)