User talk:Damiens.rf

This talk page is not a battle ground

Please, stay cool.

January 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Criticism of religion. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.

In particular the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
3. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 17:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Croatia image

Hi- you removed thumb|Nudist couple in a nudist camp Baldarin, Punta Kriza from Naturism page. What was your logic? I regularly delete images from this page as it does become overloaded- but this seems innocuous. The license is OK. It is in the right section and does demonstrate the beauty of the Croatian sites- and clambering on rocks is a normal activity there- what have I missed? --ClemRutter (talk) 00:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Damiens.rf. You have new messages at Veriss1's talk page.
Message added 03:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Russ Nelson

Your previous discussion has resurfaced anew in a new section on the same page. I thought you would want to know. Toddst1 (talk) 22:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --RussNelson (talk) 03:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Rationales for deletion of files

Yesterday, you nominated for deletion four files which I had uploaded to en-Wiki. On two of them, part of your rationale was that the source was infringing on the holder's copyright by hosting the images. I fail to see what bearing that has on the files being hosted on en-Wiki, correctly identified as being in copyright and with valid NFURs. If another website is hosting photographs in breach of copyright, that is their business, and ultimately their problem should the copyright holder decide to take action. I do agree that one of the files can be deleted. If you close that discussion, I will delete the file. Mjroots (talk) 06:12, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

We need to know who the copyright holder is to be sure our use is in accordance with NFCC (how would we claim criterion #2 compliance otherwise?). That's why copying files from random websites is not allowable. --Damiens.rf 15:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring

I've reported you here for edit warring. Dreadstar ☥ 19:39, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

WTF? --Damiens.rf 19:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I see. It's happening again. A small group of article owners alternate themselves in reverting my edits without much discussion, pushing me into the 3RR trap. Counting down to be blocked. 3 months this time? --Damiens.rf 20:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule at Yoani Sánchez. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:14, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I did discussed the changes. See the talk page. Dreadstar is the one that just communicated by edit summaries and warnings. --Damiens.rf 20:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I think you missed the "first" in that sentence. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I have been reverted without discussion and discussed before further reverting. Get your facts straight.

Also, you said "#5 is bogus, but the first 4 are a clear violation. ", which is also invalid, since the first one is a revert of vandalism. You know what? Fuck off. I recommend you that you sodomize yourself with a retractable baton. --Damiens.rf 20:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)