User talk:Wildhartlivie

Welcome!

Currently retired from all
WP:CRIME related articles

Referencing

{{refstart}} or link to WP:REFB.

---

Request

I noticed you blind-reverted the edits I made at Scarlett Johansson. One of several problems involved in this sort of thing, apart from the discourtesy it represents to another user, and the fact that it makes the article read more poorly, is that you restore errors into the text such as using "summer 2007" when seasons of the year are relative to which hemisphere you are in. I wonder if I could encourage you if this happens again to just change the edits you actually disagree with rather than blind-reverting like this. Thanks a lot. --John (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

RE: Charlie Sheen edits and your concern thereof; if you want to add new info to an article in accepted Wiki style and know where to find a source for it, it is indeed sloppy editing to leave the responsibility to the next person who wants to take the step you were unwilling to take. This is not new nor news. Portia327 (talk) 15:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

How rich that you take such offense then tell me *I* should be the one to assume good faith. I didn't say you were a sloppy editor, I said the editing was sloppy; don't get so worked up about something as impersonal as Wiki. We're clearly both here to make the same contribution and neither of us are vandals so calm down. I noticed you properly edited the article when you went back to it and it looks much better; well done. I consider this exchange over and will not respond to you again. Portia327 (talk) 16:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

		WP:FILM Bronze Reel
		This is to acknowledge and thank you for your participation in tagging and assessing 200 articles in WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive 2009-2010. You have helped to ensure our project has a better idea of the articles under our scope. I appreciate your efforts in further helping the project! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:FILMS April Newsletter

The April 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Thoughts

Have a look at Brad Pitt. It is only selectively quoted. Many review summaries have no quotes. It passed WP:FA five weeks ago, so this is the current standard. I don't think that there is much difference between your style and that, but I am watching an active editor at this very moment trying to help.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

P.S. I am going to assume you are watching Scarlett now. Someone tagged a bunch of deadlinks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:03, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Gena Rowlands

I've been meaning to ask you about the info box on Gena Rowland's article. The spouse section seems awkward with the way the dates of her marriage to John Cassavettes is listed. I understand we want to make it plain that they were married until he died, but actually that is something that is explained within the article, so I was thinking we could delete "1954-1989, his death." Delete the, 'his death.' What do you think?Malke2010 15:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

done. Thanks.Malke2010 15:45, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jonathan Rhys Meyers. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Me-123567-Me (talk) 16:10, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Actually, you did. Otherwise I would not have left the warning. --Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:43, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

You don't have to have 3 reverts to be warned against making 4.... --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:54, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes that's true but the edits were to put the article back to what consensus says. Isn't that justifiable? --CrohnieGal^Talk 19:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

No, it's not. That's what the talk page is for. --Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

If there is a consensus about something then yes, editing the article back to the consensus version is correct. --CrohnieGal^Talk 09:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Requesting your input

Hi, Wildhartlivie. Please come contribute your thoughts to a discussion at the Bonnie and Clyde Talk page. Thanks! -- LaNaranja (talk) 03:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Inappropriate use of my talk page

My talk page is not a war zone. I'm not an admin. Please leave your disputes that don't involve me off my talk page. --Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes I agree all three of them were uncalled for on your talk page. --CrohnieGal^Talk 19:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Tables

My god what a step backwards.^[1] Jesus. Mike Allen 20:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

I agree, though it doesn't seem to matter unfortunately. I don't think we are listened to there. We get drowned out. --CrohnieGal^Talk 14:56, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Notice to anyone looking for Wildhartlivie

Hi, I have been requested to let everyone know that she is not available due to computer issues. She will return when these issues are resolved so please be patient if you need her. Hopefully she will be back real soon. --CrohnieGal^Talk 16:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Please response

There is an issue in Talk:Angelina Jolie#Left handed. Hope you like to participate in this discussion. :-) Tanvir 05:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

She's no longer with us. She should be back soon. Mike Allen 06:22, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Hopefully she will return within the next few days. :) Hope this helps. --CrohnieGal^Talk 14:54, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome back

Hi and welcome back, you've been missed. I hope you are enjoying your new keyboard. :) Lot's to do I'm sure. The vandals have been quite busy lately. --CrohnieGal^Talk 18:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Yes, welcome back! Oh, BTW, I'm typing this from my new computer!!! Vandals and creeps beware... Doc9871 (talk) 19:53, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Go get em Doc! LOL --CrohnieGal^Talk 12:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Bloody Disgusting & DreadCentral is WP:RS

Actually yes, Bloody Disgusting and DreadCentral are reliable sources. Without those sites, horror film articles wouldn't exist. :P Mike Allen 03:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Well I think this shows that Bloody Disgusting is a reliable source. DreadCentral is part of CraveOnline (who also has ComingSoon.net and ShockTilYouDrop that is used frequently here). GA and FA's have passed with these sites being used as RS. However, I don't understand why the user Zombie433 added the DreadCentral source that had nothing to do with what he was sourcing. I'm starting to get very concerned with his contributions, which I have noticed for a long time, adding ONLY Bloody Disgusting and DreadCentral as sources to articles. Most of the time the source he includes is legit (that I've noticed), but then again it's like he just adds the sites to show there's a "source". Mike Allen 05:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Just Out Of Curiosity...

Funny. I was sternly warned (with a block threat) not to post to a certain someone's talk page; I abided by it and he did not. I took the high road, though. Others can choose the low road and still get away with it (go figure). I can still post here, right ;> Cheers... Doc9871 (talk) 05:08, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Talk pages are open to all. You're welcome on my page if you take a different tone than last go. WHL's removal of my appropriate post is really rather telling. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 05:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's telling that I don't want you to post on this talk page. I don't care to hear from you, Jack. My health can't take the stress you've willingly handed out to me. I consider any posts to my talk page by you a hedge toward harassment. Please abide by my request. I've seen similar requests backed up by administrators, so please don't put yourself out to post here. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:40, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Jack, You didn't like my tone so you erased my posts (and I admit they were quite nasty); and she didn't like the tone of yours (legitimate post or not) so she removed it. There's nothing "telling", really. There's no block threat against you; but you should extend her the courtesy of not posting here, like I did for you. Then, everybody's... not less happy? Cheers... Doc9871 (talk) 05:47, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

your revisions on hilary duff

why are you making revisions to a page being improve, more of a setback, bonnie & cylde offcial 2011 relased, foodfight! not offcial put on unrelased so either 2010/2011 relased on unlisted, be more organize please, notes unneed unless appropatie take a look at the notes put, for ex one can be, [ex: 2010 | stay cool | premiered at 2009 summer film] (just an example) so pls use conceous, pls improve, tahnx :) Loquesoy (talk) 07:33, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Don't suppose you could translate that into English, could you? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:50, 15 May 2010 (UTC)